Recent progress toward development of reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion structural applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Significant progress has been achieved in the international research effort on reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels for fusion structural applications. Because this class of steels is the leading structural material for test blankets in ITER and future fusion power systems, the range of ongoing research activities is extremely broad. Since, it is not possible to discuss all relevant work in this brief review, the objective of this paper is to highlight significant issues that have received recent attention. These include: (1) efforts to measure and understand radiation-induced hardening and embrittlement at temperatures ⩽400 °C, (2) experiments and modeling to characterize the effects of He on microstructural evolution and mechanical properties, (3) exploration of approaches for increasing the high-temperature (>550 °C) creep resistance by introduction of a high-density of nanometer scale dispersoids or precipitates in the microstructure, (4) progress toward structural design criteria to account for loading conditions involving both creep and fatigue, and (5) development of nondestructive examination methods for flaw detection and evaluation.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Jitsukawa · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 3910.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.319 ↗
2. Baluc · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 3310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.036 ↗
3. Baluc · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · S69610.1088/0029-5515/47/10/S18 ↗
4. Yamamoto · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 356 · 2710.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.041 ↗
5. E. Lucon, W. Vandermeulen, J. Nucl. Mater., these Proceedings.
6. E. Lucon, W. Vandermeulen, SCK•CEN Open Report BLG-1042 Rev. (1) (2007).
7. van der Schaaf · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 386–388 · 23610.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.329 ↗
8. J.-W. Rensman, J. Nucl. Mater., these Proceedings.
9. P. Spätig, R. Stoenescu, P. Mueller, et al., J. Nucl. Mater., these Proceedings.
10. Whapman · Phil. Mag. · 1960 · 5 · 23710.1080/14786436008235839 ↗
11. Odette · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 31310.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.023 ↗
12. Odette · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 56110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.045 ↗
13. P. Mueller, P. Spätig, R. Bonadé, et al., J. Nucl. Mater., these Proceedings.
14. R.L. Klueh, M.A. Sokolov, K. Shiba, J. Nucl. Mater., these Proceedings.
15. Sokolov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 6810.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.165 ↗
16. Schroeder · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1983 · 117 · 28710.1016/0022-3115(83)90036-3 ↗
17. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 357 · 15610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.048 ↗
18. Klueh · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2006 · 357 · 16910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.049 ↗
19. Kurtz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 41710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.121 ↗
20. Fu · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 06411710.1103/PhysRevB.72.064117 ↗
21. Seletskaia · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 04640310.1103/PhysRevLett.94.046403 ↗
22. Seletskaia · J. Nucl. Mat. · 2006 · 351 · 10910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.016 ↗
23. Morishita · Phil. Mag. · 2007 · 87 · 113910.1080/14786430601096910 ↗
24. Ventelon · J. Nucl. Mat. · 2006 · 351 · 11910.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.029 ↗
25. Heinisch · J. Nucl. Mat. · 2007 · 367–370 · 31110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.035 ↗
26. Wirth · J. Nuc. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 10310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.156 ↗
27. Borodin · J. Nuc. Mater. · 2007 · 362 · 16110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.019 ↗
28. Schäublin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 362 · 15210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.187 ↗
29. Odette · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
30. Lindau · Fusion Eng. Design · 2005 · 75–79 · 98910.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.186 ↗
31. de Carlan · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 23810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.017 ↗
32. Klueh · Scripta Mat. · 2005 · 53 · 27510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.019 ↗
33. R.L. Klueh, unpublished research.
34. S. Jitsukawa, F.W. Wiffen, R.E. Stoller, et al., J. Nucl. Mater., these Proceedings.
35. Tavassoli · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 25710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.020 ↗
36. Giancarli · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 127110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.234 ↗
37. J.-F. Salavy, L.V. Boccaccini, G. De Dinechina et al., J. Nucl. Mater., these Proceedings.
38. J. Aktaa, M. Weick, C. Petersen, J. Nucl. Mater., these Proceedings.
39. Fournier · Int. J. Fatigue · 2008 · 30 · 64910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.05.007 ↗
40. Fournier · Int. J. Fatigue · 2008 · 30 · 66310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.05.008 ↗
41. B. Fournier, M. Sauzay, C. Caës, et al., Int. J. Fatigue (2008), doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.006.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.006 ↗
42. Dubey · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 406 · 15210.1016/j.msea.2005.06.029 ↗
43. Orlová · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1998 · 245 · 3910.1016/S0921-5093(97)00708-9 ↗
44. Sklenicka · Mater. Char. · 2003 · 51 · 3510.1016/j.matchar.2003.09.012 ↗
45. Sunyk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367–370 · 140410.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.04.041 ↗
46. Cardella · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 13310.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.014 ↗
47. Bush · J. Press. Vessel Tech. · 1988 · 110 · 22510.1115/1.3265593 ↗
48. Gurieva · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1996 · 233–237 · 91810.1016/S0022-3115(96)00026-8 ↗
49. Jones · Fus. Eng. and Design · 2000 · 51&52 · 98510.1016/S0920-3796(00)00412-9 ↗
50. Onozuka · Fus. Eng. and Design · 2001 · 55 · 39710.1016/S0920-3796(01)00185-5 ↗
51. Merola · Fus. Eng. and Design · 2002 · 61&62 · 14110.1016/S0920-3796(02)00155-2 ↗
52. Ioki · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2004 · 329–333 · 3110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.003 ↗
53. Onozuka · Fus. Eng. and Design · 2005 · 75–79 · 59510.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.238 ↗