Impact of the ITER-like wall on divertor detachment and on the density limit in the JET tokamak
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract L-mode and H-mode density limits with the ITER-like wall (ILW) have been investigated in the recent experimental campaign and compared with experiments in the JET carbon material configuration. The density limit is up to 40% higher in the JET-ILW than in the JET-CFC machine. This is linked to the formerly higher radiation fraction and, correspondingly, to earlier divertor detachment in the JET-CFC. In the ILW configuration, the discharge demonstrates a stable operation with a completely detached outer divertor in L- and H-mode. In contrary to the well-known “heating power independent” Greenwald limit, the L-mode densities limit increases moderately with rising heating power ( ∼ P heat 0.4 ) independently of the wall material. The H–L transition constitutes an effective undisruptive density limit for an H-mode plasma. Detachment itself does not trigger the H–L back transition and does not present a limit on plasma density. In the range of neutral beam heating 8–10.5 MW, no dependence of the H-mode density limit on the heating power was observed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Progress in the ITER Physics Basis, Edd., Nucl. Fusion 47 (2007) S1 sqq.10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/E01 ↗
2. G.J. van Rooij, These proceedings.
3. Matthews · Phys. Scripta · 2011 · T145 · 01400110.1088/0031-8949/2011/T145/014001 ↗
4. Rapp · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 114810.1016/S0022-3115(00)00553-5 ↗
5. Apicella · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 134610.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.237 ↗
6. Krasheninnikov · Phys. Plasmas · 1997 · 4 · 163810.1063/1.872268 ↗
7. Brezinsek · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 26710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.100 ↗
8. Loarte · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 11810.1016/S0022-3115(97)80035-9 ↗
9. McCracken · Nucl. Fusion · 1998 · 38 · 61910.1088/0029-5515/38/4/311 ↗
10. Huber · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 10D51110.1063/1.4731759 ↗
11. G.H. Golub, C.F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1983.
12. Fenstermacher · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1997 · 68 · 97410.1063/1.1147729 ↗
13. Huber · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 92510.1016/S0022-3115(02)01478-2 ↗
14. A.G. Meigs et al., These proceedings.
15. Huber · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 36510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.124 ↗
16. H.P. Summers, Atomic Data and Analysis Structure, .
17. Fujimoto · Plasma Fusion Res. · 2009 · 4 · 02510.1585/pfr.4.025 ↗
18. Loarte · Nucl. Fusion · 1998 · 38 · 33110.1088/0029-5515/38/3/303 ↗
19. M. Groth et al., These proceedings.
20. Rapp · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2008 · 50 · 09501510.1088/0741-3335/50/9/095015 ↗
21. S. Brezinsek et al., These proceedings.
22. Lipschultz · Nucl. Fusion · 1984 · 24 · 97710.1088/0029-5515/24/8/002 ↗
23. Fundamenski · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 30510.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.08.030 ↗
24. V. Philipps et al., These proceedings.
25. Greenwald · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · R2710.1088/0741-3335/44/8/201 ↗
26. Saibene · Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 113310.1088/0029-5515/39/9/307 ↗
27. Chankin · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · A39910.1088/0741-3335/44/5A/343 ↗
28. Rapp · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 313–316 · 52410.1016/S0022-3115(02)01455-1 ↗
29. Chankin · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 1999 · 41 · 91310.1088/0741-3335/41/7/305 ↗
30. Saibene · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · 176910.1088/0741-3335/44/9/301 ↗
31. Loarte · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2003 · 45 · 154910.1088/0741-3335/45/9/302 ↗
32. Borrass · Nucl. Fusion · 2004 · 44 · 75210.1088/0029-5515/44/7/007 ↗
33. Pasqualotto · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2004 · 75 · 389110.1063/1.1787922 ↗