Ag diffusion in cubic silicon carbide
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The diffusion of Ag impurities in bulk 3C–SiC is studied using ab initio methods based on density functional theory. This work is motivated by the desire to reduce transport of radioactive Ag isotopes through the SiC boundary layer in the Tristructural-Isotropic (TRISO) fuel pellet, which is a significant concern for the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) nuclear reactor concept. The structure and stability of charged Ag and Ag-vacancy clusters in SiC are calculated. Relevant intrinsic SiC defect energies are also determined. The most stable state for the Ag impurity in SiC is found to be a Ag atom substituting on the Si sub-lattice and bound to a C vacancy. Bulk diffusion coefficients are estimated for different impurity states and values are all found to have very high activation energy. The impurity state with the lowest activation energy for diffusion is found to be the Ag interstitial, with an activation energy of approximately 7.9 eV. The high activation energies for Ag diffusion in bulk 3C–SiC cause Ag transport to be very slow in the bulk and suggests that observed Ag transport in this material is due to an alternative mechanism (e.g., grain boundary diffusion).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. D.P. Petti, TRISO-Coated Particle Fuel Phenomenon Identification and Ranking Tables (PIRTs) for Fission Product Transport Due to Manufacturing Operations, and Accidents, in, US, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 2004 (20555-0001).
2. Fuel Performance and Fission Product Behavior in Gas Cooled Reactors, IAEA-TECDOC-978, 1997.
3. H. Nabielek, SiC for fuel, in: 33rd ICACCS Discussion Group of Symposium 10 on silicon carbide, Daytona Beach, FL, 2009.
4. Nabielek · Nucl. Technol. · 1977 · 35 · 48310.13182/NT35-483 ↗
5. K. Verfondern, R.C. Martin, R. Moormann, Methods and data for HTGR fuel performance and radionuclide release modeling during normal operation and accidents for safety analyses, Jül-2721 Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, January 1993.
6. Amian · Nucl. Technol. · 1983 · 61 · 47510.13182/NT61-475 ↗
7. Friedland · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 389 · 32610.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.02.022 ↗
8. H.J. MacLean, Silver Transport in CVD Silicon Carbide, PhD Thesis, Department of Nuclear Engineering, MIT, Boston, 2004.
9. T.J. Gerczak, T.R. Allen, Z. Zhu, Fission Product Transport of Cesium and Silver in CVD-SiC, in: Embedded Topical on Nuclear Fuels and Structural Materials for the Next Generation Nuclear Reactors, ANS Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 2010.
10. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
11. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
12. Kresse · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
13. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
14. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
15. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
16. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
17. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
18. Kohan · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 61 · 1501910.1103/PhysRevB.61.15019 ↗
19. Li · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 08120110.1103/PhysRevB.74.081201 ↗
20. Lany · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 23510410.1103/PhysRevB.78.235104 ↗
21. Bockstedte · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 20520110.1103/PhysRevB.68.205201 ↗
22. Makov · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 401410.1103/PhysRevB.51.4014 ↗
23. Van de Walle · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 385110.1063/1.1682673 ↗
24. G. Kresse, M. Marsman, J. Furthmuller, VASP the GUIDE (accessed 12.05.10).
25. Choyke · Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 133 · A116310.1103/PhysRev.133.A1163 ↗
26. Erhart · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 20520310.1103/PhysRevB.73.205203 ↗
27. Janotti · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 16520210.1103/PhysRevB.76.165202 ↗
28. Castleton · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 17 · 2110.1088/0965-0393/17/8/084003 ↗
29. Alkauskas · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101 · 04640510.1103/PhysRevLett.101.046405 ↗
30. Clark · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 11531110.1103/PhysRevB.81.115311 ↗
31. Lany · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 11320110.1103/PhysRevB.81.113201 ↗
32. Rinke · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 02640210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.026402 ↗
33. Zywietz · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 1516610.1103/PhysRevB.59.15166 ↗
34. Casady · Solid State Electron. · 1996 · 39 · 140910.1016/0038-1101(96)00045-7 ↗
35. Wang · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 38 · 1275210.1103/PhysRevB.38.12752 ↗
36. Kim · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1986 · 133 · 235010.1149/1.2108406 ↗
37. Tachibana · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 67 · 637510.1063/1.345159 ↗
38. Van Ginhoven · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 348 · 5110.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.09.006 ↗
39. Torpo · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 08520210.1103/PhysRevB.65.085202 ↗
40. Aradi · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 24520210.1103/PhysRevB.63.245202 ↗
41. Gao · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B · 2001 · 180 · 28610.1016/S0168-583X(01)00430-X ↗
42. Mattausch · Physica B · 2001 · 308 · 65610.1016/S0921-4526(01)00782-7 ↗
43. Posselt · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2004 · 16 · 130710.1088/0953-8984/16/8/015 ↗
44. Lide · 2010
45. Pauling · 1939
46. Borg · 1988
47. Harrison · Trans. Farady Soc. · 1961 · 119110.1039/tf9615701191 ↗