journal article·2011-12

Lanthanides in metallic nuclear fuels: Their behavior and methods for their control

R.D. Mariani, D.L. Porter, T.P. O’Holleran, S.L. Hayes, J.R. Kennedy

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 419· Issue 1-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The thermodynamic and experimental basis is given for using dopant additives to bind lanthanides as intermetallic compounds in metallic nuclear fuels. Lanthanide fission products are a major factor in limiting the lifetime of the fuel, because they migrate to the fuel slug peripheral surface where they participate in fuel-cladding chemical interactions (FCCI) with the D9 or HT9 steel cladding. Lanthanide carryover in recycled metal fuels can accelerate FCCI, as recycled lanthanides would likely segregate from the fuel phase, putting the lanthanides in prompt contact with the cladding. In out-of-pile tests, the use of palladium was examined for binding the lanthanides, with palladium selected because of its known metallurgical properties in fuel-related systems and because of its known behavior in irradiated Experimental Breeder Reactor-II (EBR-II) fuels. Initial results confirmed that palladium may be expected to mitigate FCCI arising from lanthanides, and it has been recommended for in-pile tests. Transport phenomena responsible for lanthanide migration were also evaluated, and liquid-like behaviors were identified as being dominant. Liquid-like behaviors include transport with liquid metals, liquid metal solutions, and rapid surface transport of alloys/metals near their melting temperatures. The analysis led to establishing general criteria for selecting dopant additives and identifying tin, antimony, and tellurium as alternates for further testing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Radioactive element chemistry and processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. G.L. Hofman, L.C. Walters, Metallic fast reactor fuels, in: R.W. Cahn, P. Haasen, E.J. Kramer (Eds.), Materials Science and Technology, vol. 10, Nuclear Materials, Part I, VCH, New York, 1994, pp. 1–44.
2. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 16410.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.043 ↗
3. D.D. Keiser, The development of fuel cladding interaction zones in irradiated U–Zr and U–Pu–Zr fuel elements with stainless steel cladding, in: A. Aasen, P. Olsson (Eds.), Nuclear Reactors, Nuclear Fusion and Fusion Engineering, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2009, pp. 163–194.
4. R.D. Mariani, Dopants for high burnup in metallic nuclear fuels, US Patent Application No. 20110194667, August 11, 2011.
5. S. Pillon, et al., The FUTURIX-FTA experiment in Phenix, in: Proceedings of the global 2003 conference, New Orleans, LA, 16–20 November 2003, pp. 220–227.
6. Janney · Mater. Charact. · 2010 · 61 · 119410.1016/j.matchar.2010.07.012 ↗
7. See for example, H. Okamoto, Nd–Pd (neodymium–palladium), J. Phase Equilib. 13 (1992) 220–222. .10.1007/BF02667499 ↗
8. Leibowitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1989 · 167 · 7610.1016/0022-3115(89)90426-1 ↗
9. W. Zhang, G. Liu, K. Han, Ce–Fe (cerium–iron), in: T.B. Massalski (Ed.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second ed., vol. 2, 1990, pp. 1055–1059.
10. P. Nash, C.H. Tung, Ce–Ni (cerium–nickel), in: T.B. Massalski (Ed.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second ed., vol. 2, 1990, pp. 1085–1089.
11. Keiser · 2009 · 163
12. H. Okamoto, Cs–Pr (cesium–praseodymium), in: T.B. Massalski (Ed.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second ed., vol. 2, 1990, pp. 1384–1385.
13. Lamprecht · Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME · 1968 · 242 · 2169
14. Keiser · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 270 · 27910.1016/S0022-3115(99)00011-2 ↗
15. Zhang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 270 · 27910.1016/S0022-3115(99)00011-2 ↗
16. Nash · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 270 · 27910.1016/S0022-3115(99)00011-2 ↗
17. Kim · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 392 · 16410.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.043 ↗
18. P. Riani, D. Mazzone, G. Zanicchi, R. Marazza, R. Ferro, F. Faudot, M. Harmelin, On the Ce–Cu–Sn system, J. Phase Equilib. 19 (1998) 239–251; H. Okamoto, Phase Diagrams for Binary Alloys, Desk Handbook, vol. 1, 2000.10.1361/105497198770342256 ↗
19. R.I. Sheldon, E.M. Foltyn, D.E. Peterson, Sn–U (tin–uranium), in: T.B. Massalski (Ed.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second ed., vol. 3, 1990, pp. 3409–3410.
20. Okamoto · J. Phase Equilib. · 2001 · 22 · 8810.1361/105497101770339373 ↗
21. P. Chiotti, Sb–U (antimony–uranium), in: T.B. Massalski (Ed.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second ed., vol. 3, 1990, pp. 3314–3315.
22. H. Okamoto, Fe–Sb (iron–antimony), in: T.B. Massalski (Ed.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second ed., vol. 2, 1990, pp. 1763–1767.
23. H. Okamoto, Ce–Te (cerium–tellurium), in: T.B. Massalski (Ed.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second ed., vol. 2, 1990, pp. 1118–1120.
24. Okamoto · J. Phase Equilib. · 1993 · 14 · 12910.1007/BF02652178 ↗
25. M.G. Adamson, W.H. Reineking, M. Kangalaski, S. Vaidyanathan, Screening alternative LMFBR cladding alloys for fission product-induced LME and FCCI, in: Proc. of International Conference on Reliable Fuels for Liquid Metal Reactors, American Nuclear Society, Tucson, AZ, September 7–11, 1986.
26. Okamoto · J. Phase Equilib. · 1996 · 17 · 55010.1007/BF02666005 ↗
27. H. Okamoto, L. E. Tanner, Fe–Te (iron–tellurium), in: T.B. Massalski (Ed.), Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, second ed., vol. 2, 1990, pp. 1781–1783.