journal article·2025-03

Bayesian Method for Estimating Equivalent Initial Size Distribution of Hidden Crack Under Fastener Head

Youngchan Kim, Seonhwa Jung, Dooyoul Lee

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. U.S. Department of Defense: Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP). MIL-STD-1530D, Washington (2016)
2. Miedlar, P. C., Berens, A.P., Gunderson, A., Gallagher, J.P.: USAF Damage Tolerant Design Handbook: Guidelines for the Analysis and Design of Damage Tolerant Aircraft Structures. AFRL-VA-WP-TR-2003-3002, Dayton (2002)
3. Wu, W.-S., Yang, C.-F., Chang, J.-C., Château, P.-A., Chang, Y.-C.: Risk assessment by integrating interpretive structural modeling and Bayesian network, case of offshore pipeline project. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 142, 515–524 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.06.01310.1016/j.ress.2015.06.013 ↗
4. Kwag, S., Gupta, A.: Probabilistic risk assessment framework for structural systems under multiple hazards using Bayesian statistics. Nucl. Eng. Des. 315, 20–34 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.02.00910.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.02.009 ↗
5. Berto, L., Saetta, A., Simioni, P.: Structural risk assessment of corroding RC structures under seismic excitation. Constr. Build. Mater. 30, 803–813 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.039 ↗
6. Ji, J., Robert, D.J., Zhang, C., Zhang, D., Kodikara, J.: Probabilistic physical modelling of corroded cast iron pipes for lifetime prediction. Struct. Saf. 64, 62–75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.09.00410.1016/j.strusafe.2016.09.004 ↗
7. Cardellicchio, A., Ruggieri, S., Nettis, A., Renò, V., Uva, G.: Physical interpretation of machine learning-based recognition of defects for the risk management of existing bridge heritage. Eng. Fail. Anal. 149, 107237 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10723710.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107237 ↗
8. Yang, J.N., Manning, S.D.: Distribution of equivalent initial flaw size. In: Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, San Francisco, pp. 112–120 (1980)
9. Liu, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using an equivalent initial flaw size distribution. Int. J. Fatigue 31(3), 476–487 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.005 ↗
10. Sankararaman, S., Ling, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Uncertainty quantification and model validation of fatigue crack growth prediction. Eng. Fract. Mech. 78(7), 1487–1504 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.01710.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.017 ↗
11. Lee, D., Achenbach, J.D.: Analysis of the reliability of a jet engine compressor rotor blade containing a fatigue crack. J. Appl. Mech. 83(4), 041004 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403237610.1115/1.4032376 ↗
12. Giannella, V.: Uncertainty quantification in fatigue crack-growth predictions. Int. J. Fract. 235(2), 179–195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-022-00624-410.1007/s10704-022-00624-4 ↗
13. Giannella, V.: Stochastic approach to fatigue crack-growth simulation for a railway axle under input data variability. Int. J. Fatigue (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10604410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106044 ↗
14. Zhuang, M., Morse, L., Sharif Khodaei, Z., Aliabadi, M.H.: Bayesian-informed fatigue life prediction in shallow shell structures with the dual boundary element method. Eng. Fract. Mech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11034810.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110348 ↗
15. F-15 ASIP Team: F-15K aircraft structural integrity program—distribution parameter report. St. Louis (2022)
16. Lin, Y.K., Yang, J.N.: On statistical moments of fatigue crack propagation. Eng. Fract. Mech. 18(2), 243–256 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(83)90136-410.1016/0013-7944(83)90136-4 ↗
17. Yang, J.N., Manning, S.D.: Stochastic crack growth analysis methodologies for metallic structures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 37(5), 1105–1124 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(90)90032-C10.1016/0013-7944(90)90032-C ↗
18. Yang, J.N., Manning, S.D.: A simple second order approximation for stochastic crack growth analysis. Eng. Fract. Mech. 53(5), 677–686 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(95)00130-110.1016/0013-7944(95)00130-1 ↗
19. Fawaz, S.A.: Equivalent Initial Flaw Size Testing and Analysis. Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB (2000)10.21236/ADA387280 ↗
20. Kitagawa, H., Takahashi, S.: Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks or cracks in early stage. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mechanical Behavior of Materials. ASM International, Cleveland (1976)
21. El Haddad, M.H., Topper, T.H., Smith, K.N.: Prediction of non propagating cracks. Eng. Fract. Mech. 11(3), 573–584 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X10.1016/0013-7944(79)90081-X ↗
22. Sankararaman, S., Ling, Y., Mahadevan, S.: Statistical inference of equivalent initial flaw size with complicated structural geometry and multi-axial variable amplitude loading. Int. J. Fatigue 32(10), 1689–1700 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.03.01210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.03.012 ↗
23. Morse, L., Sharif Khodaei, Z., Aliabadi, M.H.: Statistical inference of the equivalent initial flaw size for assembled plate structures with the dual boundary element method. Eng. Fract. Mech. 238, 107271 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10727110.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107271 ↗
24. Lee, D., Lim, D., Kim, H., Baek, S.: Bayesian method for estimating initial crack size distribution for probabilistic risk analysis of repairable structural details. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 45(8), 2356–2370 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.1375110.1111/ffe.13751 ↗
25. U.S. Department of Defense: Nondestructive Evaluation System Reliability Assessment. MIL-HDBK-1823A, Washington (2009)
26. Lee, D., Yoon, S., Park, J., Eum, S., Cho, H.: Demonstration of model-assisted probability of detection framework for ultrasonic inspection of cracks in compressor blades. NDT&E Int. 128, 102618 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10261810.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102618 ↗
27. Korbel, A.: Effect of aircraft rivet installation process and production variables on residual stress, clamping force and fatigue behaviour of thin sheet riveted lap joints. Thin-Walled Struct. 181, 110041 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.11004110.1016/j.tws.2022.110041 ↗
28. Jarvis, R., Cawley, P., Nagy, P.B.: Performance evaluation of a magnetic field measurement NDE technique using a model assisted Probability of Detection framework. NDT&E Int. 91, 61–70 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.06.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2017.06.006 ↗
29. Matias, C., Brot, A., Senderovits, W.: Defining experimentally the probability of detection of hidden second-layer cracks. In: USAF Aircraft Structural Integrity Program Conference, San Antonio (2006)
30. Harding, C., Hugo, G., Bowles, S.: Model-assisted probability of detection validation of automated ultrasonic scanning for crack detection at fastener holes. In: Proceedings of 10th Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Conference on Aging Aircraft, Palm Springs (2007)
31. Uemura, C.O.: Probability of Detection for Pulsed Eddy Current Inspection of Second Layer Cracks in Aircraft Lap-Joint Structures. Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston (2018)
32. Chebout, M., Azizi, H., Mekideche, M.R.: A model assisted probability of detection approach for ECNDT of hidden defect in aircraft structures. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 95, 1–8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERL2009270110.2528/PIERL20092701 ↗
33. Kim, N.-H., An, D., Choi, J.-H.: Prognostics and Health Management of Engineering Systems. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44742-110.1007/978-3-319-44742-1 ↗
34. U.S. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center: In-Service Inspection Crack Size Assumptions for Metallic Structures. EN-SB-08-012, Revision D, Wright-Patterson AFB (2018)
35. Paris, P., Erdogan, F.: A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. J. Basic Eng. 85(4), 528–533 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.365690010.1115/1.3656900 ↗
36. Forman, R.G., Kearney, V.E., Engle, R.M.: Numerical analysis of crack propagation in cyclic-loaded structures. J. Basic Eng. 89(3), 459–463 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.360963710.1115/1.3609637 ↗
37. Weertman, J.: Rate of growth of fatigue cracks calculated from the theory of infinitesimal dislocations distributed on a plane. Int. J. Fract.Mech. 2(2), 460–467 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0018382310.1007/BF00183823 ↗
38. Chowdhury, S., Deeb, M., Zabel, V.: Effects of parameter estimation techniques and uncertainty on the selection of fatigue crack growth model. Structures 19, 128–142 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.11.01810.1016/j.istruc.2018.11.018 ↗
39. Chowdhury, S., Zabel, V.: Stochastic selection of fatigue crack growth model for a damaged bridge gusset plate. Int. J. Fatigue (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10767410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107674 ↗
40. Zhao, Z., Haldar, A.: Bridge fatigue damage evaluation and updating using non-destructive inspections. Eng. Fract. Mech. 53(5), 775–788 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(95)00136-010.1016/0013-7944(95)00136-0 ↗
41. Lee, D., Yang, S., Park, J., Baek, S., Kim, S.: Investigation of detectable crack length in a bolt hole using eddy current inspection. Trans. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng. A 41(8), 729–736 (2017)
42. Boeing: LifeWorks User’s Manual (F-15K Version Revision E). St. Louis (2013)
43. U.S. Air Force: Nondestructive Inspection General Procedures Process Controls. T.O. 33B-1-2, Tinker AFB (2006)
44. U.S. Department of Defense: Aircraft Structure. JSSG-2006, Washington (1998)
45. U.S. Department of Defense. System Safety: MIL-STD-882E, Washington (2012)10.21236/ADA591584 ↗
46. Goldstein, H., Healy, M.J.R.: The graphical presentation of a collection of means. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 158(1), 175 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/298341110.2307/2983411 ↗
47. Cumming, G., Finch, S.: Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am. Psychol. 60(2), 170–180 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.17010.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170 ↗
48. Li, M., Spencer, F.W., Meeker, W.Q.: Distinguishing between uncertainty and variability in nondestructive evaluation. AIP Conf. Proc. 1430(31), 1725–1732 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471642010.1063/1.4716420 ↗