Molecular dynamics study of Xe bubble re-solution in UO2
Source abstract
Abstract
In-pile diffusion of fission gas is generally modeled through an effective diffusion coefficient that must take into account various phenomena occurring at the grain scale. One of these relates to the trapping of gas by intragranular bubbles. This trapping is only temporary, because the gas is brought back into atomic solution through interactions with fission fragments or fast neutrons, the so-called resolution process. In this work, we investigate the resolution process with molecular dynamics techniques. For low-energy interactions (<50 keV), the collision cascades caused by a single fast moving primary knock-on atom (PKA) were studied. The higher energy range (up to 100 MeV total energy, but limited to an effective linear deposited energy between 10 and 40 keV/nm) was studied by the thermal spike method. The studies shed light on the atomic scale processes at play for fission gas resolution in nuclear fuel. The present atomic scale simulations indicate that low-energy interactions (PKA) are not effective in the resolution process. The high energy interactions destroy smaller bubbles completely and bring a quasi-constant number of gas atoms in resolution when they interact with larger bubbles.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. C. Grandjean, A state-of-the-art review of past programs devoted to fuel behavior under LOCA conditions – Part One. Clad swelling and rupture. Assembly flow blockage, Tech. rep., IRSN (2005).
2. C. Grandjean, A state-of-the-art review of past programs devoted to fuel behavior under LOCA conditions – Part Two. Impact of clad swelling upon assembly flow blockage, Tech. rep., IRSN (2006).
3. OECD/NEA (Ed.), Nuclear Fuel Behaviour under Reactivity-initiated Accidents (RIA) Conditions, NEA/CSNI/R(2010)1, 2010.
4. R. Yang, Topical Report on Reactivity Initiated Accidents: Bases for RIA Fuel Rod Failures and Core Coolability Criteria, Draft 2, Tech. Rep. 1002865, EPRI (2002).
5. Sugiyama · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 37 · 87710.3327/jnst.37.877 ↗
6. Fuketa · Nucl. Technol. · 2001 · 133 · 5010.13182/NT01-A3158 ↗
7. Cornell · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1969 · 30 · 17010.1016/0022-3115(69)90178-0 ↗
8. Turnbull · Radiat. Effects · 1980 · 53 · 24310.1080/00337578008207119 ↗
9. White · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1983 · 118 · 110.1016/0022-3115(83)90176-9 ↗
10. Lösönen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 280 · 5610.1016/S0022-3115(00)00028-3 ↗
11. Lassmann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 280 · 12710.1016/S0022-3115(00)00044-1 ↗
12. Olander · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 354 · 9410.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.03.010 ↗
13. Govers · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 374 · 46110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.10.005 ↗
14. Speight · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1971 · 38 · 23610.1016/0022-3115(71)90051-1 ↗
15. G. Pastore, P. Van Uffelen, L. Luzzi, Simulation of fission gas behaviour in UO2 nuclear fuel, Submitted to Defect and Diffusion ForumPaper 272/Proceedings DIMAT 2011 Conference, Dijon, France.
16. D. Lanning, C. Beyer, K. Geelhood, Frapcon-3 updates, including mixed-oxide fuel properties, Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-6534, vol. 4, PNNL11513, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2005).
17. Gulden · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1967 · 23 · 3010.1016/0022-3115(67)90128-6 ↗
18. Nelson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1969 · 31 · 15310.1016/0022-3115(69)90189-5 ↗
19. Turnbull · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1970 · 36 · 16110.1016/0022-3115(70)90140-6 ↗
20. Turnbull · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1971 · 38 · 20310.1016/0022-3115(71)90044-4 ↗
21. Turnbull · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1971 · 41 · 15610.1016/0022-3115(71)90075-4 ↗
22. Turnbull · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 107 · 16810.1016/0022-3115(82)90419-6 ↗
23. S.E. Lemehov, Thermodynamics of the high burnup UO2 structure formation and fission gas release, in: The International Topical Meeting on Light Water Reactor Fuel Performance, 1997.
24. Lösönen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 304 · 2910.1016/S0022-3115(02)00856-5 ↗
25. Hayashi · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 248 · 19110.1016/S0022-3115(97)00119-0 ↗
26. Delaye · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 348 · 24310.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.09.025 ↗
27. Terentyev · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 349 · 11910.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.10.013 ↗
28. Van Brutzel · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 358 · 20910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.009 ↗
29. L. Van Brutzel, E. Vincent-Aublant, Grain boundary influence on displacement cascades in UO2: a molecular dynamics study, J. Nucl. Mater. Article submitted for publication.
30. Bishop · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 2010 · 268 · 291510.1016/j.nimb.2010.05.007 ↗
31. Parfitt · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 381 · 21610.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.038 ↗
32. Schwen · J. Nucl. Mater · 2009 · 392 · 3510.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.037 ↗
33. Wiss · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 1997 · 122 · 58310.1016/S0168-583X(96)00754-9 ↗
34. Toulemonde · Radiat. Effects Defects Solids · 1993 · 126 · 20110.1080/10420159308219709 ↗
35. Toulemonde · Actz Phys. Polon. A · 2006 · 109 · 31110.12693/APhysPolA.109.311 ↗
36. Duffy · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 2009 · 267 · 305010.1016/j.nimb.2009.06.047 ↗
37. Bringa · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 1998 · 143 · 51310.1016/S0168-583X(98)00405-4 ↗
38. Bringa · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 1999 · 152 · 26710.1016/S0168-583X(99)00066-X ↗
39. Bringa · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 16550110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.165501 ↗
40. Devanathan · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 2007 · 255 · 17210.1016/j.nimb.2006.11.021 ↗
41. Tucker · Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. in Phys. Res. Sect. B: Beam Interact. with Mater. and Atoms · 2005 · 228 · 16310.1016/j.nimb.2004.10.040 ↗
42. Schwen · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 2007 · 256 · 18710.1016/j.nimb.2006.12.001 ↗
43. Huang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 399 · 17510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.01.015 ↗
44. Govers · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 366 · 16110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.070 ↗
45. Govers · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 378 · 6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.01.023 ↗
46. Morelon · Philos. Mag. · 2003 · 83 · 153310.1080/1478643031000091454 ↗
47. Geng · J. Alloys Compd. · 2008 · 457 · 46510.1016/j.jallcom.2007.03.030 ↗
48. Basak · J. Alloys. Compd. · 2003 · 360 · 21010.1016/S0925-8388(03)00350-5 ↗
49. Govers · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 405 · 25210.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.08.013 ↗
50. Ziegler · 1985 · vol. 1
51. Smith · Molecular Simulation · 2006 · 32 · 93310.1080/08927020600987201 ↗
52. Martyna · J. Chem. Phys. · 1994 · 101 · 417710.1063/1.467468 ↗
53. K. Refson, Moldy User’s Manual, Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford, .
54. Refson · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2000 · 126 · 31010.1016/S0010-4655(99)00496-8 ↗
55. Soullard · Radiat. Effects Defects Solids · 1978 · 38 · 13310.1080/00337577808233221 ↗
56. Soullard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1978 · 78 · 12510.1016/0022-3115(78)90511-1 ↗
57. Soullard · Radiat. Effects Defects Solids · 1978 · 38 · 11910.1080/00337577808233217 ↗
58. Soullard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1985 · 135 · 19010.1016/0022-3115(85)90077-7 ↗
59. Meis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 341 · 2510.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.01.001 ↗
60. Crocombette · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 2009 · 267 · 315210.1016/j.nimb.2009.06.042 ↗
61. Calder · Philos. Mag. · 2010 · 90 · 86310.1080/14786430903117141 ↗
62. Dufour · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 1993 · 5 · 457310.1088/0953-8984/5/26/027 ↗
63. Parfitt · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 2810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.046 ↗
64. Ham · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1958 · 6 · 33510.1016/0022-3697(58)90053-2 ↗
65. Verwerft · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 282 · 9710.1016/S0022-3115(00)00421-9 ↗