Creep, creep-rupture tests of Al-surface-alloyed T91 steel in liquid lead bismuth at 500 and 550°C
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Surface layers made of FeCrAl alloys on T91 steel have shown their capability as corrosion protection barriers in lead bismuth. Pulsed electron beam treatment improves the density and more over the adherence of such layers. After the treatment of previously deposited coatings a surface graded material is achieved with a metallic bonded interface. Creep-rupture tests of T91 in lead-alloy at 550 °C reveal significant reduced creep strength of non-modified T91 test specimens. Oxide scales protecting the steels from attacks of the liquid metal will crack at a certain strain leading to a direct contact between the steel and the liquid metal. The negative influence of the lead-alloy on the creep behavior of non-modified T91 is stress dependent, but below a threshold stress value of 120 MPa at 550 °C this influence becomes almost negligible. At 500 °C and stress values of 200 MPa and 220 MPa the creep rates are comparable between them and significantly lower than creep rates at 180 MPa of original T91 in air at 550 °C. No signs of LBE influence are detected. The surface modified specimens tested at high stress levels instead had creep-rupture times similar to T91 (original state) tested in air. The thin oxide layers formed on the surface modified steel samples are less susceptible to crack formation and therefore to lead-alloy enhanced creep.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Handbook on Lead–Bismuth Eutectic Alloy and Lead Properties, Materials Compatibility, Thermal-hydraulics and Technologies, OECD, Nuclear Science, 2007, p. 129 ff (Chapter4).
2. Soler · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 335 · 17410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.012 ↗
3. Müller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 335 · 16310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.010 ↗
4. Fazio · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 296 · 24310.1016/S0022-3115(01)00538-4 ↗
5. Müller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 278 · 8510.1016/S0022-3115(99)00211-1 ↗
6. Glasbrenner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 296 · 23710.1016/S0022-3115(01)00522-0 ↗
7. Benamati · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 301 · 2310.1016/S0022-3115(01)00723-1 ↗
8. Deloffre · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 301 · 3510.1016/S0022-3115(01)00724-3 ↗
9. Müller · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 301 · 4010.1016/S0022-3115(01)00725-5 ↗
10. R. Ballinger, J. Lim, E. Loewen, The effect of silicon on the corrosion of iron on lead–bismuth eutectic, in: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on nuclear engineering, Tokyo, No. ICONE11-36531, 2003.10.1299/jsmeicone.2003.192 ↗
11. Mueller · Vacuum · 2005 · 77 · 46910.1016/j.vacuum.2004.09.018 ↗
12. G. Müller, G. Schumacher, A. Weisenburger, A. Heinzel, F. Zimmermann, T. Furukawa, K. Aoto, Rep.JNC TY9400 2003-026, 2003.
13. Legris · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 301 · 7010.1016/S0022-3115(01)00730-9 ↗
14. Vogt · J. Phys. IV France · 2002 · 12 · 810.1051/jp4:20020335 ↗
15. Weisenburger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 377 · 26110.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.075 ↗
16. Weisenburger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 376 · 27410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.026 ↗
17. Jianu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 394 · 10210.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.08.013 ↗
18. A. Refke, M. Gindrat, K. von Niessen, R. Damani, LPPS thin film: a hybrid coating technology between thermal spray and PVD for functional thin coatings and large area applications, in: B.R. Marple, M.M. Hyland, Y.-C. Lau, C.-J. Li, R.S. Lima, G. Montavon (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thermal Spray 2007: Global Coating Solutions, May 14–16, 2007 (Beijing,China), ASM International, 2007, pp. 705–710 (on CD-ROM).
19. Engelko · Vacuum · 2001 · 62 · 21110.1016/S0042-207X(00)00446-2 ↗
20. Gorse · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · 28410.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.047 ↗
21. Auger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 335 · 22710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.025 ↗
22. Weisenburger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · 26010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.028 ↗
23. Steiner · Report FZKA 7191 · 2006
24. Dai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 431 · 6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.11.006 ↗