journal article·2011-08

Overview of experimental preparation for the ITER-Like Wall at JET

S. Brezinsek, W. Fundamenski, T. Eich, J.P. Coad, C. Giroud, A. Huber, S. Jachmich, E. Joffrin, K. Krieger, K. McCormick, M. Lehnen, T. Loarer, E. de la Luna, G. Maddison, G.F. Matthews, Ph. Mertens, I. Nunes, V. Philipps, V. Riccardo, M. Rubel, M.F. Stamp, M. Tsalas

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 415· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Experiments in JET with carbon-based plasma-facing components have been carried out in preparation of the ITER-Like Wall with beryllium main chamber and full tungsten divertor. The preparatory work was twofold: (i) development of techniques, which ensure safe operation with the new wall and (ii) provision of reference plasmas, which allow a comparison of operation with carbon and metallic wall. (i) Compatibility with the W divertor with respect to energy loads could be achieved in N 2 seeded plasmas at high densities and low temperatures, finally approaching partial detachment, with only moderate confinement reduction of 10%. Strike-point sweeping increases the operational space further by re-distributing the load over several components. (ii) Be and C migration to the divertor has been documented with spectroscopy and QMBs under different plasma conditions providing a database which will allow a comparison of the material transport to remote areas with metallic walls. Fuel retention rates of 1.0–2.0 × 10 21 D s −1 were obtained as references in accompanied gas balance studies.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Pamela · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.056 ↗
2. Pitts · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 014001 · T138
3. Dux · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 85810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.225 ↗
4. Matthews · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 014030 · T138
5. Riccardo · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 014033 · T138
6. Ph. Mertens et al., this JNM issue.
7. H. Maier et al., this JNM issue.
8. Ciric · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 61010.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.07.046 ↗
9. Hirai · Phys. Scr. · 2007 · T128 · 14410.1088/0031-8949/2007/T128/028 ↗
10. Mertens · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2007 · 84 · 128910.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.11.055 ↗
11. Maier · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · 22210.1088/0029-5515/47/3/009 ↗
12. S. Jachmich et al., this JNM issue.
13. Nunes · ECA · 2009 · 33E · 2.16
14. G.Maddison et al., this JNM issue.
15. S. Brezinsek et al., 14th ICRFM Sapporo, 6–11th September 2009, in press, doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.097.10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.097 ↗
16. E. de la Luna et al., 51st Meeting of APS Plasma Physics, Atlanta, November 2–6, 2009. .
17. Krieger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 11010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.131 ↗
18. M. Reinelt et al., this JNM issue.
19. Brezinsek · J. Nucl. Mater · 2005 · 337–339 · 105810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.114 ↗
20. Kreter · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 3810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.041 ↗
21. Widdowson · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 014005 · T138
22. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 2010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.039 ↗