Plasma-surface interaction in the Be/W environment: Conclusions drawn from the JET-ILW for ITER
Source abstract
Abstract
The JET ITER-Like Wall experiment (JET-ILW) provides an ideal test bed to investigate plasma-surface interaction (PSI) and plasma operation with the ITER plasma-facing material selection employing beryllium in the main chamber and tungsten in the divertor. The main PSI processes: material erosion and migration, (b) fuel recycling and retention, (c) impurity concentration and radiation have be1en studied and compared between JET-C and JET-ILW. The current physics understanding of these key processes in the JET-ILW revealed that both interpretation of previously obtained carbon results (JET-C) and predictions to ITER need to be revisited. The impact of the first-wall material on the plasma was underestimated. Main observations are: (a) low primary erosion source in H-mode plasmas and reduction of the material migration from the main chamber to the divertor (factor7) as well as within the divertor from plasma-facing to remote areas (factor30-50). The energetic threshold for beryllium sputtering minimises the primary erosion source and inhibits multi-step re-erosion in the divertor. The physical sputtering yield of tungsten is low as 10-5 and determined by beryllium ions. (b) Reduction of the long-term fuel retention (factor10-20) in JET-ILW with respect to JET-C. The remaining retention is caused by implantation and co-deposition with beryllium and residual impurities. Outgassing has gained importance and impacts on the recycling properties of beryllium and tungsten. (c) The low effective plasma charge (Zeff=1.2) and low radiation capability of beryllium reveal the bare deuterium plasma physics. Moderate nitrogen seeding, reaching Zeff=1.6, restores in particular the confinement and the L-H threshold behaviour. ITER-compatible divertor conditions with stable semi-detachment were obtained owing to a higher density limit with ILW. Overall JET demonstrated successful plasma operation in the Be/W material combination and confirms its advantageous PSI behaviour and gives strong support to the ITER material selection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Loarte · Nucl. Fus. · 2007 · 47 · S20310.1088/0029-5515/47/6/S04 ↗
2. Saibene · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fus. · 2002 · 44 · 176910.1088/0741-3335/44/9/301 ↗
3. Matthews · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.075 ↗
4. Roth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.037 ↗
5. V. Arunasalam et al., Recent Results from the PLT tokamak, in: Proc. 8th Conf. EPS, Prague, vol. 2, 1977, pp. 17–28.
6. Lipschultz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363 · 111010.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.227 ↗
7. Neu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S3410.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.006 ↗
8. Pospieszczyk · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 94710.1016/S0022-3115(00)00656-5 ↗
9. R.A. Pitts et al., 55th APS Meeting (2014), Denver, CO, USA, paper WE1.00001.
10. de Temmerman · Nucl. Fus. · 2008 · 48 · 07500810.1088/0029-5515/48/7/075008 ↗
11. Dux · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 85810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.225 ↗
12. Philipps · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2010 · 85 · 158110.1016/j.fusengdes.2010.04.048 ↗
13. Matthews · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.282 ↗
14. Brezinsek · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S93610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.037 ↗
15. Brezinsek · Nucl. Fus. · 2013 · 53 · 08302310.1088/0029-5515/53/8/083023 ↗
16. Joffrin · Nucl. Fus. · 2014 · 54 · 01301110.1088/0029-5515/54/1/013011 ↗
17. Brezinsek · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S30310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.122 ↗
18. Widdowson · Phys. Scr. · 2014 · T159 · 01401010.1088/0031-8949/2014/T159/014010 ↗
19. Coenen · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 7810.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.08.062 ↗
20. Beurskens · Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. · 2013 · 55 · 12404310.1088/0741-3335/55/12/124043 ↗
21. Giroud · Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. · 2015 · 57 · 1403910.1088/0741-3335/57/3/035004 ↗
22. Matthews · Phys. Scr. · 2011 · T145 · 01400110.1088/0031-8949/2011/T145/014001 ↗
23. Nunes · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2007 · 82 · 184610.1016/j.fusengdes.2007.04.047 ↗
24. Riccardo · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · T38 · 01403310.1088/0031-8949/2009/T138/014033 ↗
25. Arnoux · Phys. Scr. · 2014 · T159 · 01400910.1088/0031-8949/2014/T159/014009 ↗
26. Horacek · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 38510.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.132 ↗
27. Douai · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S117210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.259 ↗
28. de Vries · Nucl. Fus. · 2013 · 53 · 05300310.1088/0029-5515/53/5/053003 ↗
29. W. Eckstein et al., Report IPP 9/132, 2002.
30. Brezinsek · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 10300110.1088/0029-5515/54/10/103001 ↗
31. Borodin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S26710.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.043 ↗
32. Borodin · Phys. Scr. · 2011 · T145 · 01400810.1088/0031-8949/2011/T145/014008 ↗
33. Björkas · New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 12301710.1088/1367-2630/11/12/123017 ↗
34. Doerner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S27210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.045 ↗
35. A. Baron-Wiechec et al., this conference.
36. Krieger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S26210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.042 ↗
37. Pitts · Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. · 2005 · 47 · B30310.1088/0741-3335/47/12B/S22 ↗
38. Krat · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 456 · 10610.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.08.010 ↗
39. Mayer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S78010.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.167 ↗
40. Kirschner · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 11610.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.072 ↗
41. H.G. Esser et al., this conference.
42. K. Heinola et al., this conference.
43. Petersson · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 81410.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.077 ↗
44. Ivanova · Phys. Scr. · 2014 · T159 · 01401110.1088/0031-8949/2014/T159/014011 ↗
45. van Rooij · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S4210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.007 ↗
46. Brezinsek · Phys. Scr. · 2011 · T145 · 01401610.1088/0031-8949/2011/T145/014016 ↗
47. Pütterich · Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. · 2013 · 55 · 12403610.1088/0741-3335/55/12/124036 ↗
48. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 2010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.039 ↗
49. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S10810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.017 ↗
50. Philipps · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S106710.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.234 ↗
51. Philipps · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1993 · 11 · 43710.1116/1.578750 ↗
52. Loarer · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 111710.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.012 ↗
53. Wauters · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 110410.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.097 ↗
54. Romanelli-Grünhagen · Phys. Scr. · 2014 · T159 · 01406810.1088/0031-8949/2014/T159/014068 ↗
55. Doerner · Nucl. Fus. · 2009 · 49 · 03500210.1088/0029-5515/49/3/035002 ↗
56. Schmid · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S28410.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.105 ↗
57. Schmid · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 6610.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.109 ↗
58. Sieglin · Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. · 2013 · 55 · 12403910.1088/0741-3335/55/12/124039 ↗
59. Harting · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 49310.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.12.023 ↗
60. Coenen · Nucl. Fus. · 2013 · 53 · 07304310.1088/0029-5515/53/7/073043 ↗
61. Kallenbach · Nucl. Fus. · 2009 · 49 · 04500710.1088/0029-5515/49/4/045007 ↗
62. Maggi · Nucl. Fus. · 2014 · 54 · 02300710.1088/0029-5515/54/2/023007 ↗
63. C.F. Maggi et al., presented at the EPS 2014.
64. Giroud · Nucl. Fus. · 2013 · 53 · 11302510.1088/0029-5515/53/11/113025 ↗
65. Kallenbach · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2011 · 415 · S1910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.11.105 ↗
66. Groth · Nucl. Fus. · 2013 · 53 · 08303210.1088/0029-5515/53/9/093016 ↗
67. Huber · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2013 · 438 · S13910.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.01.022 ↗
68. Aho-Mantila · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2015 · 463 · 54610.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.11.049 ↗
69. Kukushkin · Fus. Eng. Des. · 2011 · 86 · 286510.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.06.009 ↗
70. S. Wiesen et al., EDGE2D-EIRENE coupling, JET-ITC project report, 2006, .
71. Guillemaut · Nucl. Fusion · 2014 · 54 · 09301210.1088/0029-5515/54/9/093012 ↗