Plasma–wall interaction issues in ITER
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In 1998 the four ITER parties decided to investigate a smaller and cheaper (50% cost) machine design with reduced technical objective but without jeopardizing the programmatic objective. Based on various design studies a machine with 6.2 m major radius and aspect ratio 3.1 has been selected. Two main regimes of operation are foreseen namely ELMy H-mode and steady-state operation, the latter in discharges with internal transport barriers (ITB). In ELMy H-mode, an important issue is the maximum tolerable energy for repetitive pulsed energy loads (ELMs) of 0.4 and 0.64 MJ m −2 for CFC and W, respectively, in order to achieve adequate divertor lifetimes (ca. a few 1000 discharges). Based on present predictions there is only a marginal compatibility of the expected ELM energy loads with these thresholds. Reducing the ELM size, by gas puffing, tends to reduce also the energy confinement. The regimes with ITB may pose a problem for the divertor operation due to the expected low plasma edge density and the large power crossing the separatrix (up to 130 MW). Using the present knowledge about plasma–wall interaction (erosion in steady and pulsed loads, re-deposition as well as of tritium co-deposition), the majority of the plasma facing surface has to be clad with Be and W. At present, a small area of CFC at the divertor strike zones is foreseen in the reference design. However, due to the relatively high T co-deposition rate predicted, the use of CFC may not be possible in a D–T machine.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Fusion materials and technologies · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. INTOR, Phase Two A, Part III, IAEA, Vienna, 1988
2. ITER CDA Final Report, IAEA, Vienna, 1991
3. R. Aymar, V. Chuyanov, M. Huguet et al., in: Proceedings of 16th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, vol. 1, Montreal, Canada, 1997, p. 3
4. Y. Seki, M. Kikuchi, T. Ando et al., in: Proceedings of the 13th IAEA Conference on Plasma Physics Controlled Fusion, Washington, DC, IAEA-CN-53/G-1-2, 1990
5. Technical Basis for the ITER Final Design Report, Cost Review and Safety Analysis, (FDR) ITER EDA Documentation Series No. 16, IAEA, Vienna, 1998
6. Federici · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 1410.1016/S0022-3115(98)00876-9 ↗
7. Janeschitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1995 · 220–222 · 7310.1016/0022-3115(94)00447-1 ↗
8. Leonard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 10910.1016/S0022-3115(98)00522-4 ↗
9. Horst Pacher · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 25510.1016/S0022-3115(97)80045-1 ↗
10. G. Federici et al., Issues arising from plasma material interactions in reactor class tokamaks, review paper, Nucl. Fus., to be published
11. Janeschitz · Nucl. Fus. · 2000 · 4 · 119710.1088/0029-5515/40/6/316 ↗
12. ITER Special Working Group report, 1999
13. Söldner · Plasma Phys. Control. Fus. · 1997 · 39 · B35310.1088/0741-3335/39/12B/027 ↗
14. Fujita · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 237710.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2377 ↗
15. R.C. Wolf et al., in: Proceedings of the 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Yokohama, Japan, IAEA-F1-CN-69/EXP1/12, 1998
16. Lazarus · Nucl. Fus. · 1997 · 37 · 710.1088/0029-5515/37/1/I11 ↗
17. Synakowski · Phys. Plasmas · 1997 · 4 · 173610.1063/1.872275 ↗
18. ITER-FEAT Outline Design Report, ITER EDA Documentation Series, IAEA, Vienna, 2000, to be published
19. ITER Physics Basis, Nucl. Fus. 39 (1999) 213710.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301 ↗
20. Saibene · Nucl. Fus. · 1999 · 39 · 113310.1088/0029-5515/39/9/307 ↗
21. J. Stober et al., in: Proceedings of the 26th EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, ECA, 23J, Maastricht, 1999, p. 1401
22. O. Gruber et al., in: Proceedings of the 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Yokohama, Japan, IAEA-F1-CN-69/OV4/3, 1998
23. Y. Kamada et al., in: Proceedings of the 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Yokohama, Japan, IAEA-F1-CN-69/CD2/EX9/2, 1998
24. G. Janeschitz, Yu. Igitkhanov, M. Sugihara et al., in: Proceedings of the 26th the EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion Plasma Physics, Maastricht, 1999, p. 1445
25. Sugihara · Nucl. Fus. · 2000 · 40 · 174310.1088/0029-5515/40/10/306 ↗
26. G. Janeschitz et al., in: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Fusion Technology, Rome, 1999, Fusion Eng. Des., to be published
27. A. Kukushkin et al., in: Proceedings of the 26th the EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion Plasma Physics, Maastricht, 1999, p. 1545
28. A. Kukushkin et al., these Proceedings
29. V. Mukhovatov et al., in: Proceedings of the Seventh IAEA TCM on H-mode and Transport Barrier Physics, Oxford, September 1999
30. M. Kotchenreuter et al., in: Proceedings of the 16th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, IAEA-F1-CN-64/D1-5, Montreal, Canada, 1996
31. M. Sugihara, Y. Igitkhanov, G. Janeschitz et al., in: Proceedings of the 26th the EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion Plasma Physics, Maastricht, 1999, p. 1449
32. J. Stober et al., in: Proceedings of the Seventh IAEA Workshop on H-mode physics and Transport Barriers, Oxford, 1999, to be published in PPCF
33. Leonard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 10910.1016/S0022-3115(98)00522-4 ↗
34. Fishpool · Nucl. Fus. · 1998 · 38 · 137310.1088/0029-5515/38/9/311 ↗
35. A. Leonard et al., these Proceedings
36. G. Federici et al., Assessment of Erosion and co-deposition in ITER-FEAT, these Proceedings
37. Y. Kamada et al., in; Proceedings of the Seventh IAEA TCM on H-mode and Transport Barrier Physics, Oxford, September 1999
38. Ozeki · Nucl. Fus. · 1990 · 30 · 142510.1088/0029-5515/30/8/003 ↗
39. M. Greenwald et al., in: Proceedings of the 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, IAEA-F1-CN-69/EX1/4, Yokohama, 1998
40. V.P. Bahtnagar et al., in: Proceedings of the 18th EPS Conference on Controlled Fusion and Plasma Physics, vol. 1, 1991, p. 369
41. Messian · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 248710.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2487 ↗
42. A. Sakasai et al., in: Proceedings of the 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, IAEA-F1-CN-69/EX6/5, Yokohama, 1998
43. H. Würz et al., these Proceedings
44. V. Barabash et al., in: Proceedings of the 20th Symposium on Fusion Technology, vol. 1, Marseille, France, 7–11 September 1998, pp. 215–218
45. Cardella · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 110510.1016/S0022-3115(00)00151-3 ↗
46. A.R. Rafray et al., in: B. Beaumont, et al.,(Eds.), Proceedings of 20th Symposium on Fusion Technology, vol. 1, Marseille, France, 1998, p. 211
47. G. Pautasso et al., these Proceedings
48. Brooks · Nucl. Technol. Fus. · 1983 · 4 · 3310.13182/FST83-A22772 ↗
49. von Keudell · Nucl. Fusion · 1999 · 37 · 145110.1088/0029-5515/39/10/307 ↗
50. Winter · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 22810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00526-1 ↗
51. R. Behrisch, Surface erosion by electrical arcs, in: D.E. Post, R. Behrisch, (Eds.), Physics of Plasma–Wall Interactions in Controlled Fusion (NATO ASI Series B: Physics) Plenum Press, New York, 1986, p. 49510.1007/978-1-4757-0067-1_12 ↗
52. C. Ibbott et al., in: Proceedings of ISFNT-5, Rome, 1999, Fus. Eng Des., to be published
53. G. Vieider et al., European development of prototypes for ITER high heat flux components, in: Proceedings of ISFNT-5, Rome, 1999, Fus. Eng. Des., to be published
54. P. Chappuis et al., IAEA Technical Meeting on SSO of MFD 1999, Nucl. Fus., to be published
55. Ioki · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 283–287 · 95710.1016/S0022-3115(00)00165-3 ↗