Stability and dissolution of helium–vacancy complexes in vanadium solid
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We report the energetics, stability, and diffusion behavior of helium (He), vacancies (V), and helium–vacancy complex clusters He n V m ( n , m = 0–4) in vanadium solid from first-principles calculations. For He, vacancy site is more energetically favorable than tetrahedral interstitial by ∼0.74 eV, while hydrogen always prefers to stay in tetrahedral sites in vanadium. He exhibits a low migration energy (0.06 eV) and can be easily trapped in vacancy. A nearly linear relationship between formation energy and the number of He or vacancy is obtained for He or vacancy clusters, and the weak binding energies of He clusters indicate that He clusters themselves are unstable. The binding energies and dissociation energies of He and vacancy to helium–vacancy complex clusters are computed and compared well with the experimental observation from helium desorption spectra. The cluster stability depends on He content. Finally, He diffusion coefficients are predicted to be (1.07–1.27) × 10 −8 m 2 s −1 at typical temperatures of 600–800 K. We thus propose that He aggregation via vacancy trapping should be the main mechanism for He bubble formation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Barabash · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 2110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.017 ↗
2. Ehrlich · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 7910.1016/S0022-3115(00)00102-1 ↗
3. Kurtz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 7010.1016/S0022-3115(00)00351-2 ↗
4. Stoneham · Et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2004 · 16 · S259710.1088/0953-8984/16/27/001 ↗
5. Smith · Fusion Eng. Des. · 1995 · 29 · 39910.1016/0920-3796(95)80046-Z ↗
6. Chung · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 239 · 13910.1016/S0022-3115(96)00676-9 ↗
7. Matsui · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 9210.1016/S0022-3115(96)00331-5 ↗
8. Smith · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 35610.1016/S0022-3115(96)00231-0 ↗
9. Zinkle · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 20510.1016/S0022-3115(98)00269-4 ↗
10. Kirillov · Fusion Eng. Des. · 1998 · 39–40 · 66910.1016/S0920-3796(98)00199-9 ↗
11. Gohar · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2000 · 49–50 · 55110.1016/S0920-3796(00)00279-9 ↗
12. Gohar · Fusion Eng. Des. · 1995 · 27 · 5210.1016/0920-3796(95)90117-5 ↗
13. Smith · Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. · 2000 · 18 · 21310.1016/S0263-4368(00)00037-8 ↗
14. Gilbert · Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 04300510.1088/0029-5515/51/4/043005 ↗
15. Oku · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 86410.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.068 ↗
16. Aoyagi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283 · 87610.1016/S0022-3115(00)00140-9 ↗
17. Kuroiwa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 59410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.185 ↗
18. Braski · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 141–143 · 1125
19. Tanaka · Mater. Trans. JIM · 1993 · 34 · 108310.2320/matertrans1989.34.1083 ↗
20. Loomis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 191–194 · 84
21. Hirohata · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 348 · 3310.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.08.005 ↗
22. Adams · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 41 · 331610.1103/PhysRevB.41.3316 ↗
23. Vassen · Phys. Rev.B · 1991 · 44 · 420610.1103/PhysRevB.44.4206 ↗
24. Fedorov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 38510.1016/S0022-3115(96)00032-3 ↗
25. Chen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 302 · 13510.1016/S0022-3115(02)00775-4 ↗
26. Chen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 56610.1016/S0022-3115(02)01214-X ↗
27. Mukouda · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 41210.1016/S0022-3115(02)01081-4 ↗
28. Nita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 50510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.109 ↗
29. Chernov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 271–272 · 27410.1016/S0022-3115(98)00784-3 ↗
30. Fu · Phys. Rev.B · 2005 · 72 · 06411710.1103/PhysRevB.72.064117 ↗
31. Becquart · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 19640210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.196402 ↗
32. H.B. Zhou, Y. L, Liu, Sh. Jin, Y. Zhang, G. N, Luo, G. H, Lu, Nucl. Fusion, 50 115010.10.1088/0029-5515/50/11/115010 ↗
33. Liu · Phys. Rev.B · 2009 · 79 · 17210310.1103/PhysRevB.79.172103 ↗
34. Seletskaia · Phys. Rev.B · 2008 · 78 · 13410310.1103/PhysRevB.78.134103 ↗
35. Zhang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 413 · 9010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.031 ↗
36. Zhang · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B. · 2011 · 269 · 173510.1016/j.nimb.2010.11.075 ↗
37. Kohn · Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 140 · A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
38. Hohenberg · Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 136 · B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
39. Kresse · Phys. Rev.B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
40. Kresse · Phys. Rev.B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
41. Perdew · Phys. Rev.B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
42. Blöchl · Phys. Rev.B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
43. Kresse · Phys. Rev.B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
44. Monkhorst · Phys. Rev.B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
45. Kittle · 1986
46. Henkelman · J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 113 · 997810.1063/1.1323224 ↗
47. Henkelman · Phys. · 2000 · 113 · 9901
48. Janot · J. Phys. F-Metal Phys. · 1982 · 12 · 4710.1088/0305-4608/12/1/006 ↗
49. Nguyen-Manh · Phys. Rev.B · 2006 · 73 · 02010110.1103/PhysRevB.73.020101 ↗
50. Derlet · Phys. Rev.B · 2007 · 76 · 05410710.1103/PhysRevB.76.054107 ↗
51. Jiang · Phys. Rev.B · 2004 · 70 · 06410210.1103/PhysRevB.70.064102 ↗
52. Morishita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 24310.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.019 ↗
53. Morishita · Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 2003 · 202 · 7610.1016/S0168-583X(02)01832-3 ↗
54. Wilson · Phys. Rev.B · 1981 · 24 · 561610.1103/PhysRevB.24.5616 ↗
55. Becquart · Mater. · 2009 · 385 · 223
56. Frauenfelder · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1969 · 6 · 38810.1116/1.1492699 ↗
57. ITER Technical Basis, ITER EDA Documentation Series No 24, in, IAEA, Vienna 2002.