Research on Infrasound-based Pipeline Leakage Signal Identification Using Random Forest
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To enhance the identification of infrasound leakage signals, particularly improving the detection and recognition rate of persistent small-scale infrasound leakage signals, this study constructs a multi-feature collaborative leakage identification system based on infrasound signals. In the research process, characteristic parameters of leaked infrasound signals—including time-domain, frequency-domain, and waveform parameters—are first extracted. The random forest algorithm is then employed to rank the importance of these features, enabling preliminary screening of optimal features. Subsequently, based on the eigenvalue distribution law of non-leakage signals, the 3σ criterion is utilized to establish an adaptive dynamic threshold range for non-leakage signal features, with secondary feature selection conducted in conjunction with multi-feature collaboration. Finally, a binary classification framework is constructed to achieve leakage discrimination. Experimental results demonstrate that the optimal feature combination for sudden leakage is peak-to-peak value and frequency mean, yielding a discriminant accuracy of 99.5%. For persistent leakage, the optimal feature combination is variance and frequency root mean square, with a discriminant accuracy of 96%. Additionally, leakage aperture exerts a significant influence on model performance: as the leakage aperture increases, the discriminant accuracy exhibits a stepwise upward trend.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Water Systems and Optimization · Electricity Theft Detection Techniques · Flow Measurement and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Lu H, Iseley T, Behbahani S, Fu L.: Leakage detection techniques for oil and gas pipelines: State-of-the-art, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 98 103249 (2020)10.1016/j.tust.2019.103249 ↗
2. Liu, D., Liu, A.B., Chen, F., Zhang, F., Wang, H.H., Wu, J.X.: Error Mechanism Study on Sensitivity Calibration of Microphone in Infrasound Band. Appl. Acoust. 40, 926–936 (2021)
3. Santos-Ruiz, I., Bermúdez, J., López-Estrada, F., Puig, V., Torres, L., Delgado-Aguiñaga, J.: Online leak diagnosis in pipelines using an EKF-based and steady-state mixed approach. Control. Eng. Pract. 81, 55–64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.09.00610.1016/j.conengprac.2018.09.006 ↗
4. Chum, J., Liu, J., Podolská, K., Sindelárová, T.: Infrasound in the ionosphere from earthquakes and typhoons. J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys. 171, 72–82 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.07.02210.1016/j.jastp.2017.07.022 ↗
5. Zagretdinov, A., Ziganshin, S., Izmailova, E., Vankov, Y., Klyukin, I., Alexandrov, R.: Detection of pipeline leaks using fractal analysis of acoustic signals. Fractal and Fractional 8, 17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract804021310.3390/fractalfract8040213 ↗
6. Wang YQ, Wan S, Zhou YC, Yang HG .: Research on Technology of Gas Pipeline Leakage Detection Based on Infrasonic Wave. AMM 401–403:1106–1109 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.401-403.1106.10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.401-403.1106 ↗
7. Wang H, Wang L, Ruan X.: Application of infrasound pipeline leakage detection technology in natural gas transmission pipelines, Urban Gas, 10–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5152.2016.11.003.10.3969/j.issn.1671-5152.2016.11.003 ↗
8. Zhao P.: Research and application of leakage detection method for heating pipelines based on infrasound method, Qingdao University (2023). https://doi.org/10.27262/d.cnki.gqdau.2023.003777.10.27262/d.cnki.gqdau.2023.003777 ↗
9. Mahmutoglu, Y., Turk, K.: A passive acoustic based system to locate leak hole in underwater natural gas pipelines. Digit. Signal Prog. 76, 59–65 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2018.02.00710.1016/j.dsp.2018.02.007 ↗
10. Stoianov I, Nachman L, Madden S, Tokmouline T.: PIPENETa wireless sensor network for pipeline monitoring, Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, Association for Computing Machinery, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp. 264–273 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1236360.1236396.10.1145/1236360.1236396 ↗
11. Lu, J., Fu, Y., Yue, J., Zhu, L., Wang, D., Hu, Z.: Natural gas pipeline leak diagnosis based on improved variational modal decomposition and locally linear embedding feature extraction method. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 164, 857–867 (2022)10.1016/j.psep.2022.05.043 ↗
12. Feng, S., Hiroyuki, O., Hidennori, T., Yuichi, K., Hu, S.: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of gmaw welding fault based on mahalanobis distance. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12, 949–955 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-011-0127-310.1007/s12541-011-0127-3 ↗
13. Yeager, M., Gregory, B., Key, C., Todd, M.: On using robust Mahalanobis distance estimations for feature discrimination in a damage detection scenario. Structural Health Monitoring-an Int J 18, 245–253 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/147592171774887810.1177/1475921717748878 ↗
14. Ververidis, D., Kotropoulos, C.: Information loss of the mahalanobis distance in high dimensions: application to feature selection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31, 2275–2281 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2009.8410.1109/tpami.2009.84 ↗
15. Hu Y.: The Research on Infrasonic Sensor and Its Leak Detection System for Oil and Gas Pipelines. Xi'an Shiyou University (2014)
16. Wang L.: Study on characteristics of infrasound leakage source and signal identification of urban PE pipeline. Changzhou University (2024). https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27739/d.cnki.gjsgy.2024.000028.
17. Wang F, Lin W, Liu Z, Wu S, Qiu X.: Pipeline Leak Detection by Using Time-Domain Statistical Features, IEEE Sens. J. 17 6431–6442 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2017.2740220.10.1109/jsen.2017.2740220 ↗
18. Kousiopoulos, G., Kampelopoulos, D., Karagiorgos, N., Papastavrou, G., Konstantakos, V., Nikolaidis, S.: Acoustic Leak Localization Method for Pipelines in High-Noise Environment Using Time-Frequency Signal Segmentation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 71, 11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2022.315086410.1109/tim.2022.3150864 ↗
19. Han, X., Zhao, S., Cui, X., Yan, Y.: Localization of CO2 gas leakages through acoustic emission multi-sensor fusion based on wavelet-RBFN modeling. Meas. Sci. Technol. 30, 15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab102510.1088/1361-6501/ab1025 ↗
20. Kijima M, Miyagaw Y, Oshita H, Segawa N, Yazawa M, Yamamoto M-y.: Multiple Door Opening/Closing Detection System Using Infrasound Sensor, in: 2018 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), Porto, pp. 126–127 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPSN.2018.00026.10.1109/IPSN.2018.00026 ↗
21. Tan X, Li X, Li H, Zeng X, Liu T, Luo S.: A Deep Learning Approach for Distant Infrasound Signals Classification, Sensors 25 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/s25072058.10.3390/s25072058 ↗
22. Williams R, Perttu A, Taisne B.: Processing of volcano infrasound using film sound audio post-production techniques to improve signal detection via array processing, Geoscience Letters 7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-020-00158-4.10.1186/s40562-020-00158-4 ↗
23. Zhong L.: Research on leakage detection method of tailings pipeline based on infrasound wave and negative pressure wave, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (2023). https://doi.org/10.27176/d.cnki.gnfyc.2023.000335.10.27176/d.cnki.gnfyc.2023.000335 ↗
24. Fares, A., Tijani, I., Rui, Z., Zayed, T.: Leak detection in real water distribution networks based on acoustic emission and machine learning. Environ. Technol. 44, 3850–3866 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2022.207432010.1080/09593330.2022.2074320 ↗
25. Glentis G O, Georgoulaki K, Angelopoulos K.: Efficient selection of time domain features for leakage detection in pipes carrying liquid commodities, in: 2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), IEEE Press, Glasgow, United Kingdom, pp. 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/i2mtc50364.2021.9459811.10.1109/i2mtc50364.2021.9459811 ↗
26. Qin Q, Xiong W, Guo Q, Dong S Multi-fault feature extraction and recognition of vibration signals of coal mine electromechanical equipment. Coal Mine Machinery, 46:201–204 (2025). https://doi.org/10.13436/j.mkjx.20250605110.13436/j.mkjx.202506051 ↗
27. Liu Y.: Acoustic characteristics and the identification of leakage parameters of hydrogen pipeline leakage, Shandong University (2024). https://doi.org/10.27272/d.cnki.gshdu.2024.006323.10.27272/d.cnki.gshdu.2024.006323 ↗
28. Yang J, Wen Y, Li P.: Leak acoustic detection in water distribution pipelines, 2008 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, IEEE, pp. 3057–3061 (2008)10.1109/WCICA.2008.4594487 ↗
29. Tu L, Kim J.: Discriminative feature analysis based on the crossing level for leakage classification in water pipelines, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145 EL611–EL617 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.511380910.1121/1.5113809 ↗
30. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1, 81–106 (1986)10.1023/A:1022643204877 ↗
31. Dai T, Zhu J, Xiao K, Cao M, Han J, Li S.: Bearing feature selection and fault classification based on beluga whale optimization algorithm and random forest. Industrial Control Computer, 38:43–45+48 (2025)
32. Cai, J., Luo, J., Wang, S., Yang, S.: Feature selection in machine learning: A new perspective. Neurocomputing 300, 70–79 (2018)10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.077 ↗
33. Dash, M., Liu, H.: Feature selection for classification. Intelligent data analysis 1, 131–156 (1997)10.3233/IDA-1997-1302 ↗
34. Chandrashekar, G., Sahin, F.: A survey on feature selection methods. Comput. Electr. Eng. 40, 16–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.02410.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 ↗
35. Ning, F., Cheng, Z., Meng, D., Wei, J.: A framework combining acoustic features extraction method and random forest algorithm for gas pipeline leak detection and classification. Appl. Acoust. 182, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.10825510.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108255 ↗