Incorporating A-priori Knowledge into Convolutional Neural Networks for Impact Echo Frequency Estimation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Manual evaluation and interpretation of Impact echo (IE) data is often labor-intensive and time-consuming, motivating the growing interest in applying machine learning (ML) techniques to this non-destructive testing (NDT) method. However, the scarcity of labeled datasets limits the generalizability of ML models to new, unseen data. This study investigates strategies to integrate a-priori knowledge into Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for improved prediction of the S1 Lamb wave frequency from IE signals. To this end, time–frequency representations of IE signals, derived using the Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT), are used as model inputs. A-priori knowledge is introduced in the form of initial frequency estimates obtained through manual evaluation. Additionally, transfer learning is employed to enrich the limited measurement dataset with data from 2D numerical simulations. The results demonstrate that, although training loss curves remain similar across models, incorporating additional information significantly enhances performance on unseen datasets. Furthermore, pre-training with simulation data accelerates convergence during early fine-tuning stages. The highest predictive accuracy was achieved when the initial guess was directly embedded into the loss function.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Underwater Acoustics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Carino, N.J.: The impact-echo method: An overview. Structures 2001: A Structural Engineering Odyssey, 1–18 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1061/40558(2001)1510.1061/40558(2001)15 ↗
2. Ghomi, M.T., Mahmoudi, J., Darabi, M.: Concrete plate thickness measurement using the indirect impact-echo method. Nondestruct. Testing Eval. 28(2), 119–144 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2012.71132910.1080/10589759.2012.711329 ↗
3. Schoefs, F., Abraham, O., Popovics, J.S.: Quantitative evaluation of contactless impact echo for non-destructive assessment of void detection within tendon ducts. Constr. Build. Mater. 37, 885–892 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.002 ↗
4. Cao, R., Ma, M., Liang, R., Niu, C.: Detecting the void behind the tunnel lining by impact-echo methods with different signal analysis approaches. Appl. Sci. 9(16), 3280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app916328010.3390/app9163280 ↗
5. Algernon, D., Feistkorn, S., Schiegg, Y., Mühlan, B.: Zerstörungsfreie detektion von kiesnestern in stahlbetonbauteilen. Technical report, Eidgenössisches Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation UVEK (2021)
6. Grosse, C., Reinhardt, H., Krüger, M., Beutel, R.: Application of impact-echo techniques for crack detection and crack parameter estimation in concrete. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fracture (ICF11), Turin, Italy, pp. 20–25 (2005)
7. Sansalone, M., Carino, N.J.: Impact-echo method. Concr. Int. 10(4), 38–46 (1988)
8. Gibson, A., Popovics, J.S.: Lamb wave basis for impact-echo method analysis. J. Eng. Mech. 131(4), 438–443 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:4(438)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:4(438) ↗
9. Zhu, J., Popovics, J.: Non-contact detection of surface waves in concrete using an air-coupled sensor. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 615, pp. 1261–1268. American Institute of Physics (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.147294010.1063/1.1472940 ↗
10. Zhu, J., Popovics, J.S.: Imaging concrete structures using air-coupled impact-echo. J. Eng. Mech. 133(6), 628–640 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:6(628)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:6(628) ↗
11. Kee, S.-H., Zhu, J.: Using air-coupled sensors to determine the depth of a surface-breaking crack in concrete. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127(3), 1279–1287 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.329843110.1121/1.3298431 ↗
12. Epp, T., Cha, Y.-J.: Air-coupled impact-echo damage detection in reinforced concrete using wavelet transforms. Smart Mater. Struct. 26(2), 025018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/26/2/02501810.1088/1361-665X/26/2/025018 ↗
13. Epp, T., Svecova, D., Cha, Y.-J.: Automated air-coupled impact echo based non-destructive testing using machine learning. In: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2018, vol. 10598, pp. 401–407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2295947. SPIE10.1117/12.2295947 ↗
14. Song, K.-I., Cho, G.-C.: Numerical study on the evaluation of tunnel shotcrete using the impact-echo method coupled with Fourier transform and short-time Fourier transform. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 47(8), 1274–1288 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.09.00510.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.09.005 ↗
15. Yeh, P.-L., Liu, P.-L.: Application of the wavelet transform and the enhanced Fourier spectrum in the impact echo test. NDT E Int. 41(5), 382–394 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.01.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2008.01.002 ↗
16. Qu, H., Li, T., Chen, G.: Synchro-squeezed adaptive wavelet transform and its application to impact echo signals for pavement defect detection. In: Processdings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure (2019)
17. Algernon, D., Wiggenhauser, H.: Impact echo data analysis based on Hilbert-Huang transform. Transp. Res. Rec. 2028(1), 146–153 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3141/2028-1610.3141/2028-16 ↗
18. Schubert, F., Lausch, R., Wiggenhauser, H.: Geometrical effects on impact-echo testing of finite concrete specimens. In: Proceedings of International Symposium Non-destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE), pp. 16–19 (2003)
19. Algernon, D., Wiggenhauser, H., Schubert, F.: A new approach for the investigation of geometry effects in impact-echo measurements-experimental results and numerical simulations. In: 9th European Conference on NDT, pp. 1–10. European Federation for Non-Destructive Testing (2006)
20. Sansalone, M.J., Streett, W.B.: Impact-echo. Nondestructive Evaluation of Concrete and Masonry. Bullbrier Press (1997)
21. Wang, J.-J., Chang, T.-P., Chen, B.-T., Wang, H.: Determination of Poisson’s ratio of solid circular rods by impact-echo method. J. Sound Vib. 331(5), 1059–1067 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2011.10.03010.1016/j.jsv.2011.10.030 ↗
22. Dethof, F., Keßler, S.: Explaining impact echo geometry effects using modal analysis theory and numerical simulations. NDT E Int. 143, 103035 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10303510.1016/j.ndteint.2023.103035 ↗
23. Dethof, F., Keßler, S.: Design of concrete mock-ups with complex defect scenarios using numerical simulations. J. Nondestr. Eval. 43(2), 1–12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-024-01074-910.1007/s10921-024-01074-9 ↗
24. Liebert, A., Dethof, F., Keßler, S., Niggemann, O.: Automated impact echo spectrum anomaly detection using u-net autoencoder. In: ECAI 2024, pp. 4634–4641. IOS Press (2024). https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA24105810.3233/FAIA241058 ↗
25. Dethof, F., Keßler, S.: Geometry effects in impact echo signals–why traditional time-frequency filtering fails to remove them. In: Proceedings of the 20th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (2024). https://doi.org/10.58286/2991410.58286/29914 ↗
26. Dethof, F., Keßler, S.: Automated honeycomb detection during impact echo inspections in concrete using ai trained by simulation data. In: Proceeding of the 13th European Conference on Non-Destrcutive Testing (2023). https://doi.org/10.58286/2814910.58286/28149 ↗
27. Dorafshan, S., Azari, H.: Deep learning models for bridge deck evaluation using impact echo. Constr. Build. Mater. 263, 120109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12010910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120109 ↗
28. Sengupta, A., Ilgin Guler, S., Shokouhi, P.: Interpreting impact echo data to predict condition rating of concrete bridge decks: A machine-learning approach. J. Bridg. Eng. 26(8), 04021044 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000174410.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001744 ↗
29. Algernon, D., Münch, I., Muller, A., Thurnherr, C.: Machine learning applications in nondestructive testing of concrete structures. CE/papers 6(5), 239–250 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.205310.1002/cepa.2053 ↗
30. Weiss, K., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Wang, D.: A survey of transfer learning. J. Big Data 3, 1–40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-016-0043-610.1186/s40537-016-0043-6 ↗
31. Fellinger, P., Marklein, R., Langenberg, K.J., Klaholz, S.: Numerical modeling of elastic wave propagation and scattering with EFIT–elastodynamic finite integration technique. Wave Motion 21(1), 47–66 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2125(94)00040-C10.1016/0165-2125(94)00040-C ↗
32. Schubert, F., Köhler, B.: Ten lectures on impact-echo. J. Nondestr. Eval. 27, 5–21 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-008-0036-210.1007/s10921-008-0036-2 ↗
33. Dethof, F., Algernon, D., Thurnherr, C., Keßler, S.: Factors influencing impact echo simulations in thick concrete structures. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 22(10), 636–649 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.22.63610.3151/jact.22.636 ↗
34. Aßmann, N., Bühling, B.: Impact-echo dataset” radarplatte”. Technical report, Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) (2021). https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UNOH2U10.7910/DVN/UNOH2U ↗
35. Hiltunen, D.R., Algernon, D., Ferraro, C.C., et al.: Validation of nondestructive testing equipment for concrete. Technical report, University of Florida (2010)
36. 1383, A.C.: Test Method for Measuring the P-Wave Speed and the Thickness of Concrete Plates using the Impact-Echo Method (2010)
37. Dethof, F., Doll, F., Heldt, K.-P., Kindel, E., Kucz, M., Stublla, H., Keßler, S.: Improvements in impact echo data quality through time signal stacking. In: DGZfP-Jahrestagung 2025 (2025). https://doi.org/10.58286/3123410.58286/31234 ↗
38. Rost, S., Thomas, C.: Array seismology: Methods and applications. Rev. Geophys. 40(3), 2–1 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RG00010010.1029/2000RG000100 ↗
39. Niederleithinger, E.: Seismic methods applied to ultrasonic testing in civil engineering. Technical report, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen (2017)
40. Carino, N.J.: Impact echo: The fundamentals. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE), Berlin, Germany, pp. 15–17 (2015)
41. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 25 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1145/306538610.1145/3065386 ↗
42. Besler, E., Wang, Y.C., Sahakian, A.V.: Early and late fusion machine learning on multi-frequency electrical impedance data to improve radiofrequency ablation monitoring. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 24, 2359–2367 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2019.295292210.1109/JBHI.2019.2952922 ↗
43. Niederleithinger, E., Gardner, S., Kind, T., Kaiser, R., Grunwald, M., Yang, G., Redmer, B., Waske, A., Mielentz, F., Effner, U., et al.: Muon tomography of the interior of a reinforced concrete block: First experimental proof of concept. J. Nondestr. Eval. 40, 1–14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00797-310.1007/s10921-021-00797-3 ↗