Application of Dual-target Computed Tomography for Material Decomposition of Low-Z Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The extension of conventional computed tomography known as spectral computed tomography involves utilizing the variations in X-ray attenuation, driven by spectral and material dependencies. This technique enables the virtual decomposition of scanned objects, revealing their elemental constituents. The resultant images provide quantitative information, such as material concentration within the scanned volume. Enhancements in results are achievable through methods that capitalize on the strong correlation among decomposed images, effectively minimizing noise and artifacts. The Rigaku nano3DX submicron tomograph uses a dual-target source, which allows the generation of two distinct X-ray spectra through different target materials. This configuration holds promise for high-resolution applications in spectral tomography, particularly for low-Z materials, where it offers high contrast in the acquired images. The potential of this setup in the context of spectral computed tomography is explored in this contribution, delving into its applications for materials characterized by low atomic numbers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications · Nuclear Physics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Heismann, B.J., Schmidt, B.T., Flohr, T.: Spectral computed tomography, SPIE Press, Bellingham. Wash (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/3.97754610.1117/3.977546 ↗
2. Rebuffel, V., Dinten, J.-M.: Dual-energy x-ray imaging: benefits and limits. Insight - Non-Destructive Testing Cond. Monit. 49(10), 589–594 (2007)10.1784/insi.2007.49.10.589 ↗
3. Mendonca, P.R.S., Lamb, P., Sahani, D.V.: A flexible method for multi-material decomposition of dual-energy CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 33(1), 99–116 (2014)10.1109/TMI.2013.2281719 ↗
4. T. Fuchs, P. Keßling, M. Firsching, F. Nachtrab, G. Scholz, Industrial applications of dual x-ray energy computed tomography (2x-CT), in: Nondestructive Testing of Materials and Structures, Vol. 6, Springer Netherlands, 2011, pp. 97–103, series Title: RILEM Bookseries. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0723-8_1310.1007/978-94-007-0723-8_13 ↗
5. D. Vavrik, J. Jakubek, I. Kumpova, M. Pichotka, Dual energy CT inspection of a carbon fibre reinforced plastic composite combined with metal components, Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation 6 (2016) 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.001 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221465711630010710.1016/j.csndt.2016.05.001 ↗
6. Y. Takeda, K. Hamada, A primer on the use of the nano3dx high-resolution x-ray microscope, Rigaku J (2015)
7. M. Zemek, P. Blažek, J. Šrámek, J. Šalplachta, T. Zikmund, P. Klapetek, Y. Takeda, K. Omote, J. Kaiser, Voxel size calibration for high-resolution ct, in: 10th Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography (iCT) 2020, NDT.net, Wels, Austria, 2020, p. 8. https://doi.org/10.58286/25109 https://www.ndt.net/search/docs.php3?id=2510910.58286/25109 ↗
8. C. Bellon, A. Deresch, C. Gollwitzer, G.-R. Jaenisch, Radiographic simulator artist: Version 2, in: WCNDT 2012, Vol. 17 of 7, NDT.net, Durban, South Africa, 2012, p. 7. www.ndt.net/search/docs.php3?id=12664
9. Handschuh, S., Beisser, C.J., Ruthensteiner, B., Metscher, B.D.: Microscopic dual-energy CT (microDECT): a flexible tool for multichannel ex vivo 3d imaging of biological specimens. J. Microsc. 267(1), 3–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.1254310.1111/jmi.12543 ↗
10. Paziresh, M., Kingston, A.M., Latham, S.J., Fullagar, W.K., Myers, G.M.: Tomography of atomic number and density of materials using dual-energy imaging and the alvarez and macovski attenuation model. J. Appl. Phys. 119(21), 214901 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.495080710.1063/1.4950807 ↗
11. Alvarez, R.E., Macovski, A.: Energy-selective reconstructions in x-ray computerised tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 21(5), 733–744 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/21/5/00210.1088/0031-9155/21/5/002 ↗
12. Q. Ding, T. Niu, X. Zhang, Y. Long, Image-domain multi-material decomposition for dual-energy CT based on correlation and sparsity of material images, Medical Physics 45 (8) (2018) 3614–3626. arxiv:1710.07028 [physics] https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.1300110.1002/mp.13001 ↗
13. Biswas, R., Sahadath, H., Mollah, A.S., Huq, M.F.: Calculation of gamma-ray attenuation parameters for locally developed shielding material: Polyboron. J. Radiation Res. Appl. Sci. 9(1), 26–34 (2016)
14. B. Heismann, L. Bätz, K. Pham-Gia, W. Metzger, D. Niederlöhner, S. Wirth, Signal transport in computed tomography detectors, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 591 (1) (2008) 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.03.018 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016890020800394X10.1016/j.nima.2008.03.018 ↗
15. J. C. A. Barata, M. S. Hussein, The moore-penrose pseudoinverse. a tutorial review of the theory, Brazilian Journal of Physics 42 (1) (2012) 146–165., https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-011-0052-z arXiv: 1110.6882 [math-ph]10.1007/s13538-011-0052-z ↗
16. Lee, H., Kim, H.-J., Lee, D., Kim, D., Choi, S., Lee, M.: Improvement with the multi-material decomposition framework in dual-energy computed tomography: A phantom study. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 77(6), 515–523 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.51510.3938/jkps.77.515 ↗
17. Jiang, Y., Zhang, X., Sheng, K., Niu, T., Xue, Y., Lyu, Q., Xu, L., Luo, C., Yang, P., Yang, C., Wang, J., Hu, X.: Noise suppression in image-domain multi-material decomposition for dual-energy CT. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 67(2), 523–535 (2020)10.1109/TBME.2019.2916907 ↗
18. Petrongolo, M., Zhu, L.: Noise suppression for dual-energy CT through entropy minimization. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 34(11), 2286–2297 (2015)10.1109/TMI.2015.2429000 ↗
19. Xue, Y., Ruan, R., Hu, X., Kuang, Y., Wang, J., Long, Y., Niu, T.: Statistical image-domain multimaterial decomposition for dual-energy CT. Med. Phys. 44(3), 886–901 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.1209610.1002/mp.12096 ↗
20. S. L. Brunton, J. N. Kutz, Data-Driven Science and Engineering: Machine Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Control, 1st Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108380690 https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108380690/type/book10.1017/9781108380690 ↗
21. Feldkamp, L.A., Davis, L.C., Kress, J.W.: Practical cone-beam algorithm. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1(6), 612 (1984)10.1364/JOSAA.1.000612 ↗
22. van Aarle, W., Palenstijn, W.J., De Beenhouwer, J., Altantzis, T., Bals, S., Batenburg, K.J., Sijbers, J.: The astra toolbox: a platform for advanced algorithm development in electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 157, 35–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.05.00210.1016/j.ultramic.2015.05.002 ↗
23. W. Van Aarle, W. J. Palenstijn, J. Cant, E. Janssens, F. Bleichrodt, A. Dabravolski, J. De Beenhouwer, K. Joost Batenburg, J. Sijbers, Fast and flexible x-ray tomography using the ASTRA toolbox, Optics Express 24 (22) (2016) 25129. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.025129 https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-24-22-2512910.1364/OE.24.025129 ↗
24. Park, H.S., Chung, Y.E., Seo, J.K.: Computed tomographic beam-hardening artefacts: mathematical characterization and analysis, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical. Phys. Eng. Sci. 373(2043), 20140388 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.038810.1098/rsta.2014.0388 ↗