Evaluation and Mitigation of Domain Shift Impact between Volumetric Submicro-Scale and Micro-Scale Computed Tomography Systems in the Context of Automated Binary Wood Classification
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Rapid and reliable automated identification of wood species can be a boon for applications across wood scientific context including forestry and biodiversity conservation, as well as in an industrial context via requirements for timber trade regulations. However, robust machine learning classifiers must be properly analyzed and immunized against domain shift effects. These can degrade the automated system performance for input data variations occurring in many real-world scenarios. This work methodologically analyses the domain shift generated by using two differing sub-micro-scale and micro-scale computed tomography setups in the focused context of deep learning based binary wood classification from volumetric image data. To counteract this, we examine several mitigation strategies and propose primary data-level and narrow model-level strategies to effectively and successfully minimize the performance domain gap. Core elements of the data-wise strategy include the combined usage of phase-correction methods, low-pass pyramid representation of the data and adjustments of model normalization and regularization. Vanishing domain performance differences led to the conclusion that the combined strategy ultimately prompted the model to learn robust features. These features are discriminative for the utilized wood species data from both sub-micro-system and micro-system domains, despite the substantial differences in data acquisition setup that propagate into fundamental image quality metrics like resolution, contrast and signal-to-noise ratio.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. Niemz, P., Teischinger, A., Sandberg, D. (eds.): Springer Handbook of Wood Science and Technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2023)
2. Siau, J.F.: Transport Processes in Wood. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (1984)10.1007/978-3-642-69213-0 ↗
3. Rowell, R.M. (ed.): Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla (2013)
4. Davis, J., Wells, P.: Computed tomographymeasurements on wood. Ind. Metrol. 2, 195–218 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5956(92)80004-D10.1016/0921-5956(92)80004-D ↗
5. Koch, G., Haag, V.: Control of internationally traded Timber - The role of macroscopic and microscopic wood identification against illegal logging. J. Forensic Res. 06 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.100031710.4172/2157-7145.1000317 ↗
6. Low, M.C., Schmitz, N., Boeschoten, L.E., Cabezas, J.A., Cramm, M., Haag, V., Koch, G., Meyer-Sand, B.R.V., Paredes-Villanueva, K., Price, E., Thornhill, A.H., Van Brusselen, J., Zuidema, P.A., Deklerck, V., Dormontt, E.E., Shapcott, A., Lowe, A.J.: Tracing The world’s timber: The status of scientific verification technologies for species and origin identification. IAWA J. 44, 63–84 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-bja1009710.1163/22941932-bja10097 ↗
7. Kobayashi, K., Hwang, S.-W., Okochi, T., Lee, W.-H., Sugiyama, J.: Non-destructive method for wood identification using conventional X-ray computed tomography data. J. Cult. Herit. 38, 88–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.02.00110.1016/j.culher.2019.02.001 ↗
8. Dierickx, S., Genbrugge, S., Beeckman, H., Hubau, W., Kibleur, P., Van Den Bulcke, J.: Non-destructive wood identification using X-ray µCT scanning: Which resolution do we need? Plant. Methods. 20, 98 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-024-01216-010.1186/s13007-024-01216-0 ↗
9. Beeckman, H., Blanc-Jolivet, C., Boeschoten, L.E., Braga, J.W.B., Cabezas, J.A., Chaix, G., Crameri, S., Degen, B., Deklerck, V., Dormontt, E., Espinoza, E., Gasson, P., Haag, V., Helmling, S., Horacek, M., Koch, G., Lancaster, C., Lens, F., Lowe, A., Martínez-Jarquín, S., Nowakowska, J.A., Olbrich, A., Paredes-Villanueva, K., Pastore, T.C.M., Ramananantoandro, T., Razafimahatratra, A., Ravindran, P., Rees, G., Soares, L.F., Tysklind, N., Vlam, M., Watkinson, C., Wheeler, E., Winkler, R., Wiedenhoeft, A.C., Zemke, V.T., Zuidema, P.A., Brusselen, J.V., Bolanos, J., Schmitz, N.: Overview of current practices in data analysis for wood identification. A guide for the different timber tracking methods. (2020). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21518.7968910.13140/RG.2.2.21518.79689 ↗
10. Haag, V., Dremel, K., Zabler, S.: Volumetric imaging by micro computed tomography: A suitable tool for wood identification of charcoal. IAWA J. 44, 210–224 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-bja1010610.1163/22941932-bja10106 ↗
11. Martins, J., Oliveira, L.S., Nisgoski, S., Sabourin, R.: A database for automatic classification of forest species. Mach. Vis. Appl. 24, 567–578 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-012-0417-510.1007/s00138-012-0417-5 ↗
12. von Arx, G., Crivellaro, A., Prendin, A.L., Čufar, K., Carrer, M.: Quantitative wood Anatomy—Practical guidelines. Front. Plant. Sci. 7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.0078110.3389/fpls.2016.00781 ↗
13. Haneca, K., Deforce, K., Boone, M.N., Van Loo, D., Dierick, M., Van Acker, J., Van Den Bulcke, J.: X-ray sub-micron tomography as a tool for the study of archaeological wood preserved through the corrosion of metal objects. Archaeometry. 54, 893–905 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2011.00640.x10.1111/j.1475-4754.2011.00640.x ↗
14. Fioravanti, M., Di Giulio, G., Signorini, G.: A non-invasive approach to identifying wood species in historical musical instruments. J. Cult. Herit. 27, 70–S77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.05.01210.1016/j.culher.2016.05.012 ↗
15. Van den Bulcke, J., Van Loo, D., Dierick, M., Masschaele, B., Van Hoorebeke, L., Van Acker, J.: Nondestructive research on wooden musical instruments: From macro- to microscale imaging with lab-based X-ray CT systems. J. Cult. Herit. 27, S78–S87 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.01.01010.1016/j.culher.2016.01.010 ↗
16. Lens, F., Liang, C., Guo, Y., Tang, X., Jahanbanifard, M., Da Silva, F.S.C., Ceccantini, G., Verbeek, F.J.: Computer-assisted timber identification based on features extracted from microscopic wood sections. IAWA J. 41, 660–680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-bja1002910.1163/22941932-bja10029 ↗
17. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.H.: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction : with 200 full-color Illustrations. Springer, New York (2001)
18. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature. 521, 436–444 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1453910.1038/nature14539 ↗
19. Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Humaidi, A.J., Al-Dujaili, A., Duan, Y., Al-Shamma, O., Santamaría, J., Fadhel, M.A., Al-Amidie, M., Farhan, L.: Review of deep learning: Concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. J. Big Data. 8, 53 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00444-810.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 ↗
20. Hwang, S.-W., Sugiyama, J.: Computer vision-based wood identification and its expansion and contribution potentials in wood science: A review. Plant. Methods. 17, 47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-021-00746-110.1186/s13007-021-00746-1 ↗
21. Silva, J.L., Bordalo, R., Pissarra, J., De Palacios, P.: Computer Vision-Based Wood Identification: A Review. Forests. 13, 2041 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/f1312204110.3390/f13122041 ↗
22. Hermanson, J.C., Wiedenhoeft, A.C.: A brief review of machine vision in the context of automated wood identification systems. IAWA J. 32, 233–250 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-9000005410.1163/22941932-90000054 ↗
23. Nasirzadeh, M., Khazael, A.A., Khalid, M.: Woods Recognition System Based on Local Binary Pattern. In: 2010 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems and Networks. pp. 308–313 (2010)10.1109/CICSyN.2010.27 ↗
24. SUGIYAMA, J., HWANG, S.W., ZHAI, S., KOBAYASHI, K., KANAI, I.: KANAI, K.: Xylarium Digital Database for Wood Information Science and Education (XDD_008), (2020). https://doi.org/10.14989/XDD_00810.14989/XDD_008 ↗
25. Filho, P.L.P., Oliveira, L.S., Nisgoski, S., Britto, A.S.: Forest species recognition using macroscopic images. Mach. Vis. Appl. 25, 1019–1031 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-014-0592-710.1007/s00138-014-0592-7 ↗
26. Ravindran, P., Wiedenhoeft, A.C.: Comparison of two forensic wood identification technologies for ten meliaceae woods: Computer vision versus mass spectrometry. Wood Sci. Technol. 54, 1139–1150 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01178-110.1007/s00226-020-01178-1 ↗
27. Rankin, K.E., Hazell, Z.J., Middleton, A.M., Mavrogordato, M.N.: Micro-focus X-ray CT scanning of two rare wooden objects from the wreck of the London, and its application in heritage science and conservation. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 39, 103158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.10315810.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103158 ↗
28. Stelzner, J., Million, S., Stelzner, I., Nelle, O., Banck-Burgess, J.: Micro-computed tomography for the identification and characterization of archaeological lime bark. Sci. Rep. 13, 6458 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33633-x10.1038/s41598-023-33633-x ↗
29. Kwon, O., Lee, H.G., Lee, M.-R., Jang, S., Yang, S.-Y., Park, S.-Y., Choi, I.-G., Yeo, H.: Automatic wood species identification of Korean softwood based on convolutional neural networks. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 45, 797–808 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2017.45.6.79710.5658/WOOD.2017.45.6.797 ↗
30. Fabijańska, A., Danek, M., Barniak, J.: Wood species automatic identification from wood core images with a residual convolutional neural network. Comput. Electron. Agric. 181, 105941 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.10594110.1016/j.compag.2020.105941 ↗
31. Bello, R.-W.: Wood species identification using mask RCNN-Residual network. LIGNO. 19, 41–51 (2023)
32. Vacek, O., Gergeľ, T., Bucha, T., Gracovský, R., Gejdoš, M.: Automatic wood species classification and pith detection in log CT images. Forests. 15, 2207 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/f1512220710.3390/f15122207 ↗
33. Zabler, S., Maisl, M., Hornberger, P., Hiller, J., Fella, C., Hanke, R.: X-ray imaging and computed tomography for engineering applications. Tm - Tech. Mess. 88, 211–226 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2019-015110.1515/teme-2019-0151 ↗
34. Zabler, S., Ullherr, M., Fella, C., Schielein, R., Focke, O., Zeller-Plumhoff, B., Lhuissier, P., DeBoever, W., Hanke, R.: Comparing image quality in phase contrast sub µ X-ray tomography—A round-robin study. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. Accel Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 951, 162992 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2019.16299210.1016/j.nima.2019.162992 ↗
35. Patterson, M.S., Foster, F.S.: The improvement and quantitative assessment of B-mode images produced by an annular array/cone hybrid. Ultrason. Imaging. 5, 195–213 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1177/01617346830050030110.1177/016173468300500301 ↗
36. Mayo, S.C., Stevenson, A.W., Wilkins, S.W.: In-Line Phase-Contrast X-ray imaging and tomography for materials science. Mater. Basel Switz. 5, 937–965 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma505093710.3390/ma5050937 ↗
37. Paganin, D., Mayo, S.C., Gureyev, T.E., Miller, P.R., Wilkins, S.W.: Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J. Microsc. 206, 33–40 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.x ↗
38. Ullherr, M., Zabler, S., Grätz, J., Hanke, R.: PyXIT: Python GUI software for CT imaging, learning and experimental algorithms; example: Multi material phase retrieval. E-J. Nondestruct Test. 24, (2019)
39. Wiener, N.: Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary time Series: with Engineering Applications. The MIT Press (1949)10.7551/mitpress/2946.001.0001 ↗
40. Feurer, M., Hutter, F.: Hyperparameter optimization. In: Hutter, F., Kotthoff, L., Vanschoren, J. (eds.) Automated Machine Learning, pp. 3–33. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019)10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5_1 ↗
41. Vapnik, V.: Principles of risk minimization for learning theory. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. pp. 831–838 (1992)
42. Hanson, S., Pratt, L.: Comparing Biases for Minimal Network Construction with Back-Propagation. In: Touretzky, D. (ed.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Morgan-Kaufmann (1988)
43. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014)
44. Wilamowski, B.M., Yu, H.: Improved computation for Levenberg–Marquardt training. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 21, 930–937 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2010.204565710.1109/TNN.2010.2045657 ↗
45. Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York (2006)
46. Tan, H.H., Lim, K.H.: Review of second-order optimization techniques in artificial neural networks backpropagation. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 495, 012003 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/495/1/01200310.1088/1757-899X/495/1/012003 ↗
47. Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization. ArXiv171105101 Cs Math. (2019)
48. Kiefer, J., Wolfowitz, J.: Stochastic Estimation of the maximum of a regression function. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 462–466 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/117772939210.1214/aoms/1177729392 ↗
49. Robbins, H., Monro, S.: A stochastic approximation method. Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 400–407 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/117772958610.1214/aoms/1177729586 ↗
50. Taha, A.A., Hanbury, A.: Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: Analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med. Imaging. 15, 29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x ↗
51. Fukushima, K.: Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol. Cybern. 36, 193–202 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0034425110.1007/BF00344251 ↗
52. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 770–778 (2016)10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
53. Fukushima, K.: Visual feature extraction by a multilayered network of analog threshold elements. IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. 5, 322–333 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1969.30022510.1109/TSSC.1969.300225 ↗
54. Ioffe, S., Szegedy, C.: Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. (2015). ArXiv150203167 Cs
55. Ulyanov, D., Vedaldi, A., Lempitsky, V.: Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylization. ArXiv160708022 Cs. (2017)
56. Hinton, G.E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors, (2012). http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0580
57. Kim, B.J., Choi, H., Jang, H., Lee, D., Kim, S.W.: How to Use Dropout Correctly on Residual Networks with Batch Normalization, (2023). http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06112
58. Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L.: Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. pp. 8026–8037 (2019)
59. Harris, C.R., Millman, K.J., van der Walt, S.J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N.J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M.H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J.F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., Gérard-Marchant, P., Sheppard, K., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Abbasi, H., Gohlke, C., Oliphant, T.E.: Array programming with numpy. Nature. 585, 357–362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-210.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
60. Alistair Miles, Hamman, J., Orfanos, D.P., Stansby, D., Bussonnier, M., Moore, J., Bennett, D., Augspurger, T., Rzepka, N., Cherian, D., Verma, S., Bourbeau, J., Fulton, A., Spitz, H., Abernathey, R., Lee, G., Jones, M., Kristensen, M.R.B., Patel, Z.: Saransh Chopra, Matthew Rocklin, Nathan Zimmerman, AWA BRANDON AWA, Elliott Sales de Andrade, Martin Durant, Juan Nunez-Iglesias, Vincent Schut: zarr-developers/zarr-python: v3.0.7, (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.377344910.5281/zenodo.3773449 ↗
61. Lindeberg, T.: Scale-space Theory in Computer Vision. Kluwer academic publ, Boston (1994)10.1007/978-1-4757-6465-9 ↗
62. Adelson, E., Anderson, C., Bergen, J., Burt, P., Ogden, J.: Pyramid methods in image processing. RCA Eng. 29, (1983)
63. Fegade, P., Chen, T., Gibbons, P.B., Mowry, T.C.: The CoRa Tensor Compiler: Compilation for Ragged Tensors with Minimal Padding, (2022). http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.10221
64. Micikevicius, P., Narang, S., Alben, J., Diamos, G., Elsen, E., Garcia, D., Ginsburg, B., Houston, M., Kuchaiev, O., Venkatesh, G., Wu, H.: Mixed Precision Training. ArXiv171003740 Cs Stat. (2018)
65. Shorten, C., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. J. Big Data. 6, 60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0197-010.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 ↗
66. Morelli, J.N., Runge, V.M., Ai, F., Attenberger, U., Vu, L., Schmeets, S.H., Nitz, W.R., Kirsch, J.E.: An Image-based approach to Understanding the physics of MR artifacts. RadioGraphics. 31, 849–866 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.31310511510.1148/rg.313105115 ↗
67. Cardoso, M.J., Li, W., Brown, R., Ma, N., Kerfoot, E., Wang, Y., Murrey, B., Myronenko, A., Zhao, C., Yang, D., Nath, V., He, Y., Xu, Z., Hatamizadeh, A., Myronenko, A., Zhu, W., Liu, Y., Zheng, M., Tang, Y., Yang, I., Zephyr, M., Hashemian, B., Alle, S., Darestani, M.Z., Budd, C., Modat, M., Vercauteren, T., Wang, G., Li, Y., Hu, Y., Fu, Y., Gorman, B., Johnson, H., Genereaux, B., Erdal, B.S., Gupta, V., Diaz-Pinto, A., Dourson, A., Maier-Hein, L., Jaeger, P.F., Baumgartner, M., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Flores, M., Kirby, J., Cooper, L.A.D., Roth, H.R., Xu, D., Bericat, D., Floca, R., Zhou, S.K., Shuaib, H., Farahani, K., Maier-Hein, K.H., Aylward, S., Dogra, P., Ourselin, S., Feng, A.: MONAI: An open-source framework for deep learning in healthcare, http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02701, (2022)
68. Xie, S., Girshick, R., Dollár, P., Tu, Z., He, K.: Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks, (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.0543110.1109/CVPR.2017.634 ↗
69. Bello, I., Fedus, W., Du, X., Cubuk, E.D., Srinivas, A., Lin, T.-Y., Shlens, J., Zoph, B.: Revisiting ResNets: Improved Training and Scaling Strategies, (2021). http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.07579
70. Santurkar, S., Tsipras, D., Ilyas, A., Madry, A.: How does batch normalization help optimization? In: Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc (2018)
71. Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., Batra, D.: Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via Gradient-based localization. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 128, 336–359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-019-01228-710.1007/s11263-019-01228-7 ↗
72. Gildenblat, J.: contributors: PyTorch library for CAM methods, (2021). https://github.com/jacobgil/pytorch-grad-cam
73. Grabner, M., Salaberger, D., Okochi, T.: The need of high resolution µ-X-ray CT in dendrochronology and in wood identification. In: 2009 Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis. pp. 349–352. IEEE, Salzburg (2009)10.1109/ISPA.2009.5297695 ↗
74. Dormontt, E.E., Boner, M., Braun, B., Breulmann, G., Degen, B., Espinoza, E., Gardner, S., Guillery, P., Hermanson, J.C., Koch, G., Lee, S.L., Kanashiro, M., Rimbawanto, A., Thomas, D., Wiedenhoeft, A.C., Yin, Y., Zahnen, J., Lowe, A.J.: Forensic timber identification: It’s time to integrate disciplines to combat illegal logging. Biol. Conserv. 191, 790–798 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.03810.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.038 ↗
75. Seibold, S., Müller, J., Allner, S., Willner, M., Baldrian, P., Ulyshen, M.D., Brandl, R., Bässler, C., Hagge, J., Mitesser, O.: Quantifying wood decomposition by insects and fungi using computed tomography scanning and machine learning. Sci. Rep. 12, 16150 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20377-310.1038/s41598-022-20377-3 ↗
76. Patera, A., Bonnin, A., Mokso, R.: Micro- and Nano-Scales Three-Dimensional characterisation of softwood. J. Imaging. 7, 263 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging712026310.3390/jimaging7120263 ↗
77. Fei, J., Deng, Z.: Rotation invariance and equivariance in 3D deep learning: A survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 57, 168 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10741-210.1007/s10462-024-10741-2 ↗
78. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., Houlsby, N.: An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale. Presented at the International Conference on Learning Representations October 2 (2020)
79. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, Ł., Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need. In: Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates, Inc (2017)