Magnetic-Resonance Eddy-Current Test Enhanced by a Bidirectional GRU Network for Simultaneous Prediction of Rebar Diameter and Embedment Depth in Concrete
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, Y.C., Yi, T.H., Lin, S., et al.: Automatic corrosive environment detection of RC bridge decks from ground-penetrating radar data based on deep learning. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 36(2), 04022011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000171210.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001712 ↗
2. Zhang, H., Liao, L., Zhao, R., et al.: The non-destructive test of steel corrosion in reinforced concrete bridges using a micro-magnetic sensor. Sensors 16(9), 1439 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1609143910.3390/s16091439 ↗
3. Farag, E.H., Toyserkani, E., Khamesee, M.B.: Non-destructive testing using eddy current sensors for defect detection in additively manufactured titanium and stainless-steel parts. Sensors 22(14), 5440 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2214544010.3390/s22145440 ↗
4. Kot, P., Muradov, M., Gkantou, M., et al.: Recent advancements in non-destructive testing techniques for structural health monitoring. Applied Sciences 11(6), 2750 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1106275010.3390/app11062750 ↗
5. Wu X, Yang F, Qiao X, et al.: Rebar detection in concrete based on GPR B-scan[C]//2022 8th International Conference on Hydraulic and Civil Engineering: Deep Space Intelligent Development and Utilization Forum (ICHCE). IEEE. 172–180 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHCE57331.2022.1004269610.1109/ICHCE57331.2022.10042696 ↗
6. Liu, H., Lin, C., Cui, J., et al.: Detection and localization of rebar in concrete by deep learning using ground penetrating radar. Autom. Constr. 118, 103279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10327910.1016/j.autcon.2020.103279 ↗
7. Luo, S., Elouarzaki, K., Xu, Z.J.: Electrochemistry in magnetic fields. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 61(27), e202203564 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20220356410.1002/anie.202203564 ↗
8. Zhou, Y., Mahmood, S., Engelberg, D.L.: A novel high throughput electrochemistry corrosion test method: bipolar electrochemistry. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry 39, 101263 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2023.10126310.1016/j.coelec.2023.101263 ↗
9. Bektaş, Ö., Kurban, Y.C., Özboylan, B.: Development of magnetic flux leakage device as a non-destructive method for structural reinforcement detection. Materiales de Construcción 72(345), e273–e273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2022.0242110.3989/mc.2022.02421 ↗
10. Frankowski, P.K., Majzner, P., Mąka, M., et al.: Non-destructive evaluation of reinforced concrete structures with magnetic flux leakage and eddy current methods—comparative analysis. Applied Sciences (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14241196510.3390/app142411965 ↗
11. Chun, P., Ujike, I., Mishima, K., et al.: Random forest-based evaluation technique for internal damage in reinforced concrete featuring multiple nondestructive testing results. Construction and Building Materials 253, 119238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11923810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119238 ↗
12. Zhang, S., Jia, Z., Xiong, Y., et al.: Wave amplitude of embedded ultrasonic transducer-based damage monitoring of concrete due to steel bar corrosion. Struct. Health Monit. 21(4), 1694–1709 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921721104170610.1177/14759217211041706 ↗
13. Lim, M.K., Cao, H.: Combining multiple NDT methods to improve testing effectiveness. Construction and Building Materials 38, 1310–1315 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.011 ↗
14. She, S., Xia, Z., Zheng, X., et al.: Simultaneous measurements of metal plate thickness and defect depth using low frequency sweeping eddy current testing. Measurement 233, 114687 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11468710.1016/j.measurement.2024.114687 ↗
15. Vasić, D., Bilas, V.: Instrumentation and measurement systems: ecosystems—insights from NDT and eddy current testing. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 27(1), 10–17 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2024.1042365410.1109/MIM.2024.10423654 ↗
16. Zhang, J., Liao, L., Lan, T., et al.: Magnetic resonance eddy current testing imaging and non-destructive evaluation of rebar in concrete[J]. Measurement. 118931 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.11893110.1016/j.measurement.2025.118931 ↗
17. Liao, Z.J., Yi, J., Chen, Z., et al.: Electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) like control method for magnetic coupling wireless power transfer systems: Z.-J. Liao et al[J]. J. Power Electron. 25(7):1357–1373 (2025). https://rdcu.be/eV8bq10.1007/s43236-024-00968-1 ↗
18. Wang, S., Gan, F., Gou, H., et al.: An online monitoring method for high-temperature environments combining eddy current testing and electromagnetic acoustic transducer techniques. IEEE Sens. J. 24(6), 8682–8693 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.335568910.1109/JSEN.2024.3355689 ↗
19. Deng, F., Cao, Q., Han, X., et al.: Principle and realization of an electromagnetic pulse welding system with a dual-stage coil. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 57(4), 389–398 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-18000610.3233/JAE-180006 ↗
20. Munjal, R., Arif, S., Wendler, F., et al.: Comparative study of machine-learning frameworks for the elaboration of feed-forward neural networks by varying the complexity of impedimetric datasets synthesized using eddy current sensors for the characterization of bi-metallic coins. Sensors 22(4), 1312 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2204131210.3390/s22041312 ↗
21. Park, S., Kim, J., Jeon, K.: Improvement of gpr-based rebar diameter estimation using yolo-v3. Remote Sens. 13(10), 2011 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1310201110.3390/rs13102011 ↗
22. Li, X., Liu, H., Zhou, F., et al.: Deep learning–based nondestructive evaluation of reinforcement bars using ground‐penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction data. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 37(14), 1834–1853 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.1279810.1111/mice.12798 ↗
23. Mi, J.X., Li, A.D., Zhou, L.F.: Review study of interpretation methods for future interpretable machine learning. IEEE Access 8, 191969–191985 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.303275610.1109/ACCESS.2020.3032756 ↗
24. Giannakis, I., Giannopoulos, A., Warren, C.: A machine learning scheme for estimating the diameter of reinforcing bars using ground penetrating radar. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 18(3), 461–465 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.297750510.1109/LGRS.2020.2977505 ↗
25. Koido, J., Hoshikawa, H.: Covering thickness and diameter measurement of reinforcing bars by eddy current testing using neural network. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation: Volume 14, pp. 841–847. Springer US, Boston, MA (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1987-4_10510.1007/978-1-4615-1987-4_105 ↗
26. Borup, D., Christensen, B.J., Mühlbach, N.S., et al.: Targeting predictors in random forest regression. International Journal of Forecasting 39(2), 841–868 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.02.01010.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.02.010 ↗
27. Kim, M.K., Thedja, J.P.P., Wang, Q.: Automated dimensional quality assessment for formwork and rebar of reinforced concrete components using 3D point cloud data. Autom. Constr. 112, 103077 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10307710.1016/j.autcon.2020.103077 ↗
28. Kim, M.K., Thedja, J.P.P., Chi, H.L., et al.: Automated rebar diameter classification using point cloud data based machine learning. Automation in Construction 122, 103476 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10347610.1016/j.autcon.2020.103476 ↗
29. Cha, Y.J., Choi, W., Büyüköztürk, O.: Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 32(5), 361–378 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.1226310.1111/mice.12263 ↗
30. Nguyen, T.T., Ta, Q.B., Ho, D.D., et al.: A method for automated bolt-loosening monitoring and assessment using impedance technique and deep learning. Dev. Built Environ. 14, 100122 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2023.10012210.1016/j.dibe.2023.100122 ↗
31. Fu, X., Zhang, C., Peng, X., et al.: Towards end-to-end pulsed eddy current classification and regression with CNN[C]//2019 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC). IEEE. 1–5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2019.882685810.1109/I2MTC.2019.8826858 ↗
32. Ta, Q.B., Pham, Q.Q., Pham, N.L., et al.: Smart aggregate-based concrete stress monitoring via 1D CNN deep learning of raw impedance signals. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2024(1), 5822653 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/582265310.1155/2024/5822653 ↗
33. Ta, Q.B., Pham, N.L., Kim, J.T.: Integrated estimation of stress and damage in concrete structure using 2D convolutional neural network model learned impedance responses of capsule-like smart aggregate sensor. Sensors 24(20), 6652 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2420665210.3390/s24206652 ↗
34. Hou, J., Dong, D., Xiao, L., et al.: An introduction to the design provisions for rebar selection in the current concrete structure design code in China[J]. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. (Trans. Mater. Sci. Eng.) 45(S1), 26–35 (2012)