journal article·2013-01

Experimental and modeling results of creep–fatigue life of Inconel 617 and Haynes 230 at 850°C

Xiang Chen, Mikhail A. Sokolov, Sam Sham, Donald L. Erdman III, Jeremy T. Busby, Kun Mo, James F. Stubbins

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 432· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Creep–fatigue testing of Ni-based superalloy Inconel 617 and Haynes 230 were conducted in the air at 850 °C. Tests were performed with fully reversed axial strain control at a total strain range of 0.5%, 1.0% or 1.5% and hold time at maximum tensile strain for 3, 10 or 30 min. In addition, two creep–fatigue life prediction methods, i.e. linear damage summation and frequency-modified tensile hysteresis energy modeling, were evaluated and compared with experimental results. Under all creep–fatigue tests, Haynes 230 performed better than Inconel 617. Compared to the low cycle fatigue life, the cycles to failure for both materials decreased under creep–fatigue test conditions. Longer hold time at maximum tensile strain would cause a further reduction in both material creep–fatigue life. The linear damage summation could predict the creep–fatigue life of Inconel 617 for limited test conditions, but considerably underestimated the creep–fatigue life of Haynes 230. In contrast, frequency-modified tensile hysteresis energy modeling showed promising creep–fatigue life prediction results for both materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. A review on current status of alloys 617 and 230 for Gen IV nuclear reactor internals and heat exchangers10.1115/1.3121522 ↗
2. Charit · JOM · 2010 · 62 · 6710.1007/s11837-010-0142-3 ↗
3. Murty · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 383 · 18910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.044 ↗
4. Tsuji · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1987 · 150 · 25910.1016/0022-3115(87)90002-X ↗
5. X. Chen, High temperature creep–fatigue behavior of alloy 617 and alloy 230, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 2012.
6. Special Metals Corporation, Inconel alloy 617, Paper No. SMC-029, 2005.
7. Haynes International Inc., Haynes 230 alloy, High-temperature alloys brochure, Paper No. H-3000H, 2007.
8. Stoloff · 1987
9. Holt · Int. Met. Rev. · 1976 · 21 · 110.1179/095066076790136762 ↗
10. ASTM Standard E2714, Standard test method for creep–fatigue testing, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, DOI: 10.1520/E2714-09.10.1520/E2714-09 ↗
11. G.R. Halford, Evolution of creep–fatigue life prediction models, in: 112th ASME Winter Annual Meeting, vol. 21, 1991, pp. 43–57.
12. Penny · 1995
13. R.D. Campbell, Creep/fatigue interaction correlation for 304 stainless steel subjected to strain-controlled cycling with hold times at peak strain, ASME Paper No. 71-PVP-6, 1971.10.1115/1.3428080 ↗
14. D.R. Eno, G.A. Young, T.L. Sham, A unified view of engineering creep parameters, in: Proceedings of 2008 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, PVP2008-61129, 2008.10.1115/PVP2008-61129 ↗
15. J. Wright, T.L. Sham, Creep–fatigue interaction diagram for alloy 617 in air at 950°C, Engineering Calculations and Analysis Report, TEM-10200-1, 2009, Rev. 03.
16. L.J. Chen, P.K. Liaw, R.L. McDaniels, G.Y. Wang, K. Liaw, J.W. Blust, S.A. Thompson, P.F. Browning, A.K. Bhattacharya, J.M. Aurrecoechea, R.R. Seeley, D.L. Klarstrom, Low-cycle fatigue behavior and creep–fatigue life prediction of three superalloys, Symposium on Modeling the Performance of Engineering Structural Materials II, 2001, pp. 101–117.
17. Abbaschian · 2009
18. R. Wright, Overview of the NGNP high temperature metals program, in: Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Research & Development 4th Annual Technical Review Meeting, 2011.
19. Ostergren · J. Test. Eval. · 1976 · 4 · 32710.1520/JTE10520J ↗
20. Chen · Acta Metall. Sin. · 2006 · 42 · 952
21. Matthew · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1991 · 39 · 150710.1016/0956-7151(91)90236-T ↗
22. R. Ghajar, J. Alizadeh K, N. Naserifar, Estimation of cyclic strain hardening exponent and cyclic strength coefficient of steels by artificial neural networks, in: ASME 2008 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, vol. 12, 2008. pp. 639–648.10.1115/IMECE2008-68643 ↗
23. Meurer · Nucl. Technol. · 1984 · 66 · 31510.13182/NT84-A33435 ↗
24. Totemeier · Press. Vess. Pip. Conf. · 2007 · 9 · 255
25. Hertzberg · 1996
26. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 601710.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.010 ↗
27. G.D. Smith, D.H. Yates, Optimization of the fatigue properties on INCONEL alloy 617, in: International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, 1991, GT-161.
28. L. Carroll, Creep–fatigue of alloy 617, in: Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Research & Development FY12 Technical Review Meeting, 2012.
29. Stocker · Int. J. Fatigue. · 2011 · 33 · 210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.008 ↗
30. Zrnik · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2001 · 319 · 63710.1016/S0921-5093(01)01030-9 ↗
31. Hyde · Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. · 1997 · 20 · 129510.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb01488.x ↗
32. S. Sham, ASME code and constitutive modeling, in: Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Research & Development 4th Annual Technical Review Meeting, 2011.