journal article·2012-05

Advantages and disadvantages of using a focused ion beam to prepare TEM samples from irradiated U–10Mo monolithic nuclear fuel

B.D. Miller, J. Gan, J. Madden, J.F. Jue, A. Robinson, D.D. Keiser

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 424· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and focused ion beam (FIB) milling were performed on an irradiated U–10Mo monolithic fuel to understand its irradiation microstructure. This is the first reported TEM work of an irradiated fuel sample prepared using a FIB. Advantages and disadvantages of using the FIB to create TEM samples from this irradiated fuel will be presented along with some results from the work. Sample preparation techniques used to create SEM and FIB samples from the brittle irradiated monolithic sample will also be discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Radioactive element chemistry and processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. D.M. Wachs, D.D. Keiser, Jr., M.K. Meyer, D.E. Burkes, C.L. Clark, G.A. Moore, J.-F. Jue, T. Totev, G.L. Hofman, T.C. Wiencek, Y.S. Kim, J.L. Snelgrove, GLOBAL 2007, American Nuclear Society, Boise, ID, USA, September 9–13, 2007.
2. D.D. Keiser Jr., J.F. Jue, A.B. Robinson, M.R. Finlay, RRFM-2008, in: 14th International Meeting on Research Reactor Fuel Management, European Nuclear Society, Hamburg, Germany, March 2–5, 2008.
3. C.L. Clark, J.-F. Jue, G.A. Moore, N.P. Hallinan, B.H. Park, D.E. Burkes, RERTR-2006, in: 28th International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment For Research and Test Reactors, Cape Town, South Africa, October 29–November 2, 2006.
4. A.B. Robinson, G.S. Chang, D.D. Keiser Jr., D.M. Wachs, D.L. Porter, Irradiation Performance of U–Mo Alloy based Monolithic Plate-type Fuel-Design Selection, INL/EXT-09-16807, August 2009, .10.2172/968567 ↗
5. Van den Berghe · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 375 · 34010.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.12.006 ↗
6. Gan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 396 · 23410.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.11.015 ↗
7. Munroe · Mater. Char. · 2009 · 60 · 210.1016/j.matchar.2008.11.014 ↗
8. Yao · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2011 · 509 · 948710.1016/j.jallcom.2011.07.048 ↗
9. Perez · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 402 · 810.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.04.016 ↗
10. Certain · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 407 · 210.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.002 ↗
11. Kishimoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 423
12. Pouchon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 352 · 5710.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.070 ↗
13. Yabuuchi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 414 · 49810.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.008 ↗
14. Tang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 49710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.001 ↗
15. D.D. Keiser Jr., J.F. Jue, B.D. Miller, J. Gan, A.B. Robinson, P. Medvedev, RERTR-2011, in: 33rd International Meeting on Reduced Enrichment For Research and Test Reactors, Santiago, Chile, October 23–27, 2011.
16. Giannuzzi · 2005