Anomalous bias factors of dislocations in bcc iron
Source abstract
Abstract
Dislocation bias factors in bcc Fe have been calculated based on atomistic interaction energy maps on three kinds of dislocations, namely the a 0 /2 〈 1 1 1 〉 {1 1 0} screw, a 0 /2 〈 1 1 1 〉 {1 1 0} and a 0 〈 1 0 0 〉 {0 0 1} edge dislocations. The results show that the dislocation bias is higher for the a 0 /2 〈 1 1 1 〉 edge dislocation than for the a 0 〈 1 0 0 〉 edge dislocation, even though the latter possesses a larger Burgers vector. This indicates the importance of the dislocation core contribution. For the a 0 /2 〈 1 1 1 〉 {1 1 0} screw dislocation, a negative dislocation bias has been obtained, which implies a more efficient absorption of vacancies than of SIAs. The effect of coexistence of both edge- and screw dislocations are assessed by a total bias. A possible complementary mechanism for explaining the long swelling incubation time in bcc metals is suggested and discussed.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Greenwood · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1959 · 1 · 30510.1016/0022-3115(59)90030-3 ↗
2. Golubov · Philos. Mag. A · 2001 · 81 · 253310.1080/01418610108217162 ↗
3. Walters · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1985 · 136 · 26310.1016/0022-3115(85)90014-5 ↗
4. Garner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 12310.1016/S0022-3115(99)00225-1 ↗
5. Wolfer · J. Comput. Aid. Mater. Des. · 2007 · 14 · 40310.1007/s10820-007-9051-3 ↗
6. Ham · J. Appl. Phys. · 1959 · 30 · 91510.1063/1.1735262 ↗
7. Seif · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · S63310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.02.083 ↗
8. Chang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 441 · 35710.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.029 ↗
9. Nagakawa · Philos. Mag. · 1975 · 32 · 110710.1080/14786437508228093 ↗
10. Zinkle · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 351 · 26910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.031 ↗
11. Yoshida · J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 1975 · 39 · 17010.1143/JPSJ.39.170 ↗
12. Jenkins · Philos. Mag. A · 1978 · 38 · 9710.1080/01418617808239220 ↗
13. Porollo · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 256 · 24710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00043-9 ↗
14. Gelles · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 108 · 51510.1016/0022-3115(82)90523-2 ↗
15. Wolfer · 2012
16. Mansur · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 105 · 3610.1016/0022-3115(82)90449-4 ↗
17. Heald · Philos. Mag. · 1975 · 31 · 55110.1080/14786437508226537 ↗
18. Wolfer · J. Appl. Phys. · 1976 · 47 · 79110.1063/1.322710 ↗
19. Osetsky · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2003 · 11 · 42710.1088/0965-0393/11/4/302 ↗
20. Rodney · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 60710.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.044 ↗
21. Johnson · Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 134 · A132910.1103/PhysRev.134.A1329 ↗
22. Domain · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 65 · 02410310.1103/PhysRevB.65.024103 ↗
23. Dudarev · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 17 · 7097
24. Mendelev · Philos. Mag. · 2003 · 83 · 397710.1080/14786430310001613264 ↗
25. Chaussidon · Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 340710.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.044 ↗
26. Chou · J. Appl. Phys. · 1967 · 38 · 153510.1063/1.1709719 ↗
27. Simonelli · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 72710.1103/PhysRevB.50.727 ↗
28. Hayward · Philos. Mag. · 2012 · 92 · 275910.1080/14786435.2012.674646 ↗
29. Mansur · Nucl. Technol. · 1978 · 40 · 510.13182/NT78-2 ↗
30. Nguyen-Manh · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 02010110.1103/PhysRevB.73.020101 ↗
31. Willaime · Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 2005 · 228 · 9210.1016/j.nimb.2004.10.028 ↗
32. R. Bullough, M. Wood, E. Little, ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1981, pp. 593–609.
33. Katoh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 225 · 15410.1016/0022-3115(94)00669-5 ↗
34. Little · Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci. · 1980 · 56510.1098/rspa.1980.0131 ↗
35. Konobeev · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 355 · 12410.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.011 ↗