Impurity effects on reduced-activation ferritic steels developed for fusion applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Reduced-activation steels are being developed for fusion applications by restricting alloying elements that produce long-lived radioactive isotopes when irradiated in the fusion neutron environment. Another source of long-lived isotopes is the impurities in the steel. To examine this, three heats of reduced-activation martensitic steel were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for low-level impurities that compromise the reduced-activation characteristics: a 5-ton heat of modified F82H (F82H-Mod) for which an effort was made during production to reduce detrimental impurities, a 1-ton heat of JLF-1, and an 18-kg heat of ORNL 9Cr–2WVTa. Specimens from commercial heats of modified 9Cr–1Mo and Sandvik HT9 were also analyzed. The objective was to determine the difference in the impurity levels in the F82H-Mod and steels for which less effort was used to ensure purity. Silver, molybdenum, and niobium were found to be the tramp impurities of most importance. The F82H-Mod had the lowest levels, but in some cases the levels were not much different from the other heats. The impurity levels in the F82H-Mod produced with present technology did not achieve the low-activation limits for either shallow land burial or recycling. The results indicate the progress that has been made and what still must be done before the reduced-activation criteria can be achieved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. R.W. Conn, E.E. Bloom, J.W. Davis, R.E. Gold, R. Little, K.R. Schultz, D.L. Smith, F.W. Wiffen, Panel Report on Low Activation Materials for Fusion Applications, UCLA Report PPG-728, University of California, Los Angeles, 1983
2. Butterworth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1988 · 155–157 · 57510.1016/0022-3115(88)90374-1 ↗
3. Butterworth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1991 · 179–181 · 13510.1016/0022-3115(91)90028-6 ↗
4. Murphy · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 191–194 · 144410.1016/0022-3115(92)90714-V ↗
5. A.B. Pashcenko, H. Wienke, D.W. Muir, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Trieste, Italy, 1997
6. Cheng · Fusion Technol. · 1996 · 30 · 118210.13182/FST96-A11963108 ↗
7. J. Kopecky et al., FENDL/A.2, UKAEA Report, 1996
8. Cheng · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 258–263 · 176710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00134-2 ↗
9. Grossbeck · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 253–258 · 177810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00228-1 ↗
10. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste, 10 CFR Part 61, Fed. Regist. 47 (248), 57446-82, 27 December, 1982
11. Oliver · Mém. Sci. Rev. Métallurg. · 1968 · LXV · 39
12. M. Tamura, private communication, 18 February, 199910.1023/A:1006618925507 ↗