journal article·2003-03

Key ITER plasma edge and plasma–material interaction issues

G. Federici, P. Andrew, P. Barabaschi, J. Brooks, R. Doerner, A. Geier, A. Herrmann, G. Janeschitz, K. Krieger, A. Kukushkin, A. Loarte, R. Neu, G. Saibene, M. Shimada, G. Strohmayer, M. Sugihara

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Some of the remaining crucial plasma edge physics and plasma–material interaction issues of the ITER tokamak are discussed in this paper, using either modelling or projections of experimental results from existing tokamak operation or relevant laboratory simulations. The paper covers the following subject areas at issue in the design of the ITER device: (1) plasma thermal loads during Type I ELMs and disruptions, ensuing erosion effects and prospects for mitigating measures, (2) control of co-deposited tritium inventory when carbon is used even on small areas in the divertor near the strike points, (3) efficiency of edge and core fuelling for expected pedestal densities in ITER, and (4) erosion and impurity transport with a full tungsten divertor. Directions and priorities of future research are proposed to narrow remaining uncertainties in the above areas.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. ITER EDA Agreement and Protocol 2, ITER EDA Documentation Series No. 5, IAEA, Vienna, 1994
2. ITER Technical Basis, ITER EDA Documentation Series No. 24, IAEA, Vienna, 2002
3. V. Mukhovatov et al., Comparison of ITER performance predicted by empirical, semi-empirical and theory-based transport models, 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon, France, 14–19 October 2002
4. A. Kukushkin, 28th EPS Conf. on Contr. Fusion and Plasma Phys., Funchal, 18–22 June 2001, P5105, ECA, vol. 25A (2001) 2113
5. H.D. Pacher et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01374-0
6. Federici · Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 196710.1088/0029-5515/41/12/218 ↗
7. Parker · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(97)80027-X ↗
8. Janeschitz · Nucl. Fusion · 2000 · 40 · 119710.1088/0029-5515/40/6/316 ↗
9. Arkhipov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 39410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00484-0 ↗
10. von Keudell · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 23110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00435-9 ↗
11. Makhankov · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2000 · 49–50 · 27510.1016/S0920-3796(00)00380-X ↗
12. Ibbott · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2001 · 56–57 · 24310.1016/S0920-3796(01)00294-0 ↗
13. Leonard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 10910.1016/S0022-3115(98)00522-4 ↗
14. A. Loarte et al., Proc. 18th Int. Conf. Sorrento, 2000, IAEA, Vienna, 2001, IAEA-CN-77. CD-ROM file ITERP/11(R), and http://www.iaea.org/programmes/ripc/physics/fec2000/html/node245.htm#55022
15. A. Loarte et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01398-3
16. Janeschitz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00623-1 ↗
17. Leonard · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 241–243 · 62810.1016/S0022-3115(96)00577-6 ↗
18. Herrmann · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 1995 · 37 · 1710.1088/0741-3335/37/1/002 ↗
19. A. Herrmann, these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01422-8
20. T. Eich, these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01477-0
21. G. Counsell, IAEA TCM Workshop on Divertor Concepts, Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 44 (2002) 827.10.1088/0741-3335/44/6/314 ↗
22. Antar · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 06500110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.065001 ↗
23. G. Federici, H. Wuerz, G. Janeschitz, R. Tivey, Erosion of plasma facing components in ITER, Fusion Eng. Des., in press10.1016/S0920-3796(02)00298-3 ↗
24. Raffray · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 244 · 8510.1016/S0022-3115(96)00680-0 ↗
25. Federici · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1997 · 244 · 10110.1016/S0022-3115(96)00681-2 ↗
26. G. Federici et al., Selection of Plasma-Facing Materials in Next-Step Fusion Devices, 19th Symposium on Fusion Engineering, SOFE, January 22–25, 2002, Atlantic City, NJ, IEEE02CH37231 (2002) 311.
27. Kukushkin · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 88710.1016/S0022-3115(00)00457-8 ↗
28. Federici · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 26010.1016/S0022-3115(00)00627-9 ↗
29. A. Loarte, these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01398-3
30. G. Federici, A. Loarte, G. Saibene, P. Barabaschi, Estimates of ELM erosion in ITER using a statistical approach, Fusion Sci. Technol., to be submitted.
31. Wuerz · Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2001 · 40 · 19110.13182/FST01-A191 ↗
32. Wuerz · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 113810.1016/S0022-3115(00)00478-5 ↗
33. S. Pestchanyi, H. Wuerz, I. Landman, IAEA-TCM on Divertor Concepts Cadarache Sept 2001, Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 44 (2002) 845.
34. Kamada · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2000 · 42 · A24710.1088/0741-3335/42/5A/329 ↗
35. Stober · Nucl. Fusion · 2001 · 41 · 112310.1088/0029-5515/41/9/301 ↗
36. Saibene · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · 176910.1088/0741-3335/44/9/301 ↗
37. J. Wesley, N. Fujisawa, S. Putvinski, M.N. Rosenbluth, Assessment of disruption and disruption-related physics basis for ITER, in Fusion Engineering 1997 Proc. 17th Symp. San Diego, 1997, Vol. 1, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1998, p. 48310.1109/FUSION.1997.687085 ↗
38. ITER Physics Basis, Nucl. Fusion 39 (1999) 213710.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301 ↗
39. H. Wuerz, S. Pestchanyi, B. Bazylev, F. Kappler, A consistent 2D analysis of the ITER 2D divertor, in: Proc. 20th Symp. Fus. Technol., Marseille, France, Vol. 1, 1998, p. 271
40. Wuerz · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2001 · 56–57 · 34910.1016/S0920-3796(01)00319-2 ↗
41. H. Wuerz et al., Report Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, FZKA 6582, 2001
42. Hassanein · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 273 · 32610.1016/S0022-3115(99)00052-5 ↗
43. P. Andrew et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01586-6
44. Taylor · Phys. Plasmas · 1999 · 6 · 187210.1063/1.873445 ↗
45. Pautasso · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 1185
46. D. Whyte et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01525-8
47. Counsell · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 25510.1016/S0022-3115(00)00626-7 ↗
48. V. Rohde et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01335-1
49. Brooks · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2002 · 60 · 51510.1016/S0920-3796(02)00007-8 ↗
50. Kukushkin · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2002 · 44 · 93110.1088/0741-3335/44/6/321 ↗
51. Federici · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 1410.1016/S0022-3115(98)00876-9 ↗
52. J.N. Brooks et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01405-8
53. D.A. Alman et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01428-9
54. Brooks · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 5810.1016/S0022-3115(98)00822-8 ↗
55. Mech · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1998 · 255 · 15310.1016/S0022-3115(98)00035-X ↗
56. R. Behrisch et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01580-5
57. R. Doerner, private communication
58. Scaffidi-Argentina · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2002 · 307–311 · 141110.1016/S0022-3115(02)00991-1 ↗
59. G. Pacher et al., Proceeding of the EPS Conf. 2001, Madeira Portugal, P2.037
60. M. Sugihara, J. Plasma Fusion Res., in press
61. Polevoi · Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion · 2001 · 43 · 152510.1088/0741-3335/43/11/307 ↗
62. Kuteev · Nucl. Fusion · 1995 · 35 · 43110.1088/0029-5515/35/4/I05 ↗
63. Strauss · Phys. Plasmas · 1998 · 5 · 267610.1063/1.872955 ↗
64. Krieger · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1999 · 266–269 · 20710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00890-3 ↗
65. Stangeby · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1992 · 196–198 · 25810.1016/S0022-3115(06)80042-5 ↗
66. W. Eckstein et al., Sputtering Data IPP 9/82, 199310.1016/j.vacuum.2007.12.004 ↗
67. Asmussen · Nucl. Fusion · 1998 · 38 · 710.1088/0029-5515/38/7/302 ↗
68. V. Philipps et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01344-2
69. A. Kirschner et al, Hydrocarbon transport in the MkIIa divertor of JET, Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, in press10.1088/0741-3335/45/3/311 ↗
70. R. Neu, these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01386-7
71. A. Geier et al., these Proceedings. PII: S0022-3115(02)01519-2