journal article·2023-10Open access

Empirical and mechanistic transient fission gas release model for high-burnup LOCA conditions

Nathan Capps, Larry Aagesen, David Andersson, Oliver Baldwin, W. Cade Brinkley, Michael W.D. Cooper, Jason Harp, Stephen Novascone, Pierre-Clément A. Simon, Christopher Matthews, Brian D. Wirth

Abstract

In response to the nuclear industry desire to extend burnup beyond current licensing practices, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) released a research information letter (RIL) that provides a basis for analyzing fuel fragmentation, relocation, and dispersal (FFRD) in light-water reactors. Of the five elements discussed, the most ambiguous is the significance of transient fission gas (FG) release (FGR) (tFGR) and its effects on fuel performance under loss-of-coolant accident conditions. In fresh fuel, FG migration and eventual release is primarily governed by diffusion-based mechanisms at higher temperatures (>1,000 °C). However, the mechanisms governing FGR changes as burnup increases. More recent research indicates that FGR increases as burnup increases, specifically under temperature transient conditions, and this release occurs at lower temperatures with a new release mechanism. This behavior has been attributed to microcracking in the fuel and is likely related to microstructure embrittlement with the presence of over pressurized FG bubbles. The NRC RIL outlines the complexity of the phenomenon and a need for a deeper understanding to adequately address FFRD for regulatory application. Therefore, this manuscript intends to summarize the publicly available tFGR data and discuss the observed dependencies (e.g., burnup, heating rate, sample geometry, terminal temperature). An empirical model has been developed and benchmarked against recently published experimental data. However, this empirical model is limited to conditions for which fitting data exist and, therefore, a high-level discussion is included to provide a roadmap for atomistically-informed multiscale modeling in conjunction with experimental data collection to develop a mechanistic tFGR model widely applicable to a broad range of nuclear fuel conditions at high burnup.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 2019
2. 2019
3. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2021. Interpretation of Research on Fuel Fragmentation Relocation and Dispersal at High Burnup. RIL 2021-13.
4. W. Wiesenack. 2013. Summary of the Halden Reactor Project LOCA Test Series IFA-650, OECD Halden Reactor Project. HPR-380.
5. W. Wiesenack. 2015. Summary and comparison of LOCA tests with BWR fuel in the Halden Reactor Project Test Series IFA-650. OECD Halden Reactor Project, HPR-383.
6. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. “Resolution of Generic Safety Issues.” NUREG-0933, Main Report with Supplements 1–33, Washington, DC, various dates.
7. US Code of Federal Regulations, Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for light-water nuclear power reactors, Title 10, Part 50, Section 46, January 1974 (amended).
8. Fuel Fragmentation, Relocation, and Dispersal during the Loss- of-Coolant Accident
9. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2017. “Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Light Water Nuclear Power Reactors.” 10 CFR 50.46, Washington, DC.
10. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2017. “Accident Source Term.” 10 CFR 50.67, Washington, DC.
11. Physics-Based Modelling of Fission Gas Swelling and Release in UO2 Applied to Integral Fuel Rod Analysis10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.12.002 ↗
12. R.L. Williamson, J.D. Hales, S.R. Novascone, M.R. Tonks, D.R. Gaston, C.J. Permann, D. Andrs, and R.C. Martineau. “Multidimensional Multiphysics Simulation of Nuclear Fuel Behavior.” J. Nucl. Mater. 423, no. 1–3: 149–163.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.01.012 ↗
13. Fission Gas Release Behavior from High Burnup UO2 Fuels under Rapid Heating Conditions10.1080/18811248.2006.9711208 ↗
14. Fission gas release behaviour of a 103 GWd/tHM fuel disc during a 1200°C annealing test10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.002 ↗
15. J.P. Hiernaut et al. “Fission Gas Release and Volume Diffusion Enthalpy Irradiated at Low and High Burnup.” J. Nucl. Mater. 294, no. (1–2): 39–44.10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00469-X ↗
16. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Fission Gas Release from UO2 up to 70 GWd/tU under Simulated LOCA Type Conditions
17. Contribution of high burnup structure to fission gas release under transient conditions
18. Marcet · 2010
19. Detailed characterization of a PWR fuel rod at high burnup in support of LOCA testing10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153881 ↗
20. An assessment of the fuel pulverization threshold during LOCA-type temperature transients10.13182/NSE14-20 ↗
21. Fission gas release behavior in high burnup UO2 fuels with developed rim structure10.1080/00223131.2002.10875557 ↗
22. https://mooseframework.inl.gov/bison/source/materials/Sifgrs.html.
23. Analysis of transient fission gas behavior in oxide fuel using BISON and TRANSURANUS10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.10.051 ↗
24. Modelling of fine fragmentation and fission gas release of UO2 fuel in accident conditions
25. An improved xenon equation of state for nanobubbles in UO210.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154089 ↗
26. Diffusion theory of fission gas migration in irradiated nuclear fuel UO210.1016/0022-3115(85)90071-6 ↗
27. A Calculation on the Migration of Fission Gas in Material Exhibiting Precipitation and Re-solution of Gas Atoms Under Irradiation10.13182/NSE69-A20676 ↗
28. A new fission-gas release model10.1016/0022-3115(83)90176-9 ↗
29. The development of grain-face porosity in irradiated oxide fuel10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.10.008 ↗
30. Modeling intra-granular fission gas bubble evolution and coarsening in uranium dioxide during in-pile transients10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152195 ↗
31. Modeling high burnup structure in oxide fuels for application to fuel performance codes. part I: high burnup structure formation10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152296 ↗
32. Modeling high burnup structure in oxide fuels for application to fuel performance codes. Part II: porosity evolution10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153627 ↗
33. The high burn-up structure in nuclear fuel10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70221-2 ↗
34. Seibert · 2022
35. Cluster dynamics simulation of uranium self-diffusion during irradiation in UO210.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151787 ↗
36. Modeling spatially dependent kinetics of helium desorption in BCC iron following He ion implantation10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.025 ↗
37. Hammond, K.D., Naeger, I.V., Widanagamaachchi, W., Lo, L.-T., Maroudas, D., and Wirth, B.D.. Helium flux effects on bubble growth and surface morphology in plasma-facing tungsten from large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ab12f6.10.1088/1741-4326/ab12f6 ↗
38. Blondel, S., Bernholdt, D.E., Hammond, K.D., and Wirth, B.D. Continuum-scale modeling of helium bubble bursting under plasma-exposed tungsten surfaces. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aae8ef.10.1088/1741-4326/aae8ef ↗
39. An object-oriented finite element framework for Multiphysics phase field simulations10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.07.028 ↗
40. Phase-field simulations of fission gas bubble growth and interconnection in U-(Pu)-Zr nuclear fuel10.1186/s41313-021-00041-5 ↗
41. Three-dimensional phase-field modeling of porosity dependent intergranular fracture in UO210.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109269 ↗
42. A phase-field model of quasi-brittle fracture for pressurized cracks: application to UO2 high-burnup microstructure fragmentation10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103348 ↗
43. Comparing the impact of thermal stresses and bubble pressure on intergranular fracture in UO2 using 2D phase field fracture simulations10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154158 ↗
44. Cladding swelling and rupture models for LOCA analysis
45. Fission gas release from UO 2 nuclear fuel: a review10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.08.019 ↗
46. Analysis of a Halden LOCA test with the BWR high burnup fuel
47. Analytical criteria for fuel fragmentation and burst FGR during a LOCA10.1016/j.net.2020.03.009 ↗
48. 2016
49. First elevated-temperature performance testing of coated particle fuel compacts from the AGR-1 irradiation experiment10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.11.021 ↗
50. Restructuring in high burnup UO2 studied using modern electron microscopy10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.05.077 ↗
51. Optical system for real-time monitoring of nuclear fuel pellets at high temperature10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110383 ↗
52. P. Doyle, J. Harp, B. Garrison, and K. Linton, “Development and Standup Testing of a System to Observe Fission Gas Release During Transient Heating of Nuclear Fuel Element Segments,” United States, 2022.10.2172/1869074 ↗
53. Integral LOCA fragmentation test on high-burnup fuel10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110811 ↗
54. Interpretation of Research on Fuel Fragmentation, Relocation, and Dispersal at High Burnup
55. INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, Advanced Fuel Pellet Materials and Designs for Water Cooled Reactors, IAEA-TECDOC-1416, IAEA, Vienna (2004).