journal article·2006-12

Corrosion behavior and oxide properties of Zr–1.1wt%Nb–0.05wt%Cu alloy

Jeong-Yong Park, Byung-Kwon Choi, Seung Jo Yoo, Yong Hwan Jeong

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 359· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The corrosion behavior and oxide properties of Zr–1.1 wt%Nb–0.05 wt%Cu (ZrNbCu) and Zircaloy-4 have been investigated. The corrosion rate of the ZrNbCu alloy was much lower than that of the Zirclaoy-4 in the 360 °C water and 360 °C PWR-simulating loop condition without a neutron flux and it was increased with an increase of the final annealing temperature from 470 °C to 570 °C. TEM observations revealed that the precipitates in the ZrNbCu were β-Nb and ZrNbFe-precipitate with β-Nb being more frequently observed and that the precipitates were more finely distributed in the ZrNbCu alloy. It was also observed that the oxides of the ZrNbCu and Zircaloy-4 consisted of two and seven layers, respectively, after 1000 days in the PWR-simulating loop condition and that the thickness of a fully-developed layer was higher in the ZrNbCu than in the Zircaloy-4. It was also found that the β-Nb in ZrNbCu was oxidized more slowly when compared to the Zr(Fe, Cr)2 in Zirclaoy-4 when the precipitates in the oxide were observed by TEM. Cracks were observed in the vicinity of the oxidized Zr(Fe, Cr)2, while no cracks were formed near β-Nb which had retained a metallic state. From the results obtained, it is suggested that the oxide formed on the ZrNbCu has a more protective nature against a corrosion when compared to that of the Zircaloy-4.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Sabol · ASTM STP · 1989 · 1023 · 227
2. Mardon · ASTM STP · 2000 · 1354 · 505
3. Yamate · Proc. of the 1997 International Topical Meeting on LWR Fuel Performance · 1997 · 318
4. Park · Proc. of 2005 Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting · 2005 · 188
5. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 326 · 12510.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.015 ↗
6. Jeong · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 302 · 910.1016/S0022-3115(02)00703-1 ↗
7. Park · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 340 · 23710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.12.003 ↗
8. Bossis · ASTM STP · 2002 · 1423 · 190
9. A. Yilmazbayhan, A.T. Motta, H.G. Kim, Y.H. Jeong, J.Y. Park, R.J. Comstock, B. Lai, Z. Cai, in: Proc. of 12th Int. Conf. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Systems-Water Reactors, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, August 14–18, 2005.
10. Granovsky · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 302 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(02)00718-3 ↗
11. Baberis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 326 · 16310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.007 ↗
12. Motta · J. ASTM Int. · 2005 · 210.1520/JAI12375 ↗
13. Yilmazbayhan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 349 · 26510.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.10.012 ↗
14. Pecheur · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 189 · 31810.1016/0022-3115(92)90385-X ↗
15. Pecheur · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 278 · 19510.1016/S0022-3115(99)00253-6 ↗
16. Takeda · ASTM STP · 2000 · 1354 · 592
17. Jeong · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 317 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(02)01676-8 ↗