High-flux He+ irradiation effects on surface damages of tungsten under ITER relevant conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A large-power inductively coupled plasma source was designed to perform the continuous helium ions (He+) irradiations of polycrystalline tungsten (W) under International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) relevant conditions. He+ irradiations were performed at He+ fluxes of 2.3 × 1021–1.6 × 1022/m2 s and He+ energies of 12–220 eV. Surface damages and microstructures of irradiated W were observed by scanning electron microscopy. This study showed the growth of nano-fuzzes with their lengths of 1.3–2.0 μm at He+ energies of >70 eV or He+ fluxes of >1.3 × 1022/m2 s. Nanometer-sized defects or columnar microstructures were formed in W surface layer due to low-energy He+ irradiations at an elevated temperature (>1300 K). The diffusion and coalescence of He atoms in W surface layers led to the growth and structures of nano-fuzzes. This study indicated that a reduction of He+ energy below 12–30 eV may greatly decrease the surface damage of tungsten diverter in the fusion reactor.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Tanabe · J. Nucl. Fusion · 1994 · 5 · 120
2. Iwakiri · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 113410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00289-0 ↗
3. De Temmerman · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S7810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.012 ↗
4. Parish · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 62 · 17310.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.045 ↗
5. Efe · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 70 · 3103410.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.08.013 ↗
6. Iwakiri · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 113410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00289-0 ↗
7. Kajita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 418 · 15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.026 ↗
8. Kajita · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 09500510.1088/0029-5515/49/9/095005 ↗
9. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 23310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.007 ↗
10. Lhuillier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 417 · 50410.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.174 ↗
11. Miyamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S65710.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.008 ↗
12. Yang · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1095910.1038/srep10959 ↗
13. Lieberman · 2005 · 172
14. Miyamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 33310.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.098 ↗
15. Yang · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2014 · 325 · 7310.1016/j.nimb.2014.02.011 ↗
16. Parish · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 62 · 17310.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.045 ↗
17. Miyamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S65710.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.008 ↗
18. Kajita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 418 · 15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.026 ↗
19. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 455 · 20110.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.008 ↗
20. You · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 10300710.1088/0029-5515/54/10/103007 ↗
21. Becquart · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 19640210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.196402 ↗
22. Ohno · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S87910.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.190 ↗