journal article·2000-08

In situ XRD analysis of the oxide layers formed by oxidation at 743 K on Zircaloy 4 and Zr–1NbO

N. Pétigny, P. Barberis, C. Lemaignan, Ch. Valot, M. Lallemant

Journal of Nuclear Materials· Volume 280· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Two alloys, having different oxidation behaviour (Zy4 and Zr–1NbO), have been investigated during oxidation at high temperature (743 K) and low oxygen pressure (10 kPa) by in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD). Tetragonal phase content and ‘pseudo-stresses’ on the monoclinic phase have been measured as a function of the oxide layer thickness. The tetragonal phase contents are similar for both alloys and decreased with the oxide layer thickness. Pseudo-stresses were much more compressive on Zr–1NbO alloy, with limited changes at the corrosion kinetics transition. On cooling, the tetragonal fractions do not change, while ‘pseudo-stresses’ decreased in different ways for the two alloys. With respect to stress analysis, no correlation was found between ‘pseudo-stresses’ and tetragonal phase content. In addition, due to the thermoelastic properties of the highly anisotropic phases of the zirconia, large internal thermal stresses are expected to develop during any temperature changes. The orders of magnitude of them are similar to the stresses induced by swelling during oxidation from Zr to ZrO2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. A.J.G. Maroto et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 229 (1996) 7910.1016/0022-3115(95)00233-2 ↗
2. B. Cox, Adv. in Corrosion Sci. and Tech., Plenum, New York, 1976, p. 17310.1007/978-1-4615-9062-0_3 ↗
3. B. Cox, V.G. Kritsky, C. Lemaignan et al., Waterside corrosion of zirconium alloys in nuclear power plants, TecDoc 996, IAEA, 1998
4. Adams · J. Nucl. Energy A · 1959 · 11 · 31
5. G. Wilmark et al., ASTM-STP 1295 (1995) 55
6. F. Garzarolli et al., ASTM-STP 1132 (1991) 395
7. David · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1971 · 38 · 32910.1016/0022-3115(71)90062-6 ↗
8. Klug · 1954
9. Garvie · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1972 · 55 · 30310.1111/j.1151-2916.1972.tb11290.x ↗
10. Valot · Oxid. Met. · 1997 · 48 · 32910.1007/BF01670506 ↗
11. Bossis · ASTM-STP · 2000 · 1354 · 918
12. Iltis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 224 · 10910.1016/0022-3115(95)00070-4 ↗
13. J. Godlewski et al., ASTM-STP 1132 (1991) 416
14. Garzarolli · ASTM-STP · 1991 · 1132 · 395
15. J.L. Bechade et al., High Temp. Mater. Process. 2 (1998) 35910.1615/HighTempMatProc.v2.i3.50 ↗
16. Hauk · Adv. X-ray Anal. · 1997 · 39 · 18110.1007/978-1-4615-5377-9_22 ↗
17. Parise · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 256 · 3510.1016/S0022-3115(98)00045-2 ↗
18. Lin · Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. · 1994 · 343 · 48710.1557/PROC-343-487 ↗
19. J.L. Béchade et al., in: Proc. ICRS-5, Linköping, Sweden, 16–18 June 1997
20. Kröner · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1967 · 15 · 31910.1016/0022-5096(67)90026-9 ↗
21. Reuss · Math. Mech. · 1929 · 9 · 49
22. Huntz · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 1988 · 4 · 107910.1179/mst.1988.4.12.1079 ↗
23. Roy · Oxid. Met. · 1970 · 2 · 23510.1007/BF00614620 ↗
24. Godlewski · ASTM-STP · 2000 · 1354 · 877
25. Y.S. Touloukian et al., Thermophysical Properties of Matter: Thermal Expansion, vol. 13, Plenum, New York, 1975, p. 451
26. Sheu · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1993 · 76 · 177210.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb06646.x ↗
27. Scardi · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1992 · 75 · 282810.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb05512.x ↗
28. M.V. Nevitt et al., Physica B 150 (1988) 23010.1016/0378-4363(88)90126-X ↗
29. S. Chan et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (1991) 174210.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07177.x ↗
30. Parise · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 256 · 3510.1016/S0022-3115(98)00045-2 ↗
31. Barberis · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 226 · 3410.1016/0022-3115(95)00108-5 ↗
32. Mardon · ASTM-STP · 2000 · 1354 · 505