journal article·2013-07

Empiricial scaling of inter-ELM power widths in ASDEX Upgrade and JET

T. Eich, B. Sieglin, A. Scarabosio, A. Herrmann, A. Kallenbach, G.F. Matthews, S. Jachmich, S. Brezinsek, M. Rack, R.J. Goldston

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The SOL power decay length ( λ q ) deduced from analysis of fully attached divertor heat load profiles from two tokamaks, JET and ASDEX Upgrade with carbon plasma facing components, are presented. Interpretation of the target heat load profiles is performed by using a 1D-fit function which disentangles the upstream λ q and an effective diffusion in the divertor (S), the latter essentially acting as a power spreading parameter in the divertor volume. It is shown that the so called integral decay length λ int is approximately given by λ int ≈ λ q + 1.64 × S . An empirical scaling reveals parametric dependency λ q / mm ≃ 0.9 · B T - 0.7 q cyl 1.2 P SOL 0 R geo 0 for type-I ELMy H-modes. Extrapolation to ITER gives λ q ≃ 1 mm. Recent measurements in JET-ILW and from ASDEX Upgrade full-W confirm the results. It is shown that a regression for the divertor power spreading parameter S is not yet possible due to the large effect of different divertor geometries of JET and ASDEX Upgrade Divertor-I and Divertor-IIb.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Wagner · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1982 · 49 · 140810.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1408 ↗
2. Hill · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 18210.1016/S0022-3115(97)80039-6 ↗
3. Eich · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 19500310.1103/PhysRevLett.91.195003 ↗
4. Devaux · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S86510.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.050 ↗
5. Wingen · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 17500110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.175001 ↗
6. Eich · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S85610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.079 ↗
7. Solano · Nucl. Fusion · 2008 · 48 · 06500510.1088/0029-5515/48/6/065005 ↗
8. Dunne · Nuclear Fusion 52 · 2012 · 123014
9. Eich · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 21500110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.215001 ↗
10. Herrmann · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2003 · 44 · 56910.13182/FST03-A399 ↗
11. Brezinsek · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S93610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.037 ↗
12. Kallenbach · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S1910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.105 ↗
13. Herrmann · Plas. Phys. Contr. Fus. · 2002 · 44 · 88310.1088/0741-3335/44/6/318 ↗
14. Loarte · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 58710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00590-X ↗
15. Stangeby · Nucl. Fusion · 2010 · 50 · 12500310.1088/0029-5515/50/12/125003 ↗
16. Loarte · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 1992 · 32 · 46810.1002/ctpp.2150320344 ↗
17. Wagner · Nucl. Fusion · 1985 · 25 · 52510.1088/0029-5515/25/5/002 ↗
18. Goldston · Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 01250310.1063/1.3280011 ↗
19. Makowski · Physics of Plasmas · 2012 · 1910.1063/1.4710517 ↗
20. R.Maingi et al., these proceedings.
21. G. Matthews et al., these proceedings.
22. R. Neu et al., these proceedings.
23. A. Scarabosio et al., these proceedings.
24. Goldston · Nucl. Fusion · 2012 · 52 · 01300910.1088/0029-5515/52/1/013009 ↗
25. Wischmeier · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S52310.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.02.020 ↗
26. Lipschultz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 77110.1016/S0022-3115(97)80138-9 ↗
27. Fenstermacher · Plas. Phys. Con. Fusion · 1999 · 41 · A34510.1088/0741-3335/41/3A/028 ↗
28. T.W. Petrie et al., these proceedings.
29. ITER Phys. Exp. Group, Nucl. Fusion 47, S203 (2007).
30. A. Kukushkin et al., these proceedings.
31. D. Whyte et al., these proceedings.
32. Green · Plas. Phys. Con. Fusion · 2003 · 45 · 68710.1088/0741-3335/45/5/312 ↗