Physics basis and design of the ITER plasma-facing components
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In ITER, as in any tokamak, the first wall and divertor plasma-facing components (PFC) must provide adequate protection of in-vessel structures, sufficient heat exhaust capability and be compatible with the requirements of plasma purity. These functions take on new significance in ITER, which will combine long pulse, high power operation with severe restrictions on permitted core impurity concentrations and which, in addition, will produce transient energy loads on a scale unattainable in today’s devices. The current ITER PFC design has now reached a rather mature stage following the 2007 ITER Design Review. This paper presents the key elements of the design, reviews the physics drivers, essentially thermal load specifications, which have defined the concept and discusses a selection of material and design issues.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Superconducting Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. N. Holtkamp et al., in: 22nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Geneva, Switzerland (Vienna: IAEA) OV/2-1, 2008.
2. Cardella · Fusion Eng. Des. · 2002 · 61–62 · 11110.1016/S0920-3796(02)00223-5 ↗
3. Stangeby · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 96310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.249 ↗
4. R. Mitteau et al., these proceedings.
5. Pitts · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · T138 · 01400110.1088/0031-8949/2009/T138/014001 ↗
6. A. Loarte et al. in: 22nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Geneva, Switzerland (Vienna: IAEA) IT/P6-13, 2008.
7. ITER Physics Expert Group on Divertor, Nucl. Fusion 39 (1999) 2391.10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/304 ↗
8. Stangeby · Nucl. Fusion · 2010 · 50 · 03501310.1088/0029-5515/50/3/035013 ↗
9. Kobayashi · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · 6110.1088/0029-5515/47/2/001 ↗
10. J.P. Gunn, private communication.
11. D.L. Rudakov et al., these proceedings.
12. Gunn · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 48410.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.195 ↗
13. LaBombard · Nucl. Fusion · 2004 · 44 · 104710.1088/0029-5515/44/10/001 ↗
14. Garcia · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · 66710.1088/0029-5515/47/7/017 ↗
15. Kukushkin · Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2001 · 40 · 23310.1002/1521-3986(200006)40:3/4<233::AID-CTPP233>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
16. Kukushkin · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 07500810.1088/0029-5515/49/7/075008 ↗
17. Pitts · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 337–339 · 14610.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.111 ↗
18. S. Carpentier et al., these proceedings.
19. Kotov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 52810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.301 ↗
20. Sugihara · Nucl. Fusion · 2007 · 47 · 33710.1088/0029-5515/47/4/012 ↗
21. Loarte · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2003 · 43 · 154910.1088/0741-3335/45/9/302 ↗
22. Eich · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 363–365 · 98910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.240 ↗
23. T. Eich et al., these proceedings.
24. Jakubowski · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 09501310.1088/0029-5515/49/9/095013 ↗
25. Klimov · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 72110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.197 ↗
26. Fundamenski · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2006 · 48 · 10910.1088/0741-3335/48/1/008 ↗
27. Roth · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.037 ↗
28. H. D. Pacher et al., these proceedings.
29. Langley · Fusion Special Issue · 1984 · 55
30. Dejarnac · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 81810.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.216 ↗
31. R. Dejarnac et al., these proceedings.
32. Mertens · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2009 · 390–391 · 96710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.253 ↗
33. Pitts · Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2005 · 47 · B30310.1088/0741-3335/47/12B/S22 ↗
34. De Temmerman · Nucl. Fusion · 2008 · 48 · 07500810.1088/0029-5515/48/7/075008 ↗
35. Doerner · Nucl. Fusion · 2009 · 49 · 03500210.1088/0029-5515/49/3/035002 ↗
36. J.D. Elder et al., these proceedings.