journal article·2025-12Open access

Plug-and-Play with 2.5D Artifact Reduction Prior for Fast and Accurate Industrial Computed Tomography Reconstruction

Haley Duba-Sullivan, Aniket Pramanik, Venkatakrishnan Singanallur, Amirkoushyar Ziabari

Abstract

Cone-beam X-ray computed tomography (XCT) is an essential imaging technique for generating 3D reconstructions of internal structures, with applications ranging from medical to industrial imaging. Producing high-quality reconstructions typically requires many X-ray measurements; this process can be slow and expensive, especially for dense materials. Recent work incorporating artifact reduction priors within a plug-and-play (PnP) reconstruction framework has shown promising results in improving image quality from sparse-view XCT scans while enhancing the generalizability of deep learning-based solutions. However, this method uses a 2D convolutional neural network (CNN) for artifact reduction, which captures only slice-independent information from the 3D reconstruction, limiting performance. In this paper, we propose a PnP reconstruction method that uses a 2.5D artifact reduction CNN as the prior. This approach leverages inter-slice information from adjacent slices, capturing richer spatial context while remaining computationally efficient. We show that this 2.5D prior not only improves the quality of reconstructions but also enables the model to directly suppress commonly occurring XCT artifacts (such as beam hardening), eliminating the need for artifact correction pre-processing. Experiments on both experimental and synthetic cone-beam XCT data demonstrate that the proposed method better preserves fine structural details, such as pore size and shape, leading to more accurate defect detection compared to 2D priors. In particular, we demonstrate strong performance on experimental XCT data using a 2.5D artifact reduction prior trained entirely on simulated scans, highlighting the proposed method’s ability to generalize across domains.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Radiation Dose and Imaging

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Azhari, E.-E.M., Hatta, M.M.M., Htike, Z.Z., Win, S.L.: Tumor detection in medical imaging: a survey. Int. J. Adv. Inf. Technol. 4(1), 21 (2014)
2. Zanini, F., Carmignato, S., Savio, E., et al.: Assembly analysis of titanium dental implants using X-ray computed tomography. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the European Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, pp. 489–490 (2017). euspen
3. Rupal, B.S., Anwer, N., Secanell, M., Qureshi, A.J.: Geometric tolerance and manufacturing assemblability estimation of metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes. Mater. Des. 194, 108842 (2020)10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108842 ↗
4. Khosravani, M.R., Reinicke, T.: On the use of x-ray computed tomography in assessment of 3d-printed components. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 39, 1–17 (2020)10.1007/s10921-020-00721-1 ↗
5. Naresh, K., Khan, K., Umer, R., Cantwell, W.J.: The use of x-ray computed tomography for design and process modeling of aerospace composites: A review. Mater. Des. 190, 108553 (2020)10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108553 ↗
6. Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, K., Yavuz, M.C., Chen, X., Yuan, Y., Li, H., Yang, Y., Yuille, A., Tang, Y., et al.: Universal and extensible language-vision models for organ segmentation and tumor detection from abdominal computed tomography. Med. Image Anal. 97, 103226 (2024)10.1016/j.media.2024.103226 ↗
7. Feldkamp, L.A., Davis, L.C., Kress, J.W.: Practical cone-beam algorithm. JOSA A 1(6), 612–619 (1984)10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612 ↗
8. Bouman, C., Sauer, K.: A generalized gaussian image model for edge-preserving map estimation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2(3), 296–310 (1993)10.1109/83.236536 ↗
9. Sauer, K., Bouman, C.: Bayesian estimation of transmission tomograms using segmentation based optimization. IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci. 39(4), 1144–1152 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1109/23.15977410.1109/23.159774 ↗
10. Thibault, J.-B., Sauer, K.D., Bouman, C.A., Hsieh, J.: A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med. Phys. 34(11), 4526–4544 (2007)10.1118/1.2789499 ↗
11. Yu, Z., Thibault, J.-B., Bouman, C.A., Sauer, K.D., Hsieh, J.: Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogeneous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(1), 161–175 (2010)10.1109/TIP.2010.2058811 ↗
12. Mohan, K.A., Ziabari, A.K., Bouman, C.A.: Algorithm-driven advances for scientific ct instruments: From model-based to deep learning-based approaches. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 39(1), 32–43 (2021)
13. Venkatakrishnan, S.V., Bouman, C.A., Wohlberg, B.: Plug-and-play priors for model based reconstruction. In: 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing, pp. 945–948 (2013). IEEE10.1109/GlobalSIP.2013.6737048 ↗
14. Chan, S.H., Wang, X., Elgendy, O.A.: Plug-and-play ADMM for image restoration: Fixed-point convergence and applications. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 3(1), 84–98 (2016)10.1109/TCI.2016.2629286 ↗
15. He, J., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Zeng, D., Bian, Z., Zhang, H., Sun, J., Xu, Z., Ma, J.: Optimizing a parameterized plug-and-play admm for iterative low-dose ct reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38(2), 371–382 (2018)10.1109/TMI.2018.2865202 ↗
16. Kamilov, U.S., Bouman, C.A., Buzzard, G.T., Wohlberg, B.: Plug-and-play methods for integrating physical and learned models in computational imaging: Theory, algorithms, and applications. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 40(1), 85–97 (2023)10.1109/MSP.2022.3199595 ↗
17. Vo, R., Escoda, J., Vienne, C., Decencière, E.: Plug-and-play learned proximal trajectory for 3d sparse-view x-ray computed tomography. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 221–238 (2024). Springer10.1007/978-3-031-72761-0_13 ↗
18. Hammernik, K., Würfl, T., Pock, T., Maier, A.: A deep learning architecture for limited-angle computed tomography reconstruction. In: Bildverarbeitung Für die Medizin 2017: Algorithmen-Systeme-Anwendungen. Proceedings des Workshops Vom 12. Bis 14. März 2017 in Heidelberg, pp. 92–97 (2017). Springer10.1007/978-3-662-54345-0_25 ↗
19. Park, H.S., Lee, S.M., Kim, H.P., Seo, J.K., Chung, Y.E.: Ct sinogram-consistency learning for metal-induced beam hardening correction. Med. Phys. 45(12), 5376–5384 (2018)10.1002/mp.13199 ↗
20. Xu, S., Dang, H.: Deep residual learning enabled metal artifact reduction in ct. In: Medical Imaging 2018: Physics of Medical Imaging, vol. 10573, pp. 950–955 (2018). SPIE10.1117/12.2293945 ↗
21. Ghani, M.U., Karl, W.C.: Fast enhanced ct metal artifact reduction using data domain deep learning. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 6, 181–193 (2019)10.1109/TCI.2019.2937221 ↗
22. Ziabari, A., Snow, Z., Lisovich, A., Sprayberry, M., Brackman, P., Frederick, C., Bhattad, P., Graham, S., Bingham, P., et al.: Enabling rapid X-ray CT characterisation for additive manufacturing using CAD models and deep learning-based reconstruction. NPJ Comput. Mater. 9(1), 91 (2023)10.1038/s41524-023-01032-5 ↗
23. Pramanik, A., Rahman, O., Venkatakrishnan, S.V., Ziabari, A.: A fast, scalable, and robust deep learning-based iterative reconstruction framework for accelerated industrial cone-beam x-ray computed tomography. arXiv:2501.13961. (2025)
24. Duba-Sullivan, H., Rahman, O., Venkatakrishnan, S., Ziabari, A.: 2.5d super-resolution approaches for x-ray computed tomography-based inspection of additively manufactured parts. In: 2024 58th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, pp. 304–313. IEEE (2024)10.1109/IEEECONF60004.2024.10942638 ↗
25. Shi, J., Elkilany, O., Fischer, A., Suppes, A., Pelt, D.M., Batenburg, K.J.: LoDoInd: Introducing a benchmark low-dose industrial CT dataset and enhancing denoising with 2.5D deep learning techniques. In: 13th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography (2024)
26. Zhang, Y., Liao, Q., Ding, L., Zhang, J.: Bridging 2D and 3D segmentation networks for computation-efficient volumetric medical image segmentation: An empirical study of 2.5D solutions. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 99, 102088 (2022)10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102088 ↗
27. Majee, S., Balke, T., Kemp, C.A., Buzzard, G.T., Bouman, C.A.: Multi-slice fusion for sparse-view and limited-angle 4D CT reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 7, 448–462 (2021)10.1109/TCI.2021.3074881 ↗
28. Luo, J., Eri, H., Can, A., Ramani, S., Fu, L., De Man, B.: 2.5d dictionary learning based computed tomography reconstruction. In: Anomaly Detection and Imaging with X-Rays (ADIX), vol. 9847, pp. 109–120 (2016). SPIE10.1117/12.2223786 ↗
29. Ziabari, A., Ye, D.H., Srivastava, S., Sauer, K.D., Thibault, J.-B., Bouman, C.A.: 2.5D deep learning for CT image reconstruction using a multi-gpu implementation. In: 2018 52nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, pp. 2044–2049 (2018). IEEE10.1109/ACSSC.2018.8645364 ↗
30. Rahman, O., Nagare, M., Sauer, K.D., Bouman, C.A., Melnyk, R., Nett, B., Tang, J.: Mbir training for a 2.5D DL network in X-ray CT. arXiv:2309.13399. (2023)
31. Ziabari, A., Venkatakrishnan, S., Dubey, A., Lisovich, A., Brackman, P., Frederick, C., Bhattad, P., Bingham, P., Plotkowski, A., Dehoff, R., et al.: Simurgh: A framework for cad-driven deep learning based X-Ray CT reconstruction. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 3836–3867 (2022). IEEE10.1109/ICIP46576.2022.9898017 ↗
32. Angermann, C., Haltmeier, M., Steiger, R., Pereverzyev, S., Gizewski, E.: Projection-based 2.5 d u-net architecture for fast volumetric segmentation. In: 2019 13th International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA), pp. 1–5 (2019). IEEE10.1109/SampTA45681.2019.9030861 ↗
33. Zhang, Y., Liao, Q., Ding, L., Zhang, J.: Bridging 2d and 3d segmentation networks for computation-efficient volumetric medical image segmentation: An empirical study of 2.5 d solutions. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 99, 102088 (2022)10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102088 ↗
34. Buzzard, G.T., Chan, S.H., Sreehari, S., Bouman, C.A.: Plug-and-play unplugged: Optimization-free reconstruction using consensus equilibrium. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 11(3), 2001–2020 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1137/17M112245110.1137/17M1122451 ↗
35. Nair, P., Gavaskar, R.G., Chaudhury, K.N.: Fixed-point and objective convergence of plug-and-play algorithms. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 7, 337–348 (2021)10.1109/TCI.2021.3066053 ↗
36. Liu, J., Sun, Y., Eldeniz, C., Gan, W., An, H., Kamilov, U.S.: Rare: Image reconstruction using deep priors learned without groundtruth. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. 14(6), 1088–1099 (2020)10.1109/JSTSP.2020.2998402 ↗
37. Hu, Y., Delbracio, M., Milanfar, P., Kamilov, U.S.: A restoration network as an implicit prior. arXiv:2310.01391. (2023)
38. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18, pp. 234–241 (2015). Springer10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
39. Kingma, D.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Int Conf Learn Represent (2014)
40. Parker, D.L.: Optimal short scan convolution reconstruction for fan beam ct. Med. Phys. 9(2), 254–257 (1982)10.1118/1.595078 ↗
41. Tuy, H.: Reconstruction of a three-dimensional object from a limited range of views. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 80(2), 598–616 (1981)10.1016/0022-247X(81)90126-8 ↗
42. Tuy, H.K.: An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 43(3), 546–552 (1983)10.1137/0143035 ↗
43. Poludniowski, G., Omar, A., Bujila, R., Andreo, P.: Spekpy v2. 0–a software toolkit for modeling x-ray tube spectra. Med. Phys. 48(7), 3630–3637 (2021)10.1002/mp.14945 ↗
44. Bujila, R., Omar, A., Poludniowski, G.: A validation of spekpy: A software toolkit for modelling x-ray tube spectra. Phys. Med. 75, 44–54 (2020)10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.026 ↗
45. Cai, J., Chen, X., Huang, W., Mou, X.: Image quality assessment on ct reconstruction images: Task-specific vs. general quality assessment. Fully3D. (2017)
46. Otsu, N., et al.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica 11(285–296), 23–27 (1975)
47. Hofmann, J., Flisch, A., Zboray, R.: Principles for an implementation of a complete ct reconstruction tool chain for arbitrary sized data sets and its gpu optimization. J. Imaging 8(1), 12 (2022)10.3390/jimaging8010012 ↗