journal article·2011-07

Ab initio based rate theory model of radiation induced amorphization in β-SiC

Narasimhan Swaminathan, Dane Morgan, Izabela Szlufarska

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 414· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract An ab initio informed rate theory framework for a multicomponent system is developed and used to model radiation induced amorphization in β-SiC. Based on the published modeling and experimental studies we propose three possible energy landscapes (ELs) for defect recombination in SiC. We demonstrate that defect ELs have a dramatic effect on the shape of the dose to amorphization vs. temperature curve and on the critical temperature to amorphization Tcr. In the no-barrier EL model, Tcr is correlated with the mobility of silicon interstitials, while in the recombination and trapping models Tcr is governed by the rate of defect recombination. We conclude that both the defect migration barrier and the defect recombination barrier are key parameters to consider when modeling radiation resistance of SiC, and possibly of other multi-component covalent materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. A technology roadmap for generation iv nuclear energy systems, gif-00200 (December 2002).
2. T.R. Allen, D.C. Crawfard, in: Proceedings of ICAPP ’03, Cordboa, Spain, American Nuclear Society, 2003, p. 3237.
3. Zinkle · Mater. Today · 2009 · 1210.1016/S1369-7021(09)70294-9 ↗
4. Nozawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 368 · 62210.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.305 ↗
5. Gao · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 18410110.1103/PhysRevB.81.184101 ↗
6. Swaminathan · Acta. Mater · 2010 · 58 · 284310.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.009 ↗
7. Gao · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B. · 2001 · 180 · 17610.1016/S0168-583X(01)00415-3 ↗
8. Gao · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 1
9. Bockstedte · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 20520110.1103/PhysRevB.68.205201 ↗
10. Shrader · J. Nucl. Mater · 2011 · 31 · 25710.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.088 ↗
11. Lucas · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 086208
12. Roma · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 403 · 3210.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.001 ↗
13. Bockstedte · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 23520210.1103/PhysRevB.69.235202 ↗
14. Weber · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B. · 1995 · 106 · 29810.1016/0168-583X(95)00722-9 ↗
15. Weber · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 253 · 5310.1016/S0022-3115(97)00305-X ↗
16. Newsome · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 371 · 37110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.007 ↗
17. Kondo · Phys. Rev. B. · 2011 · 83 · 07520210.1103/PhysRevB.83.075202 ↗
18. Riccardi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329 · 5610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.002 ↗
19. Ivashchenko · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 08520910.1103/PhysRevB.75.085209 ↗
20. Ishimaru · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 02411610.1103/PhysRevB.72.024116 ↗
21. Inui · Phil. Mag. B. · 1992 · 65 · 110.1080/13642819208223042 ↗
22. Was · 2007
23. Pedraza · J. Mater. Res. · 1986 · 1 · 42510.1557/JMR.1986.0425 ↗
24. Motta · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 270 · 17410.1016/S0022-3115(98)00657-6 ↗
25. Motta · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1990 · 38 · 217510.1016/0956-7151(90)90085-U ↗
26. Zinkle · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B · 1996 · 116 · 9210.1016/0168-583X(96)00016-X ↗
27. Motta · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 244 · 22710.1016/S0022-3115(96)00740-4 ↗
28. Snead · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B · 1998 · 141 · 12310.1016/S0168-583X(98)00085-8 ↗
29. Ishimaru · Phys. Rev. B. · 2003 · 68 · 14410210.1103/PhysRevB.68.144102 ↗
30. Lucas · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 161202R10.1103/PhysRevB.72.161202 ↗
31. M. Norgett, M. Robinson, I. Torrens, An analytical way to copmute dpa in solids, Tech. Rep. CEA-R-4389, 1972.
32. Snead · Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1997 · 439 · 59510.1557/PROC-439-595 ↗
33. Waite · J. Chem. Phys. · 1958 · 28 · 10310.1063/1.1744051 ↗
34. Gao · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 24520510.1103/PhysRevB.69.245205 ↗
35. Tucker · J. Nucl. Mat. · 2010 · 405 · 21610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.08.003 ↗
36. LeClaire · Philos. Mag. · 1956 · 8 · 51810.1080/14786435608238133 ↗
37. Allnatt · 1993
38. Weber · Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 2000 · 166-167 · 9810.1016/S0168-583X(99)00643-6 ↗
39. Mishra · Acta. Mat. · 2009 · 57 · 615610.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.041 ↗
40. Malerba · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 289 · 5710.1016/S0022-3115(00)00684-X ↗
41. Devanathan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 390910.1063/1.1739515 ↗
42. Xianglong Yuan · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B. · 2002 · 191 · 7410.1016/S0168-583X(02)00516-5 ↗
43. MATLAB, The Mathworks Inc. version- R2009b.