journal article·2026-09Open access

Evaluation of Stereovision Tracking of Targets with Gaussian Pixel Intensity Distribution for Measuring 3D Displacements of Structures

Daniel Alexander Pohoryles, Marco Peroni, Simone Peloso, Francisco Javier Molina

Abstract

This study evaluates a method for tracking targets using stereovision-based structural monitoring for accurately measuring three-dimensional (3D) displacements of structures. The greyscale targets are printed with a Gaussian pixel intensity distribution, which allows to efficiently identify their centres using an optimisation algorithm. Compared to traditional sensors, such as linear transducers, this non-contact technique provides enhanced versatility, especially in situations where the application of contact-based sensors may be challenging and full-field vision-based measurements, such as Digital Image Correlation (DIC), may be impractical. A series of experimental tests on a calibration bench were conducted to evaluate the displacement measurements using the target tracking algorithm in comparison to traditional contact-based monitoring systems and DIC. The evaluation was carried out according to five criteria: resolution, accuracy, repeatability, reversibility, and standard error. Various parameters, including target size, colour schemes, and camera orientations, were analysed. The results obtained in this study demonstrate that tracking of the Gaussian greyscale targets provides precise measurements with low computational cost, achieving accuracies comparable to both contact-based sensors and DIC. It was shown that a minimum target size of 6 pixels is required and that target sizes between 9 and 36 pixels are preferable, as the impact of colour scheme or camera orientation is least significant. Overall, the tracking algorithm shows promise as a viable alternative for structural and mechanical testing, offering advantages in speed, flexibility, and the ability to measure 3D motion, addressing some limitations of existing techniques.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Ma, Z., Choi, J., Sohn, H.: Structural displacement sensing techniques for civil infrastructure: a review. J. Infrastruct. Intell. Resil. 2, 100041 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iintel.2023.10004110.1016/j.iintel.2023.100041 ↗
2. Jones, E., Iadicola, M., Bigger, R., Blaysat, B., Boo, C., Grewer, M., et al.: A Good Practices Guide for Digital Image Correlation, 1st ed International Digital Image Correlation Society (2018). https://doi.org/10.32720/idics/gpg.ed1/print.format10.32720/idics/gpg.ed1/print.format ↗
3. Goidescu, C., Welemane, H., Garnier, C., Fazzini, M., Brault, R., Péronnet, E., et al.: Damage investigation in CFRP composites using full-field measurement techniques: combination of digital image stereo-correlation, infrared thermography and X-ray tomography. Compos. Part B Eng. 48, 95–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.11.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2012.11.016 ↗
4. Deng, H.-X., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Liang, C.-J., Ma, M.-C., Zhong, X., et al.: A stereovision measurement for large deformation of light structures. Measurement 136, 387–394 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.06210.1016/j.measurement.2018.12.062 ↗
5. Shan, B., Ren, N., Xue, Z.: Stereovision-based surface deformation detection of offshore wind turbine model under ship impact. Measurement 131, 605–614 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.07510.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.075 ↗
6. Pohoryles, D.A., Melo, J., Rossetto, T., Fabian, M., McCague, C., Stavrianaki, K., et al.: Use of DIC and AE for monitoring effective strain and debonding in FRP and FRCM-retrofitted RC beams. J. Compos. Constr. 21, 04016057 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000071510.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000715 ↗
7. Ahn SJ, Rauh W. Circular Coded Target and Its Application to Optical 3D-Measurement Techniques. In: Levi P, Schanz M, Ahlers R-J, May F, editors. Mustererkenn. 1998, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1998, p. 245–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72282-0_26.10.1007/978-3-642-72282-0_26 ↗
8. Liu, Y., Su, X., Guo, X., Suo, T., Yu, Q.: A novel concentric circular coded target, and its positioning and identifying method for vision measurement under challenging conditions. Sensors 21, 855 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2103085510.3390/s21030855 ↗
9. Bergamasco F, Cosmo L, Albarelli A, Torsello A. Camera Calibration from Coplanar Circles. 2014 22nd Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit., Stockholm, Sweden: IEEE; 2014, p. 2137–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2014.372.10.1109/ICPR.2014.372 ↗
10. Shan, B., Yuan, W., Xue, Z.: A calibration method for stereovision system based on solid circle target. Measurement 132, 213–223 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.04810.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.048 ↗
11. Yang, L., Zhou, F., Zhang, W., Liu, Y.: A novel camera calibration method based on circle projection model. Measurement 222, 113651 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11365110.1016/j.measurement.2023.113651 ↗
12. Otepka JO, Fraser CS. Accuracy enhancement of vision metrology through automatic target plane determination. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. XXXV part B5, Istanbul, Turkey: 2004, p. 873–9.
13. Shortis MR, Clarke TA, Short T. Comparison of some techniques for the subpixel location of discrete target images. Videometrics III, vol. 2350, SPIE; 1994, p. 239–50. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.189136.10.1117/12.189136 ↗
14. Mazzoleni, P., Matta, F., Zappa, E., Sutton, M.A., Cigada, A.: Gaussian pre-filtering for uncertainty minimization in digital image correlation using numerically-designed speckle patterns. Opt. Lasers Eng. 66, 19–33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.08.00410.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.08.004 ↗
15. Su, Y., Zhang, Q., Gao, Z.: Statistical model for speckle pattern optimization. Opt. Express 25, 30259–30275 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.03025910.1364/OE.25.030259 ↗
16. Su, Y., Zhang, Q.: Glare: a free and open-source software for generation and assessment of digital speckle pattern. Opt. Lasers Eng. 148, 106766 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.10676610.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106766 ↗
17. Caperan P. A new tracking algorithm with application to a practical measurement case. Proc. 8th Conf. Opt. 3- Meas. Tech., Zurich (Switzerland): ETH Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule Zurich; 2007.
18. Capéran, P., Poljanšek, M., Gutiérrez, E., Primi, S., Paulotto, C.: Optical 3-dimensional measurements on a FRP beam tested at serviceability limit. Compos. Struct. 94, 3465–3477 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.022 ↗
19. Peroni, M., Solomos, G., Caverzan, A., Larcher, M., Valsamos, G.: Assessment of dynamic mechanical behaviour of reinforced concrete beams using a blast simulator. EPJ Web Conf 94, 01010 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/2015940101010.1051/epjconf/20159401010 ↗
20. Peroni, M., Solomos, G., Babcsan, N.: Development of a Hopkinson Bar Apparatus for testing soft materials: application to a closed-cell aluminum foam. Materials 9, 27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma901002710.3390/ma9010027 ↗
21. MatchID: MatchID Manual. MatchID: Metrology Beyond Colors, Gent, Belgium (2018)
22. Peloso, S., Molina, F.J., Lamperti Tornaghi, M., Munaretto, G., Pereira, B., Peroni, M., et al.: ELSA, Procedure for Calibration and Verification of Displacement and Rotation Measuring Systems. Publications Office, LU (2024)
23. Heidenhain. MSA373–0 P - Measuring system. Heidenhain n.d. https://www.heidenhain.com (accessed September 16, 2025).
24. Gefran. PZ-12-A-025 - Linear Position Transducer with Cylindrical Case. Gefran n.d. https://www.gefran.com (accessed September 16, 2025).
25. Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co KG. EL 3255 - EtherCAT Terminal, 5-channel analog input, potentiometer, 300 Ω…50 kΩ, 16 bit. Beckhoff Autom n.d. https://www.beckhoff.com (accessed September 16, 2025).
26. Peroni, M., Pegon, P., Molina, F.J., Buchet, P.: Ethernet-based servo-hydraulic real-time controller and DAQ at ELSA for large scale experiments. J. Earthq. Eng. 26, 7657–7688 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.197913410.1080/13632469.2021.1979134 ↗
27. Bouguet J-Y. “Camera calibration toolbox for MATLAB”, Computational Vision at the California Institute of Technology 2012.
28. Zhang, Z.: A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22, 1330–1334 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/34.88871810.1109/34.888718 ↗
29. Heikkila J, Silven O. A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction. Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 1997, p. 1106–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.1997.609468.10.1109/CVPR.1997.609468 ↗