journal article·2015-05

Radiation damage resistance and interface stability of copper–graphene nanolayered composite

Hai Huang, Xiaobin Tang, Feida Chen, Yahui Yang, Jian Liu, Huan Li, Da Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The radiation damage resistance and interface stability of copper–graphene nanolayered composite are studied by atomistic simulations. Results show that the number of surviving point defects in bulk region is always less than that of pure copper at 100 K, when the range of initial distance d between a primary knock-on atom (PKA) with 3 keV and copper–graphene interface is less than 4 nm. The above phenomenon also occurs at 300, 500, and 700 K when d is ∼15.4 A, thereby implying that the composite resulting from copper–graphene interfaces exhibits excellent ability to resist radiation damage. A higher PKA energy corresponds to worse radiation damage of graphene in the composite. The damage may impair interface stability and eventually weaken the radiation damage resistance of the composite.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Ackland · Science · 2010 · 327 · 158710.1126/science.1188088 ↗
2. Wirth · Science · 2007 · 318 · 92310.1126/science.1150394 ↗
3. Arakawa · Science · 2007 · 318 · 95610.1126/science.1145386 ↗
4. Yang · Sci. China Technol. Sci. · 2014 · 57 · 2910.1007/s11431-013-5444-6 ↗
5. Song · Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2014 · 94 · 36110.1080/09500839.2014.913105 ↗
6. de la Rubia · Nature · 2000 · 406 · 87110.1038/35022544 ↗
7. McPhie · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 437 · 22210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.02.015 ↗
8. Kaoumi · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 07352510.1063/1.2988142 ↗
9. Beamish · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2010 · 22 · 345006
10. Misra · JOM · 2007 · 59 · 6210.1007/s11837-007-0120-6 ↗
11. Liu · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 01210310.1103/PhysRevB.85.012103 ↗
12. Chen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 452 · 3110.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.04.039 ↗
13. Wei · Phil. Mag. · 2011 · 91 · 55310.1080/14786435.2010.526647 ↗
14. H.-X. Zhang, M.-Q. Hong, X.-H. Xiao, F. Ren, C.-Z. Nucl. Phys. Rev. 30 (2013) 451–459.
15. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 23190110.1063/1.4882085 ↗
16. Kim · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 211410.1038/ncomms3114 ↗
17. Plimpton · J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
18. Bai · Science · 2010 · 327 · 163110.1126/science.1183723 ↗
19. Demkowicz · Int. J. Appl. Mech. · 2009 · 1 · 42110.1142/S1758825109000216 ↗
20. Wu · Carbon · 2014 · 66 · 3110.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.027 ↗
21. Liang · Acta Scientiarum. Naturalium. Un. · 2013 · 49 · 365
22. Adamska · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 19544310.1103/PhysRevB.85.195443 ↗
23. Mao · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 16541010.1103/PhysRevB.87.165410 ↗
24. Pérez-Pérez · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B · 2000 · 164 · 48710.1016/S0168-583X(99)01141-6 ↗
25. Gao · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 249 · 7710.1016/S0022-3115(97)00178-5 ↗
26. Zhang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 06160410.1063/1.4817785 ↗