journal article·2015-01Open access

The influence of glass composition on crystalline phase stability in glass-ceramic wasteforms

Ewan Maddrell, Stephanie Thornber, Neil C. Hyatt

Abstract

Zirconolite glass-ceramic wasteforms were prepared using a suite of Na2O–Al2O3–B2O3–SiO2 glass matrices with variable Al:B ratios. Zirconolite was the dominant crystalline phase only for the most alumina rich glass compositions. As the Al:B ratio decreased zirconolite was replaced by sphene, zircon and rutile. Thermodynamic data were used to calculate a silica activity in the glass melt below which zirconolite is the favoured crystalline phase. The concept of the crystalline reference state of glass melts is then utilised to provide a physical basis for why silica activity varies with the Al:B ratio.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Glass properties and applications · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. C.R. Scales, E.R. Maddrell, N. Gawthorpe, B.D. Begg, S. Moricca, R.A. Day, M.W.A. Stewart. Demonstrating a glass-ceramic route for the immobilisation of plutonium containing wastes and residues on the Sellafield site. in: Proceedings WM’06, 2006.
2. M. W. A. Stewart, S.A. Moricca, B.D. Begg, R.A. Day, C.R. Scales, E.R. Maddrell, A.B. Eilbeck, Flexible process options for the immobilisation of residues and wastes containing plutonium, in: The 11th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., 2007, pp. 1453–60.10.1115/ICEM2007-7246 ↗
3. M.L. Carter, H. Li, Y. Zhang, A.L. Gillen, E.R. Vance, HIPped tailored pyrochlore-rich glass-ceramic waste forms for the immobilization of nuclear waste, in: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXII Materials Research Society Proceedings, vol. 1124, Cambridge University Press, 2009.
4. Zhang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 54510.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.035 ↗
5. J.W. Greig, T.F.W. Barth, Fig. 507 in Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, Publ. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1964, 5th Ser., vol. 35A, Am. J. Sci., 1938, p. 94.
6. G.W. Morey, Fig. 515 in Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, publ. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1964, vol. 35, J. Soc. Glass Tech., 1951, p. 270.
7. R.L. Putnam, U.F. Gallegos, A. Navrotsky, K.B. Helean, S.V. Ushakov, B.F. Woodfield, J. Boerio-Goates, B.B. Ebbinghaus, M.A. Williamson, Formation energetics of ceramic phases related to surplus plutonium disposition, in: Environmental Issues and Waste Management Technologies VI, Ceramic Transactions 119, Publ. American Ceramic Society, 2001, pp. 147–5810.2172/768979 ↗
8. Manon · Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. · 2008 · 156 · 70910.1007/s00410-008-0311-3 ↗
9. Table 8.8i in Smithells Metals Reference Book, 7th ed., Publ. Butterworth Heinmann, 1992.
10. Loiseau · J. Mater. Sci. · 2003 · 38 · 84310.1023/A:1021873301498 ↗
11. Loiseau · J. Mater. Sci. · 2003 · 38 · 84310.1023/A:1021873301498 ↗
12. Loiseau · Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. · 2004 · 807 · 359
13. Conradt · J. Non-Cryst. Sol. · 2004 · 345–346 · 1610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.07.038 ↗
14. Fleet · Am. Min. · 1992 · 77 · 76