journal article·2015-07Open access

Small-scale characterisation of irradiated nuclear materials: Part II nanoindentation and micro-cantilever testing of ion irradiated nuclear materials

D.E.J. Armstrong, C.D. Hardie, J.S.K.L. Gibson, A.J. Bushby, P.D. Edmondson, S.G. Roberts

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the ability of advanced micro-mechanical testing methods, based on FIB machined micro-cantilevers, to measure the mechanical properties of ion implanted layers without the influence of underlying unimplanted material. The first section describes a study of iron-12 wt% chromium alloy implanted with iron ions. It is shown that by careful cantilever design and finite element modelling that changes in yield stress after implantation can be measured even with the influence of a strong size effect. The second section describes a study of tungsten implanted with both tungsten ions and tungsten and helium ions using spherical and sharp nanoindentation, and micro-cantilevers. The spherical indentation allows yield properties and work hardening behaviour of the implanted layers to be measured. However the brittle nature of the implanted tungsten is only revealed when using micro-cantilevers. This demonstrates that when applying micro-mechanical methods to ion implanted layers care is needed to understand the nature of size effects, careful modelling of experimental procedure is required and multiple experimental techniques are needed to allow the maximum amount of mechanical behaviour information to be collected.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Ion-surface interactions and analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Raj · MRS Bull. · 2008 · 33 · 32710.1557/mrs2008.67 ↗
2. Zinkle · Epj Web Conf. · 2013 · 5110.1051/epjconf/20135101001 ↗
3. Zinkle · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 73510.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 ↗
4. Murty · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 383 · 18910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.044 ↗
5. Was · 2007
6. Li · Phil. Mag. · 2012 · 92 · 204810.1080/14786435.2012.662601 ↗
7. Yi · Philos. Mag. · 2013 · 9310.1080/14786435.2012.754110 ↗
8. Armstrong · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 42810.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.044 ↗
9. Marquis · Mater. Today · 2009 · 12 · 3010.1016/S1369-7021(09)70296-2 ↗
10. P.D. Edmondson, A. London, A. Xu, D.E.J. Armstrong, S.G. Roberts, J. Nucl. Mater. (2015).
11. Chicot · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2007 · 27 · 190510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.06.011 ↗
12. Dao · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 389910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
13. Kiener · J. Mater. Res. · 2012 · 27 · 272410.1557/jmr.2012.303 ↗
14. Hosemann · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 23910.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.026 ↗
15. Heintze · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 417 · 98010.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.196 ↗
16. Hardie · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 433 · 17410.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.09.003 ↗
17. C.D. Hardie, S.G. Roberts, A.J. Bushby, J. Nucl. Mater. (2015)
18. Gong · Phil. Mag. Lett. · 2010 · 90 · 50310.1080/09500831003772989 ↗
19. Armstrong · J. Mater. Res. · 2009 · 24 · 326810.1557/jmr.2009.0396 ↗
20. Kiener · Int. J. Mater. Res. · 2009 · 100 · 107410.3139/146.110149 ↗
21. Kiener · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 381610.1021/nl201890s ↗
22. Gong · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 569310.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.064 ↗
23. Uchic · JOM · 2009 · 61 · 3610.1007/s11837-009-0038-2 ↗
24. Greer · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
25. Armstrong · Phil. Mag. Lett. · 2011 · 91 · 39410.1080/09500839.2011.573813 ↗
26. Di Maio · J. Mater. Res. · 2005 · 20 · 29910.1557/JMR.2005.0048 ↗
27. Howie · J. Mater. Res. · 2012 · 27 · 14110.1557/jmr.2011.256 ↗
28. Dugdale · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 470710.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.012 ↗
29. Kiener · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 60810.1038/nmat3055 ↗
30. Grieveson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2012 · 430 · 11910.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.06.014 ↗
31. Guo · Small · 2013 · 9 · 69110.1002/smll.201201614 ↗
32. Halliday · Adv. Mater. Res. · 2009 · 59 · 30410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.59.304 ↗
33. Rieth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 432 · 48210.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.018 ↗
34. Norajitra · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2011 · 86 · 165610.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.12.005 ↗
35. Zinkle · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2000 · 51–52 · 5510.1016/S0920-3796(00)00320-3 ↗
36. Matijasevic · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 157710.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.042 ↗
37. Malerba · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 442 · 48610.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.12.038 ↗
38. Kohyama · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233 · 13810.1016/S0022-3115(96)00327-3 ↗
39. J.F. Ziegler, M.D. Ziegler, J.P. Biersack, Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research section b-beam interactions with materials and atoms, 268 (2010) 1818–1823.
40. Piazzesi · J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. · 1973 · 6 · 39210.1088/0022-3735/6/4/023 ↗
41. Simmons · 1971
42. Madjasevic · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 377 · 14710.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.061 ↗
43. Stork · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 455 · 27710.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.014 ↗
44. Giannattasio · Phil. Mag. · 2010 · 90 · 394710.1080/14786435.2010.502145 ↗
45. Bushby · J. Mater. Res. · 2012 · 27 · 8510.1557/jmr.2011.304 ↗
46. Armstrong · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 10210.1063/1.4811825 ↗