journal article·2015-02Open access

The influence of high grain boundary density on helium retention in tungsten

G. Valles, C. González, I. Martin-Bragado, R. Iglesias, J.M. Perlado, A. Rivera

Abstract

Abstract In order to study the influence of a high grain boundary density on the amount, size and distribution of defects produced by pulsed helium (625 keV) irradiation in tungsten, we have carried out Object Kinetic Monte Carlo (OKMC) simulations in both monocrystalline and nanocrystalline tungsten. The parameterization of the OKMC code (MMonCa) includes binding energies obtained with our in-house Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. In the interior of a grain in nanocrystalline tungsten the mixed He n V m clusters are larger and have a lower He/V ratio. Thus, they are less pressurized clusters. The total elastic strain energy remains almost constant with the increasing number of pulses, contrary to its increase in monocrystalline tungsten. A better response to helium irradiation is therefore expected in nanocrystalline tungsten, opening a new path to investigate these nanostructured materials for fusion purposes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Davis · J. Nucl. Mater · 1998 · 258–263 · 30810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00285-2 ↗
2. Nygren · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2000 · 49–50 · 30310.1016/S0920-3796(00)00388-4 ↗
3. Sethian · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 347 · 16110.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.08.019 ↗
4. Sethian · IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2010 · 38 · 69010.1109/TPS.2009.2037629 ↗
5. Federici · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 1110.1016/S0022-3115(02)01327-2 ↗
6. Renk · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 61 · 5710.13182/FST12-A13339 ↗
7. Alvarez Ruiz · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 60 · 56510.13182/FST11-A12443 ↗
8. Raffray · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 347 · 17810.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.08.015 ↗
9. Raffray · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 162710.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.07.041 ↗
10. Blanchard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 347 · 19210.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.08.007 ↗
11. Alvarez · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2011 · 86 · 176210.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.01.080 ↗
12. Raffray · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2004 · 46 · 41710.13182/FST04-A581 ↗
13. Trinkaus · Radiat. Eff. · 1983 · 78 · 18910.1080/00337578308207371 ↗
14. Donnelly · Radiat. Eff. · 1985 · 90 · 110.1080/00337578508222514 ↗
15. Sharafat · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 90010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.318 ↗
16. Kajita · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 09500510.1088/0029-5515/49/9/095005 ↗
17. Zenobia · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 2009 · 01404910.1088/0031-8949/2009/T138/014049 ↗
18. Zenobia · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 425 · 8310.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.029 ↗
19. Chernikov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1989 · 165 · 8910.1016/0022-3115(89)90237-7 ↗
20. Thomas · Radiat. Eff. · 1983 · 78 · 3710.1080/00337578308207358 ↗
21. Iwakiri · J. Nucl. Mater · 2000 · 283–287 · 113410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00289-0 ↗
22. Gordillo · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 316 · 110.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.061 ↗
23. Gonzalez-Arrabal · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 453 · 28710.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.057 ↗
24. Martin-Bragado · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2013 · 184 · 270310.1016/j.cpc.2013.07.011 ↗
25. .
26. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
27. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
28. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
29. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
30. Blochl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
31. Becquart · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 385 · 22310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.027 ↗
32. Becquart · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 403 · 7510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.003 ↗
33. González · J. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 49 · 812710.1007/s10853-014-8522-7 ↗
34. Takayama · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys · 2013 · 52
35. Tamura · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2014 · 22 · 01500210.1088/0965-0393/22/1/015002 ↗
36. Henriksson · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At · 2006 · 244 · 37710.1016/j.nimb.2005.10.020 ↗
37. Juslin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 6110.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.023 ↗
38. Debelle · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At · 2010 · 268 · 22310.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.176 ↗
39. .
40. Debelle · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 362 · 18110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.021 ↗
41. Gilliam · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 347 · 28910.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.08.017 ↗
42. De Backer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 429 · 7810.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.024 ↗
43. Wolfer · Philos. Mag. -Phys. Condens. Matter Struct. Defects Mech. Prop. · 1988 · 58 · 285
44. Mills · Phys. Rev. B · 1980 · 21 · 513710.1103/PhysRevB.21.5137 ↗
45. Li · Int. J. Plast. · 2012 · 32–33 · 110.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.007 ↗
46. Gao · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2011 · 23 · 44220110.1088/0953-8984/23/44/442201 ↗
47. Gao · J. Phys. Condens. Matter Inst. Phys. J. · 2011 · 23 · 24540310.1088/0953-8984/23/24/245403 ↗
48. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 25010.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.016 ↗
49. Boisse · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 455 · 1010.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.02.031 ↗