journal article·2013-07Open access

Helium effects on tungsten under fusion-relevant plasma loading conditions

G. De Temmerman, K. Bystrov, R.P. Doerner, L. Marot, G.M. Wright, K.B. Woller, D.G. Whyte, J.J. Zielinski

Abstract

Experiments were performed in the Pilot-PSI linear plasma device to study the formation of helium-induced nanostructures under high heat fluxes (>10 MW m-2), the erosion of a tungsten surface at the elevated temperatures where those structures typically form and most importantly the behavior of a helium-induced fibreform structure during ELM-like pulses. A strong correlation between the characteristic size of the helium-induced morphology and the size of the voids observed in the near-surface region has been found, and both increase in size with increasing temperatures. Temperature-dependent erosion of tungsten surfaces was observed despite the ion energy being below the sputtering threshold, with an exponential increase of the erosion for temperatures higher than 2400 °C. The same effect was observed during ELM-like plasma pulses. Finally, a complete disappearance of the tungsten fibreform structure was observed after only one plasma pulse for energy densities higher than 0.5 MJ m-2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Y. Ueda et al., J. Nucl. Mater. (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.10.023.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.10.023 ↗
2. Baldwin · Nucl. Fusion · 2008 · 48 · 03500110.1088/0029-5515/48/3/035001 ↗
3. Kajita · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 09500510.1088/0029-5515/49/9/095005 ↗
4. Li · Comput. Phys. · 2012 · 11 · 154710.4208/cicp.030311.090611a ↗
5. G.M. Wright et al., These proceedings.
6. De Temmerman · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 08150210.1063/1.3484961 ↗
7. De Temmerman · Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 07300810.1088/0029-5515/51/7/073008 ↗
8. Zielinski · Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 21 · 06500310.1088/0963-0252/21/6/065003 ↗
9. van der Meiden · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2008 · 79 · 01350510.1063/1.2832333 ↗
10. Krasheninnikov · Phys. Scr. · 2011 · T145 · 01404010.1088/0031-8949/2011/T145/014040 ↗
11. G. De Temmerman et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 30(4) (2012).10.1116/1.4731196 ↗
12. Kajita · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 418 · 15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.026 ↗
13. Bystrov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S14910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.067 ↗
14. Nishijima · Phys. Plasmas · 2011 · 18 · 01990110.1063/1.3532971 ↗
15. Tungsten: Properties, Chemistry, Technology of the Element, Alloys, and Chemical Compounds, Kluwer Academic 2010.
16. Conn · Nucl. Fusion · 2002 · 42 · 106010.1088/0029-5515/42/9/303 ↗
17. Doerner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 16610.1016/S0022-3115(00)00568-7 ↗
18. Doerner · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 447110.1063/1.1687038 ↗
19. Allain · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 20543410.1103/PhysRevB.76.205434 ↗
20. Psoda · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 74010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.206 ↗
21. Hechtl · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1991 · 179–181 · 29010.1016/0022-3115(91)90083-J ↗
22. Kajita · Appl. Phys. Express · 2010 · 3 · 08520410.1143/APEX.3.085204 ↗
23. Nishijima · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 60 · 144710.13182/FST11-A12703 ↗
24. Takamura · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S10010.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.021 ↗
25. Baldwin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2010 · 404 · 16510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.034 ↗