journal article·2012-08

Full-length U–xPu–10Zr (x=0, 8, 19wt.%) fast reactor fuel test in FFTF

D.L. Porter, Hanchung Tsai

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 427· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The Integral Fast Reactor-1 (IFR-1) experiment performed in the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF) was the only U–Pu–10Zr (Pu-0, 8 and 19 wt.%) metallic fast reactor test with commercial-length (91.4-cm active fuel-column length) conducted to date. With few remaining test reactors, there is little opportunity for performing another test with a long active fuel column. The assembly was irradiated to the goal burnup of 10 at.%. The beginning-of-life (BOL) peak cladding temperature of the hottest pin was 608 °C, cooling to 522 °C at end-of-life (EOL). Selected fuel pins were examined non-destructively using neutron radiography, precision axial gamma scanning, and both laser and spiral contact cladding profilometry. Destructive exams included plenum gas pressure, volume, and gas composition determinations on a number of pins followed by optical metallography, electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), and alpha and beta–gamma autoradiography on a single U–19Pu–10Zr pin. The post-irradiation examinations (PIEs) showed very few differences compared to the short-pin (34.3-cm fuel column) testing performed on fuels of similar composition in Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II). The fuel column grew axially slightly less than observed in the short pins, but with the same pattern of decreasing growth with increasing Pu content. There was a difference in the fuel–cladding chemical interaction (FCCI) in that the maximum cladding penetration by interdiffusion with fuel/fission products did not occur at the top of the fuel column where the cladding temperature is highest, as observed in EBR-II tests. Instead, the more exaggerated fission-rate profile of the FFTF pins resulted in a peak FCCI at ∼0.7 X/L axial location along the fuel column. This resulted from a higher production of rare-earth fission products at this location and a higher ΔT between fuel center and cladding than at core center, together providing more rare earths at the cladding and more FCCI. This behavior could actually help extend the life of a fuel pin in a “long pin” reactor design to a higher peak fuel burnup.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Crawford · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 371 · 20210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.010 ↗
2. H. Ohta, T. Yokoo, T. Ogata, T. Inoue, M. Ougier, J.P. Glatz, B. Fontaine, L. Breton, Irradiation experiment on fast reactor metal fuels containing minor actinides up to 7at.% burnup, Global 2007, Boise, Idaho, September 9–13, 2007.
3. S. Pillon, N. Schmidt, E. Abonneau, Y. Croixmarie, L. Donnet, S. Hayes, M. Meyer, K. Chidester, B. Margevicius, A. Fernandez, D. Haas, The FUTURIX-FTA experiment in Phénix, in: Proceedings of Global 2003, New Orleans, Louisianna, November 16–20, 2003, pp. 220–227.
4. B.A. Hilton, S.L. Hayes, M.K. Meyer, D.C. Crawford, G.S. Chang, R. Ambrosek, The AFC-1AE and AFC-1F irradiation tests of metallic and nitride fuels for actinide transmutation, Global 2003, New Orleans, Louisiana, November 16–20, 2003.
5. A. Cohen, H. Tsai, 1990, Fuel/cladding compatibility in full-length metallic IFR fuels at elevated temperature, in: Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Winter Meeting of the American Nuclear Society, vol. 71, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 185–186.
6. H. Tsai, L.A. Neimark, Irradiation of full-length metallic IFR fuels, in: International Conference on Design and Safety of Advanced Nuclear Power Plants, Tokyo, Japan, October 25–29, 1992.
7. Hofman · Metall. Trans. A · 1990 · 21A · 518
8. G.L. Hofman, L.C. Walters, Metallic fast reactor fuels, from materials science and technology: a comprehensive treatment, Part 1, in: B.R.T. Frost, R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen, E.J. Kramer, (Eds.), vol. 10A, VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1994, pp. 1–43.
9. D.D. Keiser, Fuel–cladding interaction layers in irradiated U–Zr and U–Pu–Zr fuel elements, ANL-NT-240, January 2006.10.2172/885496 ↗
10. Pahl · Metall. Trans. A · 1990 · 21A · 186310.1007/BF02647233 ↗
11. Mariani · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 419 · 26310.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.08.036 ↗
12. Garner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1987 · 148 · 27910.1016/0022-3115(87)90021-3 ↗
13. R.G. Pahl, R.S. Wisner, M.C. Billone, G.L. Hofman, Steady-state irradiation testing of U–Pu–Zr fuel to >18at.% burnup, in: Proceedings of the International Fast Reactor Safety Meeting, vol. 4, Snowbird, Utah, 1990, pp. 129–138.
14. S.L. Hayes, SAFE: a computer code for the steady-state and transient thermal analysis of lmr fuel, elements, ANL-IFR-221 (1993).
15. D. O’Boyle, A.E. Dwight, Uranium–plutonium–zirconium ternary alloy system, in: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Plutonium and Other Actinides, Nucl. Met. 1L, Part II, vol. 17(2), 1970, pp. 720–733.
16. Hofman · Prog. Nucl. Energy · 1997 · 31 · 8310.1016/0149-1970(96)00005-4 ↗
17. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 327 · 2710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.012 ↗
18. Cohen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 204 · 24410.1016/0022-3115(93)90223-L ↗