journal article·2005-05

Effect of external gamma irradiation on dissolution of the spent UO2 fuel matrix

C. Jégou, B. Muzeau, V. Broudic, S. Peuget, A. Poulesquen, D. Roudil, C. Corbel

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 341· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Leaching experiments were performed on UO2 pellets doped with alpha-emitters (238/239Pu) and on spent fuel, in the presence of an external gamma irradiation source (A60Co = 260 Ci, D ˙ γ = 650 Gy h−1). The effects of α, β, γ radiation, the fuel chemistry and the nature of the cover gas (aerated or Ar + 4%H2) on water radiolysis and on oxidizing dissolution of the UO2 matrix are quantified and discussed. For the doped UO2 pellets, the nature of the cover gas clearly has a major role in the effect of gamma radiolysis. The uranium dissolution rate in an aerated medium is 83 mg m−2 d−1 compared with only 6 mg m−2 d−1 in Ar + 4%H2. The rate drop is accompanied by a reduction of about four orders of magnitude in the hydrogen peroxide concentrations in the homogeneous solution. The uranium dissolution rates also underestimate the matrix alteration rate because of major precipitation phenomena at the UO2 pellet surface. The presence of studtite in particular was demonstrated in aerated media; this is consistent with the measured H2O2 concentrations (1.2 × 10−4 mol L−1). For spent fuel, the presence of fission products (Cs and Sr), matrix alteration tracers, allowed us to determine the alteration rates under external gamma irradiation. The fission product release rates were higher by a factor of 5–10 than those of the actinides (80–90% of the actinides precipitated on the surface of the fragments) and also depended to a large extent on the nature of the cover gas. No significant effect of the fuel chemistry compared with UO2 was observed on uranium dissolution and H2O2 production in the presence of the 60Co source in aerated conditions. Conversely, in Ar + 4%H2 the fuel self-irradiation field cannot be disregarded since the H2O2 concentrations drop by only three orders of magnitude compared with UO2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radioactive element chemistry and processing · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Shoesmith · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 190 · 2010.1016/0022-3115(92)90072-S ↗
2. Shoesmith · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 282 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00392-5 ↗
3. Poinssot · Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2000 · 66310.1557/PROC-663-469 ↗
4. Jégou · Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 2004 · 807
5. Rondinella · Radiochim. Acta. · 2000 · 88 · 52710.1524/ract.2000.88.9-11.527 ↗
6. Cobos · Radiochim. Acta. · 2002 · 90 · 110.1524/ract.2002.90.9-11_2002.597 ↗
7. W.J. Gray, Effect of surface oxidation, alpha radiolysis, and salt brine composition on spent fuel and uranium dioxide leaching performance: Salt Repository Project, Pac. Northwest Lab., Richland, WA, USA, Report PNL/SRP-6689, 198810.2172/6783908 ↗
8. J.P. Grouiller, J. Pavageau, In synthesis on the spent nuclear fuel evolution, CEA R-5958 report (ISSN04293460), 2001, 616 p
9. Jégou · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 326 · 14410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.008 ↗
10. Matzke · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 189 · 14110.1016/0022-3115(92)90428-N ↗
11. Spinks · 1980
12. Hochanadel · J. Phys. Chem. · 1952 · 56 · 58710.1021/j150497a008 ↗
13. V. Trupin-Wasselin, Processus primaires en chimie sous rayonnement. Influence du Transfert d’Énergie Linéique sur la radiolyse de l’eau, PhD thesis, University of Paris-Sud-Orsay, France, 2000
14. V. Broudic, B. Muzeau, C. Jégou, M. Bonnal, A. Gavazzi, C. Marques, in: International Conference Atalante 2004, 21–24 June 2004, Nıˆmes, France, p. 2
15. Loida · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 238 · 1110.1016/S0022-3115(96)00338-8 ↗
16. R.S. Forsyth, The SKB Spent Fuel Corrosion Program, SKB Technical Report 97-25, December 1997
17. Christensen · Nucl. Technol. · 2000 · 131 · 10210.13182/NT00-A3107 ↗
18. Allen · 1961
19. P. Kirkegaard, E. Bjergbakke, CHEMSIMUL, a program package for numerical simulation of chemical reaction systems, Riso National Laboratory DK-4000 Roskilde Denmark, 20 November 1998
20. Christensen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 238 · 7010.1016/S0022-3115(96)00342-X ↗
21. Christensen · J. Alloys Comp. · 1994 · 213/214 · 9310.1016/0925-8388(94)90886-9 ↗
22. Christensen · Nucl. Technol. · 1998 · 124 · 16510.13182/NT98-A2916 ↗
23. Sattonnay · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 288 · 1110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00714-5 ↗
24. Gray · Radiat. Eff. · 1985 · 89 · 25710.1080/00337578508222509 ↗
25. Karasawa · Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 1991 · 37 · 193
26. Amme · Radiochim. Acta · 2002 · 90 · 39910.1524/ract.2002.90.7_2002.399 ↗
27. J. Van Der Lee, L. De Windt, CHESS Tutorial and Cookbook, Updated for version 3.0, Users manual Nr LHM/RD/02/13, École des Mines de Paris, Fontainebleau, France, 2002
28. T.J. Wolery EQ3/6: A software package for geochemical modelling of aqueous systems: package overview and installation guide (version 7.0) (UCRL-MA-110662 PT I ed.), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 199210.2172/138894 ↗
29. Vitorge · J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · P71310.1080/00223131.2002.10875566 ↗
30. Forsyth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 190 · 310.1016/0022-3115(92)90071-R ↗
31. Sunder · Nucl. Technol. · 1998 · 122 · 21110.13182/NT98-A2863 ↗
32. C. Jégou, A. Poulesquen, Calculation of alpha radiation dose rate in a water layer in contact with UO2 grain, personal communication
33. Gray · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1991 · 212