journal article·2003-03

ELM energy and particle losses and their extrapolation to burning plasma experiments

A. Loarte, G. Saibene, R. Sartori, M. Becoulet, L. Horton, T. Eich, A. Herrmann, M. Laux, G. Matthews, S. Jachmich, N. Asakura, A. Chankin, A. Leonard, G. Porter, G. Federici, M. Shimada, M. Sugihara, G. Janeschitz

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Analysis of Type I ELMs from present experiments shows that ELM energy losses decrease with increasing pedestal plasma collisionality ( ν ∗ ped ) and/or increasing τ Front ∥ , where ( τ ∥ Front =2π Rq 95 / c s ,ped ) is the typical ion transport time from the pedestal to the divertor target. ν ∗ ped and τ Front ∥ are not the only parameters that affect the ELMs, also the edge magnetic shear influences the plasma volume affected by the ELMs. ELM particle losses are influenced by this ELM affected volume and are weakly dependent on other pedestal plasma parameters. ‘Minimum’ Type I ELMs, with energy losses acceptable for ITER, where there is no change in the plasma temperature profile during the ELM, are observed for some conditions in JET and DIII-D. The duration of the divertor ELM power pulse is well correlated with τ Front ∥ and not with the duration of the ELM-associated MHD activity. Similarly, the time scale of ELM particle fluxes is also determined by τ Front ∥ . The extrapolation of present experimental results to ITER is summarised.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Superconducting Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 39 · 213710.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301 ↗
2. Zohm · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 1996 · 38 · 121310.1088/0741-3335/38/8/012 ↗
3. Leonard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 10910.1016/S0022-3115(98)00522-4 ↗
4. Janeschitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00623-1 ↗
5. A. Loarte et al., Fusion Energy 2000, ITERP/11(R), Proc. 18th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Sorrento, Italy, 2000, IAEA, Vienna 2001, ISSN 1562-4153
6. G. Federici et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01327-2
7. Loarte · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · 181510.1088/0741-3335/44/9/303 ↗
8. Leonard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 266–269 · 109710.1016/S0022-3115(00)00503-1 ↗
9. Leonard · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · 94510.1088/0741-3335/44/6/322 ↗
10. T. Eich et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01477-0
11. A. Herrmann et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01422-8
12. P. Ghendrih et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01476-9
13. Becoulet · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · A10310.1088/0741-3335/44/5A/306 ↗
14. H. Wilson et al., Proc. 28th EPS Conf. Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, Madeira, Portugal, 2001, P3.039