journal article·2013-02

Helium retention and early stages of helium-vacancy complexes formation in low energy helium-implanted tungsten

P.E. Lhuillier, T. Belhabib, P. Desgardin, B. Courtois, T. Sauvage, M.F. Barthe, A.L. Thomann, P. Brault, Y. Tessier

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 433· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Tungsten has been selected as the material of the divertor of the ITER fusion reactor. In operation, tungsten will be submitted to high alpha particles bombardment. The consequence of helium implantation is a major issue for the reliability of tungsten components. The aim of the study was to investigate the behavior of helium implanted in tungsten at low energy and low flux. 320 eV Helium ions were introduced by plasma immersion at the flux of 2.5 1018 ion/m 2/s 1. The helium behavior was investigated by Nuclear Reaction Analysis and the evolution of the tungsten lattice by Positron Annihilation Spectroscopy (PAS). Helium-implanted tungsten exhibits a low retention rate (13.6% at 9.4 1019 He m 2) which decreases with the implantation fluence. The desorption of helium starts at low temperature (<400 K). SEM analysis after annealing over 973 K shows sparse pores probably due to bubbles opening at the surface. The creation of helium-filled defects in the near surface layer (0.5 to 20 nm) was followed by PAS. A low level of damages was introduced by 12 MeV proton irradiation, prior to He introduction and allowed to examine the influence of pre-existing defects on the helium trapping. The PAS results suggest that the early stage of the formation of helium-filled vacancy clusters does not require the presence of pre-existing vacancy and thus proceed from the trap mutation phenomenon.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Ion-surface interactions and analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Janeschitz · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 1995 · 220 · 7310.1016/0022-3115(94)00447-1 ↗
2. Toschi · Fusion Engineering and Design · 2001 · 56 · 16310.1016/S0920-3796(01)00577-4 ↗
3. Bolt · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2004 · 329–333 · 6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.005 ↗
4. Hino · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 1999 · 266–269 · 53810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00587-X ↗
5. Nishijima · Journal of Nuclear Materials Plasma – Surface Interactions in Controlled Fusion Devices 15 · 2003 · 313–316 · 97
6. Yoshida · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2005 · 337–339 · 94610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.162 ↗
7. Amarendra · Physical Review B · 2004 · 69 · 09410510.1103/PhysRevB.69.094105 ↗
8. Amano · Journal of Applied Physics · 1984 · 56 · 98310.1063/1.334039 ↗
9. Xu · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, B · 2003 · 206 · 12310.1016/S0168-583X(03)00697-9 ↗
10. Broeders · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2004 · 328 · 19710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.05.002 ↗
11. Sauvage · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2004 · 327 · 15910.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.02.002 ↗
12. Debelle · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2008 · 376 · 21610.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.03.002 ↗
13. Desgardin · 1999
14. Analysis of positron profiling data by means of “VEPFIT”
15. Valkealhati · Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing · 1984 · 35 · 5110.1007/BF00620300 ↗
16. Soininen · Physical Review B · 1992 · 46 · 1310410.1103/PhysRevB.46.13104 ↗
17. Lee · Journal of Nuclear Materials Plasma – Surface Interactions-17 · 2007 · 363–365 · 89810.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.111 ↗
18. Robinson · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 1981 · 103 · 52510.1016/0022-3115(82)90652-3 ↗
19. Becquart · Physical Review Letters · 2006 · 97 · 196402-110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.196402 ↗
20. Sharafat · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2009 · 386–388 · 90010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.318 ↗
21. Lee · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2007 · 360 · 19610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.09.013 ↗
22. M. Tokitani et al., Desorption of helium from austenitic stainless steel heavily bombarded by low energy He ions, in: Journal of Nuclear Materials Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fusion Reactor Materials (ICFRM-11), vol. 329–333(Part 1), 2004, pp. 761–765.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.177 ↗
23. Lhuillier · Physica Status Solidi (c) · 2009
24. C.S. Becquart and C. Domain, Ab initio calculations about intrinsic point defects and He in W, in: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms Computer Simulation of Radiation Effects in Solids – Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Computer Simulation of Radiation Effects in Solids (COSIRES 2006), Computer Simulation of Radiation Effects in Solids, vol. 255(1), 2007, pp. 23–26.
25. Becquart · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2009 · 385 · 22310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.027 ↗
26. Martin · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, B · 2007 · 258 · 47110.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.288 ↗
27. Wilson · Physical Review B · 1981 · 24 · 561610.1103/PhysRevB.24.5616 ↗
28. Paulin · Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing · 1974 · 4 · 34310.1007/BF00928390 ↗
29. Experimental methods of annihilation time and energy spectrometry
30. Troev · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms · 2009 · 267 · 53510.1016/j.nimb.2008.11.045 ↗
31. Nishijima · Journal of Nuclear Materials · 2004 · 329 · 102910.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.129 ↗
32. Abd El Keriem · Physical Review B · 1993 · 47 · 1477110.1103/PhysRevB.47.14771 ↗
33. Henriksson · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms · 2006 · 244 · 37710.1016/j.nimb.2005.10.020 ↗