journal article·2023-02Open access

The response of accident tolerant fuel cladding to LOCA burst testing: A comparative study of leading concepts

K. Kane, S. Bell, N. Capps, B. Garrison, K. Shapovalov, G. Jacobsen, C. Deck, T. Graening, T. Koyanagi, C. Massey

Abstract

Accident tolerant fuel claddings seek to improve safety margins during loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) scenarios by reducing cladding steam oxidation rates, hydrogen production, delaying or mitigating cladding burst, and reducing cladding deformation. After rapid and extensive progress in recent years, Cr coated Zr-based alloys, ferritic FeCrAl, and SiC/SiC ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) have emerged as the most promising cladding concepts, but there are few studies comparing the accident tolerance of all three concepts simultaneously. In this study, LOCA burst testing has been conducted on Cr high impulse power magnetron sputtered Zry-4 (Cr/Zry-4), C26M (FeCrAl), and SiC/SiC SiGA (CMC). Experimental observations indicate Cr/Zry-4 burst at higher temperatures than Zry-4 however the effectiveness of the coating on mitigating ZrO 2 formation via Cr 2O 3 formation depended on physical proximity to the burst opening. No dramatic improvement in diametrical strain nor opening geometry was observed. C26M burst at higher temperatures than Zry-4 at lower pressures, exhibiting small amounts of strain and smaller openings, and formed slow-growing Al 2O 3 regardless of location. The CMCs did not burst or show any macroscopic signs of deformation, all the way up to an internal cladding pressure of 15.2 MPa. High temperature expanding Nb plug testing indicated that CMC room temperature strength may persist up to 1650°C, with an approximately 40% loss of strength at 1900°C. CMC steam oxidation was also compared to reference chemically vapor deposited SiC up to 1700°C, and CMCs were found to oxidize at slightly accelerated rates that were still orders of magnitude lower than bare Zry-4. Projected H 2 generation during LOCA burst testing showed that when accounting for cladding burst exposing inner diameters to steam, Cr coated Zry-4 reduced H 2 generation by a factor of two compared with bare Zry-4, while both C26M and SiC/SiC reduced H 2 generation by orders of magnitude relative to bare Zry-4.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Rickover · 2010
2. Accident tolerant fuels for LWRs: A perspective10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.12.005 ↗
3. Accident tolerant fuel cladding development: Promise, status, and challenges10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.12.043 ↗
4. High temperature oxidation of fuel cladding candidate materials in steam-hydrogen environments10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.05.047 ↗
5. W.J. Bryan, D. Jones, Wear resistant coating for fuel cladding (1993).
6. Early studies on Cr-Coated Zircaloy-4 as enhanced accident tolerant nuclear fuel claddings for light water reactors10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.02.018 ↗
7. Cr-coated cladding development at Framatome
8. Burst and oxidation behavior of Cr-coated Zirlo during simulated LOCA testing10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153679 ↗
9. Development of Cr cold spray–coated fuel cladding with enhanced accident tolerance10.1016/j.net.2017.12.011 ↗
10. Development of cold spray coatings for accident-tolerant fuel cladding in light water reactors10.1007/s11837-017-2643-9 ↗
11. Semi-integral LOCA test of cold-spray chromium coated zircaloy-4 accident tolerant fuel cladding10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.152940 ↗
12. Snead · 2014
13. Development and property evaluation of nuclear grade wrought FeCrAl fuel cladding for light water reactors10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.10.019 ↗
14. Cladding burst behavior of Fe-based alloys under LOCA10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.018 ↗
15. Strength and rupture geometry of un-irradiated C26M FeCrAl under LOCA burst testing conditions10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153242 ↗
16. Yamamoto · 2019
17. Current status and recent research achievements in SiC/SiC composites10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.003 ↗
18. Silicon carbide and its composites for nuclear applications–Historical overview10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151849 ↗
19. Ceramic gas turbine development: Need for a 10 year plan10.1115/1.3124669 ↗
20. Characterization of SiC-SiC composites for accident tolerant fuel cladding10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.020 ↗
21. Experimental design and analysis for irradiation of SiC/SiC composite tubes under a prototypic high heat flux10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.04.058 ↗
22. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of neutron irradiation effects in SiC/SiC composites using X-ray computed tomography10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109896 ↗
23. Handbook of SiC properties for fuel performance modeling10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.016 ↗
24. C-ring testing of nuclear grade silicon carbide composites at temperatures up to 1900°C10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.047 ↗
25. C.A. Back, Accident Tolerant Fuel: SiGA Components In-Core, in: Present. EPRI/INL/DOE Jt. Work. Accid. Toler. Fuel, New Orleans, LA, 2020.
26. Snead · 2015
27. Investigation of the C-ring test for measuring hoop tensile strength of nuclear grade ceramic composites10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.05.002 ↗
28. Oxidation of 3D-printed SiC in air and steam environments
29. Evaluating steam oxidation kinetics of environmental barrier coatings (JACERS-47841).)10.1111/jace.18093 ↗
30. Silicon carbide oxidation in steam up to 2 MPa10.1111/jace.13094 ↗
31. Chapman · 1978
32. Cladding swelling and rupture models for LOCA analysis
33. Kane · 2021
34. Quantifying deformation during Zry-4 burst testing: a comparison of BISON and a combined in-situ digital image correlation and infrared thermography method10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154063 ↗
35. The stressing for test purposes of materials in tubular form using elastomeric inserts—experimental and theoretical development10.1243/PIME_PROC_1982_196_014_02 ↗
36. Modeling environmental degradation of SiC-based fibers10.1111/jace.14086 ↗
37. Burst behavior of nuclear grade FeCrAl and Zircaloy-2 fuel cladding under simulated cyclic dryout conditions10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152256 ↗
38. Burst characteristics of advanced accident-tolerant FeCrAl cladding under temperature transient testing10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153488 ↗
39. Elastic properties of silica polymorphs-a review
40. System Zirconium-Oxygen
41. Material Selection for Accident Tolerant Fuel Cladding
42. An evaluation of high-temperature creep of zirconium alloys: data versus models
43. Measurement of Zircaloy-4 cladding tube deformation using a three-dimensional digital image correlation system with internal transient heating and pressurization10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110662 ↗
44. J.C. Brachet, M. Le Saux, V. Lezaud-Chaillioux, M. Dumerval, Q. Houmaire, F. Lomello, F. Schuster, E. Monsifrot, J. Bischoff, E. Pouillier, Behavior under LOCA conditions of enhanced accident tolerant chromium coated zircaloy-4 claddings, in: Proc. TopFuel 2016 Conf. Boise, ID, USA, 2016.
45. J.C. Brachet, M. Dumerval, V. Lezaud-Chailioux, M. Le Saux, E. Rouesne, D. Hamon, S. Urvoy, T. Guilbert, Q. Houmaire, C. Cobac, Behavior of chromium coated M5TM claddings under LOCA conditions, in: WRFPM 2017 Water React. Fuel Perform. Meet., WRFPM 2017 Water Reactor Fuel Performance Meeting, 2017.
46. Technology readiness levels for advanced nuclear fuels and materials development10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.11.024 ↗
47. Pasamehmetoglu · 2018
48. Physics and technology of magnetron sputtering discharges10.1088/1361-6595/abb7bd ↗
49. Comparison of plasma parameters and optical emission in DC, HIPIMS and hybrid DC+ HIPIMS modes of magnetron sputtering
50. Experimental investigation of cold-spray chromium cladding
51. Design, properties, and weldability of advanced oxidation-resistant FeCrAl alloys10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.009 ↗
52. Y. Yamamoto, Development and quality assessments of commercial heat production of ATF FeCrAl tubes, ORNL/TM-2015/478. (2015) 1–40.10.2172/1214517 ↗
53. Improved irradiation resistance of accident-tolerant high-strength FeCrAl alloys with heterogeneous structures10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117843 ↗
54. J. Lamon, Chemical vapor infiltrated SiC/SiC composites (CVI SIC/SIC), in: Handb. Ceram. Compos., Springer, 2005: pp. 55–76.10.1007/0-387-23986-3_3 ↗
55. King · 2022 · 2022
56. R. Oelrich, S. Ray, Z. Karoutas, P. Xu, J. Romero, H. Shah, E. Lahoda, F. Boylan, Overview of Westinghouse lead accident tolerant fuel program, in: Proc. TOP FUEL 2018 Conf. Prague, Czech Repub., 2018: p. A0036.
57. L. DUQUESNE, J. BISCHOFF, K. BUCHANAN, E. SCHWEITZER, K. NIMISHAKAVI, G. GIRARDIN, H. LONER, M. POUCHON, Framatome's evolutionary ATF solution: Feedback from the irradiation programs on PROtect's Cr-coated M5Framatome cladding, (n.d.).
58. T. V. Govan, Supplemental Guidance Regarding the Chromium-Coated Zirconium Alloy Fuel Cladding Accident Tolerant Fuel Concept, 2020.
59. J. Ribis, A. Wu, J. Brachet, E. Clouet, B. Arnal, E. Rouesne, S. Urvoy, F. Barcelo, A. Gentils, C. Baumier, L. Rancoeur, Y. Robert, F. Leprêtre, J. Bischoff, E. Pouillier, Chromium hardening and Zr-Cr interface stability of irradiated chromium-coated Zircaloy-4 alloy, (2018).
60. HRTEM and chemical study of an ion-irradiated chromium/zircaloy-4 interface10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.01.029 ↗
61. K.G. Field, M.A. Snead, Y. Yamamoto, K.A. Terrani, Handbook on the Material Properties of FeCrAl Alloys for Nuclear Power Production Applications (FY18 Version: Revision 1), Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States), 2018.10.2172/1474581 ↗
62. Path Towards Industrialization of Enhanced Accident Tolerant Fuel
63. Hydrothermal corrosion of SiC in LWR coolant environments in the absence of irradiation
64. Thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity of SiC composite tubes: the effects of microstructure and irradiation10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153217 ↗
65. Post-transient examination of performance of uranium silicide fuel and silicon-carbide composite cladding under reactivity-initiated accident conditions10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153520 ↗
66. S. Gonderman, Advances in SiGA® for Nuclear Applications, in: Present. 11th Annu. EPRI/INL/DOE Jt. Work. Accid. Toler. Fue, Charlotte, NC, 2022.
67. State-of-the-Art Report on Light Water Reactor Accident-Tolerant Fuels