journal article·2009-06

Deuterium retention and release in tungsten co-deposited layers

G. De Temmerman, R.P. Doerner

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 389· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A systematic study of the influence of the deposition conditions on the deuterium retention in co-deposited tungsten layers formed both by magnetron sputtering and in the PISCES-B linear device has been carried out. Experimental parameters such as the tungsten deposition rate, the incident particle energy and the substrate temperature are shown to affect the level of deuterium retention in the layers. A decreased retention for increased substrate temperature and deposition rates, and an increased retention for increasing incident deuterium particle energy are observed. A scaling equation is proposed to describe the influence of the conditions during the co-deposition process (surface temperature, incident particle energy and deposition flux) on the deuterium retention. In addition, the desorption kinetics of deuterium has been studied by TDS. Two desorption stages at 473–573 K and at 1073 K have been observed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Causey · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 300 · 9110.1016/S0022-3115(01)00732-2 ↗
2. Loarer · Nucl. Fus. · 2007 · 47 · 111210.1088/0029-5515/47/9/007 ↗
3. Naujoks · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1994 · 210 · 4310.1016/0022-3115(94)90221-6 ↗
4. Doerner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 3210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.059 ↗
5. Skinner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 48610.1016/S0022-3115(00)00643-7 ↗
6. Coad · Nucl. Fus. · 2006 · 46 · 35010.1088/0029-5515/46/2/018 ↗
7. De Temmerman · Nucl. Fus. · 2008 · 48 · 07500810.1088/0029-5515/48/7/075008 ↗
8. Causey · Phys. Scr. · 2001 · T94 · 910.1238/Physica.Topical.094a00009 ↗
9. Haasz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 107610.1016/S0022-3115(96)00663-0 ↗
10. Mayer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 230 · 6710.1016/0022-3115(95)00239-1 ↗
11. Katayama · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 164510.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.04.026 ↗
12. M. Mayer et al., J. Nucl. Mater., 2009, doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.087.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.087 ↗
13. Baldwin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 59010.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.09.043 ↗
14. Thornton · J. Vac. Sci. Instrum. · 1974 · 11 · 666
15. Wang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 299 · 12410.1016/S0022-3115(01)00679-1 ↗
16. Tokunaga · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 88710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.137 ↗
17. Kawasaki · Fus. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 48 · 58110.13182/FST05-A992 ↗
18. Schmid · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 67410.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.045 ↗
19. W. Eckstein, Calculated Sputtering, Reflection and Range Values, Report of the Max-Planck-Institute fr Plasmaphysik, IPP-Report 9/132, Garching, Germany (2002).
20. Causey · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 46710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00538-8 ↗
21. Poon · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 374 · 39010.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.09.028 ↗
22. R.P. Doerner, et al., Nucl. Fus., in press