Overview of experimental preparation for the ITER-Like Wall at JET
Source abstract
Abstract
Experiments in JET with carbon-based plasma-facing components have been carried out in preparation of the ITER-Like Wall with beryllium main chamber and full tungsten divertor. The preparatory work was twofold: (i) development of techniques, which ensure safe operation with the new wall and (ii) provision of reference plasmas, which allow a comparison of operation with carbon and metallic wall. (i) Compatibility with the W divertor with respect to energy loads could be achieved in N 2 seeded plasmas at high densities and low temperatures, finally approaching partial detachment, with only moderate confinement reduction of 10%. Strike-point sweeping increases the operational space further by re-distributing the load over several components. (ii) Be and C migration to the divertor has been documented with spectroscopy and QMBs under different plasma conditions providing a database which will allow a comparison of the material transport to remote areas with metallic walls. Fuel retention rates of 1.0–2.0 × 10 21 D s −1 were obtained as references in accompanied gas balance studies.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Pamela · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.056 ↗
2. Pitts · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 014001 · T138
3. Dux · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 85810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.225 ↗
4. Matthews · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 014030 · T138
5. Riccardo · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 014033 · T138
6. Ph. Mertens et al., this JNM issue.
7. H. Maier et al., this JNM issue.
8. Ciric · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 61010.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.07.046 ↗
9. Hirai · Phys. Scr. · 2007 · T128 · 14410.1088/0031-8949/2007/T128/028 ↗
10. Mertens · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 84 · 128910.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.11.055 ↗
11. Maier · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · 22210.1088/0029-5515/47/3/009 ↗
12. S. Jachmich et al., this JNM issue.
13. Nunes · ECA · 2009 · 33E · 2.16
14. G.Maddison et al., this JNM issue.
15. S. Brezinsek et al., 14th ICRFM Sapporo, 6–11th September 2009, in press, doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.097.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.097 ↗
16. E. de la Luna et al., 51st Meeting of APS Plasma Physics, Atlanta, November 2–6, 2009. .
17. Krieger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 11010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.131 ↗
18. M. Reinelt et al., this JNM issue.
19. Brezinsek · J. Nucl. Mater · 2005 · 337–339 · 105810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.114 ↗
20. Kreter · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 3810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.041 ↗
21. Widdowson · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 014005 · T138
22. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 2010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.039 ↗