Multiscale development of a fission gas thermal conductivity model: Coupling atomic, meso and continuum level simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
Fission gas production and evolution significantly impact the fuel performance, causing swelling, a reduction in the thermal conductivity and fission gas release. However, typical empirical models of fuel properties treat each of these effects separately and uncoupled. Here, we couple a fission gas release model to a model of the impact of fission gas on the fuel thermal conductivity. To quantify the specific impact of grain boundary (GB) bubbles on the thermal conductivity, we use atomistic and mesoscale simulations. Atomistic molecular dynamic simulations were employed to determine the GB thermal resistance. These values were then used in mesoscale heat conduction simulations to develop a mechanistic expression for the effective GB thermal resistance of a GB containing gas bubbles, as a function of the percentage of the GB covered by fission gas. The coupled fission gas release and thermal conductivity model was implemented in Idaho National Laboratory’s BISON fuel performance code to model the behavior of a 10-pellet LWR fuel rodlet, showing how the fission gas impacts the UO2 thermal conductivity. Furthermore, additional BISON simulations were conducted to demonstrate the impact of average grain size on both the fuel thermal conductivity and the fission gas release. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Nuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Lucuta · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 232 · 16610.1016/S0022-3115(96)00404-7 ↗
2. Forsberg · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1985 · 135 · 14010.1016/0022-3115(85)90071-6 ↗
3. Pastore · Nucl. Eng. Des. · 2013 · 256 · 7510.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.12.002 ↗
4. Watanabe · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 375 · 38810.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.01.016 ↗
5. Phillpot · JOM – J. Min. Met. Mater. Soc. · 2011 · 63 · 7310.1007/s11837-011-0143-x ↗
6. Chernatynskiy · J. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 1
7. Bakker · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 226 · 12810.1016/0022-3115(95)00087-9 ↗
8. Millett · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 03351210.1063/1.2964116 ↗
9. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 2210.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.048 ↗
10. Millett · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 412 · 28110.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.02.040 ↗
11. Oh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 414 · 32010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.059 ↗
12. Chockalingam · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 430 · 16610.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.06.027 ↗
13. Li · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2012 · 43A · 106010.1007/s11661-011-0936-0 ↗
14. Rashid · JOM – J. Min. Met. Mater. Soc. · 2011 · 63 · 8110.1007/s11837-011-0144-9 ↗
15. Horstemeyer · Int. J. Plast. · 2010 · 26 · 131010.1016/j.ijplas.2010.06.005 ↗
16. Horstemeyer · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2003 · 11 · 26510.1088/0965-0393/11/3/301 ↗
17. P. Winter, D. MacInnes, IAEA Technical Committee on Water Reactor Fuel Element Computer Modelling in Steady-state, Transient and Accident Conditions, Preston, UK, Paper No. IAEA-TC-657/5.6, 1988.
18. Williamson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 423 · 14910.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.01.012 ↗
19. A. Booth, Technical Report, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, 1957.
20. Dowling · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 110 · 3710.1016/0022-3115(82)90405-6 ↗
21. Govers · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 366 · 16110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.070 ↗
22. Kapitza · J. Phys. (Moscow) · 1941 · 4 · 181
23. Fink · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 279 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(99)00273-1 ↗
24. Aring · J. Appl. Phys. · 1967 · 38 · 149610.1063/1.1709680 ↗
25. Abramowski · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 275 · 1210.1016/S0022-3115(99)00110-5 ↗
26. Yamada · J. Alloys Compds. · 2000 · 307 · 1010.1016/S0925-8388(00)00806-9 ↗
27. Brokman · Acta Metall. · 1981 · 29 · 170310.1016/0001-6160(81)90005-5 ↗
28. Nerikar · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 06411110.1103/PhysRevB.81.064111 ↗
29. Nerikar · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2011 · 94 · 189310.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04295.x ↗
30. Basak · J. Alloys Compds. · 2003 · 360 · 21010.1016/S0925-8388(03)00350-5 ↗
31. Kadau · Science · 2002 · 296 · 168110.1126/science.1070375 ↗
32. Schelling · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 14430610.1103/PhysRevB.65.144306 ↗
33. P. Jund, R. Jullien, 1999, Arxiv preprint cond-mat/9903033.
34. Yang · Acta Mater. · 2002 · 50 · 230910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00057-5 ↗
35. Tonks · Compos. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 51 · 2010.1016/j.commatsci.2011.07.028 ↗
36. Thornton · Proc. Phys. Soc. · 1960 · 76 · 10410.1088/0370-1328/76/1/313 ↗
37. Lassman · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 208 · 22310.1016/0022-3115(94)90331-X ↗
38. Rondinella · Mater. Today · 2010 · 13 · 2410.1016/S1369-7021(10)70221-2 ↗