Formation energy of vacancies in FeCr alloys: Dependence on Cr concentration
Source abstract
Abstract
A modified version of the concentration-dependent model (CDM) potential (A. Caro et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 075702) [1] has been developed to study defects in Fe–Cr for different Crconcentrations. A comparison between this new potential and DFT results for a variety of point defect configurations is performed in order to test its reliability for radiation damage studies. The effect of Crconcentration on the vacancyformationenergy in Fe–Cr alloys is analyzed in detail. This study shows a linear dependence of the vacancyformationenergy on Crconcentration for values above 6% of Cr. However, the formationenergy deviates from the linear interpolation in the region below 6% Crconcentration. In order to understand this behavior, the influence of the relative positions between Cr atoms and vacant sites on the vacancyformationenergy has been studied.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Caro · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 07570210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.075702 ↗
2. Sadigh · Philos. Mag. · 2009 · 89 · 337110.1080/14786430903292373 ↗
3. van der Schaaf · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 89310.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.08.040 ↗
4. Jenkins · Philos. Mag. A · 1978 · 38 · 9710.1080/01418617808239220 ↗
5. Little · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1979 · 87 · 2510.1016/0022-3115(79)90123-5 ↗
6. Little · Proc. R. Soc. London A · 1980 · 372
7. Garner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 276 · 12310.1016/S0022-3115(99)00225-1 ↗
8. A. Fry, S. Osgerby, M. Wright, Oxidation of Alloys in Steam Environment – A Review, National Physics Laboratory Report NPL MATC(A), 2002, p. 90.
9. Dudarev · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386
10. Caro · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 2190210.1063/1.2354445 ↗
11. Caro · J. Min. Met. Mater. (JOM) · 2007 · 59 · 2
12. Erhart · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 13420610.1103/PhysRevB.77.134206 ↗
13. Olsson · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 01411010.1103/PhysRevB.75.014110 ↗
14. Nguyen-Manh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367 · 25710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.006 ↗
15. Fu · Nature Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 6810.1038/nmat1286 ↗
16. Soneda · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 16910.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.021 ↗
17. Domain · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 335 · 12110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.037 ↗
18. Olsson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 321 · 8410.1016/S0022-3115(03)00207-1 ↗
19. Stukowski · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 17 · 07500510.1088/0965-0393/17/7/075005 ↗
20. , .
21. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77, second ed., 1992, p. 413.
22. J.M. Sampedro, E. del Río, M.J. Caturla, M. Victoria, J.M. Perlado, Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Fusion Reactor Materials (ICFRM-14), Sapporo (Japan), September 2009, J. Nucl. Mater.
23. Willaime · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2005 · 228 · 9210.1016/j.nimb.2004.10.028 ↗
24. Terentyev · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 10410810.1103/PhysRevB.75.104108 ↗
25. Klaver · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 09443510.1103/PhysRevB.74.094435 ↗
26. Froideval · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 23720110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.237201 ↗