journal article·2016-06

Transmission electron microscopy investigation of the microstructure of Fe–Cr alloys induced by neutron and ion irradiation at 300 °C

M. Hernández-Mayoral, C. Heintze, E. Oñorbe

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Four Fe–Cr binary alloys, with Cr content from 2.5 up to 12wt%, were neutron or ion irradiated up to a dose of 0.6 dpa at 300 °C. The microstructural response to irradiation has been characterised using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Both, neutrons and ions, gave rise to the formation of dislocation loops. The most striking difference between ion and neutron irradiation is the distribution of these loops in the sample. Except for the lowest Cr content, loops are distributed mainly along grain boundaries and dislocations in the neutron irradiated samples. The inhomogeneous distribution of dislocation loops could be related to the presence of α′ precipitates in the matrix. In contrast, a homogeneous distribution is observed in all ion irradiated samples. This important difference is attributed to the orders of magnitude difference in dose rate between these two irradiation conditions. Moreover, the density of loops depends non-monotonically on Cr content in case of neutron irradiation, while it seems to increase with Cr content for ion implantation. Differences are also observed in terms of cluster size, with larger sizes for neutron irradiation than for ion implantation, again pointing towards an effect of the dose rate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Yvon · J. Nucl.Mater. · 2009 · 385 · 21710.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.026 ↗
2. Ehrlich · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2001 · 56–57 · 7110.1016/S0920-3796(01)00236-8 ↗
3. Dubuisson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 205 · 17810.1016/0022-3115(93)90080-I ↗
4. Matijasevic · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 377 · 10110.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.063 ↗
5. Matijasevic · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 377 · 14710.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.061 ↗
6. Mathon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 312 · 23610.1016/S0022-3115(02)01630-6 ↗
7. Maziasz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1989 · 169 · 9510.1016/0022-3115(89)90525-4 ↗
8. Malerba · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 382 · 11210.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.014 ↗
9. Fazio · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 31610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.020 ↗
10. Matijasevic · 2008
11. Ulbricht · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 407 · 2910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.005 ↗
12. Bergner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 46310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.05.023 ↗
13. Heintze · J. Phys. Conf. Ser. · 2010 · 247 · 01203510.1088/1742-6596/247/1/012035 ↗
14. Heintze · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 409 · 10610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.010 ↗
15. Kuksenko · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · 6110.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.042 ↗
16. Kuksenko · 2011
17. Kuksenko · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 16010.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.021 ↗
18. Pareige · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 456 · 47110.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.024 ↗
19. Lambrecht · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 654710.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.046 ↗
20. Was · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 300 · 19810.1016/S0022-3115(01)00751-6 ↗
21. Zinkle · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2013 · 88 · 47210.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.02.081 ↗
22. Mansur · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 206 · 30610.1016/0022-3115(93)90130-Q ↗
23. Jones · Int. Mater. Rev. · 2011 · 56 · 16710.1179/1743280410Y.0000000003 ↗
24. Sigmund · Radiat. Eff. · 1969 · 1 · 1510.1080/00337576908234453 ↗
25. Stoller · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mat. A. T. · 2013 · 310 · 7510.1016/j.nimb.2013.05.008 ↗
26. Standard · 1996
27. Hirsch · 1965
28. Edington · 1975
29. Jenkins · 2001
30. Kirk · Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. · 1985 · 315 · 41
31. Yao · Philos. Mag. · 2008 · 88 · 285110.1080/14786430802380469 ↗
32. Prokhodtseva · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 695810.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.007 ↗
33. Williams · 2009
34. Loretto · 1984
35. Hernández-Mayoral · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 399 · 14610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.11.013 ↗
36. Gelles · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 108&109 · 512
37. Zinkle · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 351 · 26910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.031 ↗
38. Robertson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 108&109 · 20910.1016/0022-3115(82)90489-5 ↗
39. Singh · J. Nucl.Mater. · 1997 · 249 · 10310.1016/S0022-3115(97)00231-6 ↗
40. Yoshiie · Mater. Trans. · 2005 · 46 · 42510.2320/matertrans.46.425 ↗
41. Kiritani · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 205 · 46010.1016/0022-3115(93)90110-K ↗
42. Kojima · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1988 · 155–157 · 124910.1016/0022-3115(88)90505-3 ↗
43. English · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 108&109 · 10410.1016/0022-3115(82)90477-9 ↗
44. Borodin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1993 · 207 · 29510.1016/0022-3115(93)90272-Z ↗
45. Trinkaus · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 249 · 9110.1016/S0022-3115(97)00230-4 ↗
46. Trinkaus · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 251 · 17210.1016/S0022-3115(97)00246-8 ↗
47. Anento · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 440 · 23610.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.087 ↗
48. Tapasa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 361 · 5210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.10.022 ↗
49. Arakawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 119410.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.263 ↗
50. Prokhodtseva · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 578610.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.032 ↗
51. Terentyev · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 116110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.269 ↗