journal article·2016-04

High-flux He+ irradiation effects on surface damages of tungsten under ITER relevant conditions

Lu Liu, Dongping Liu, Yi Hong, Hongyu Fan, Weiyuan Ni, Qi Yang, Zhenhua Bi, Günther Benstetter, Shouzhe Li

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A large-power inductively coupled plasma source was designed to perform the continuous helium ions (He+) irradiations of polycrystalline tungsten (W) under International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) relevant conditions. He+ irradiations were performed at He+ fluxes of 2.3 × 1021–1.6 × 1022/m2 s and He+ energies of 12–220 eV. Surface damages and microstructures of irradiated W were observed by scanning electron microscopy. This study showed the growth of nano-fuzzes with their lengths of 1.3–2.0 μm at He+ energies of >70 eV or He+ fluxes of >1.3 × 1022/m2 s. Nanometer-sized defects or columnar microstructures were formed in W surface layer due to low-energy He+ irradiations at an elevated temperature (>1300 K). The diffusion and coalescence of He atoms in W surface layers led to the growth and structures of nano-fuzzes. This study indicated that a reduction of He+ energy below 12–30 eV may greatly decrease the surface damage of tungsten diverter in the fusion reactor.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Ion-surface interactions and analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Tanabe · J. Nucl. Fusion · 1994 · 5 · 120
2. Iwakiri · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 113410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00289-0 ↗
3. De Temmerman · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S7810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.012 ↗
4. Parish · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 62 · 17310.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.045 ↗
5. Efe · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 70 · 3103410.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.08.013 ↗
6. Iwakiri · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 113410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00289-0 ↗
7. Kajita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 418 · 15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.026 ↗
8. Kajita · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 09500510.1088/0029-5515/49/9/095005 ↗
9. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 23310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.007 ↗
10. Lhuillier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 417 · 50410.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.174 ↗
11. Miyamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S65710.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.008 ↗
12. Yang · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1095910.1038/srep10959 ↗
13. Lieberman · 2005 · 172
14. Miyamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 33310.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.098 ↗
15. Yang · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2014 · 325 · 7310.1016/j.nimb.2014.02.011 ↗
16. Parish · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 62 · 17310.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.045 ↗
17. Miyamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S65710.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.008 ↗
18. Kajita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 418 · 15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.026 ↗
19. Li · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 455 · 20110.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.008 ↗
20. You · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 10300710.1088/0029-5515/54/10/103007 ↗
21. Becquart · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 19640210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.196402 ↗
22. Ohno · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S87910.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.190 ↗