Electrochemical decolorization of acid dye baths and their reuse potential in subsequent textile dyeing processes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the electrochemical decolorization of waste acid dye baths and evaluates their potential reuse in subsequent textile dyeing processes. Four different anode materials (iron, aluminum, stainless steel and graphite) were examined to optimize color removal efficiency and assess the influence of electrochemically generated by‐products on dyeing performance. Under optimized operating conditions, aluminum anodes achieved over 90% color removal without generating harmful chlorinated species. However, fabrics dyed in these treated baths exhibited noticeable color differences (ΔE >1), attributed to aluminum's mordanting effect, which enhanced dye uptake particularly for blue dyes. Conversely, iron anodes led to residual metal contamination, while steel and graphite promoted hypochlorite formation, causing dye degradation in subsequent acid dyeing cycles. To mitigate these limitations, iron‐treated baths were alkalized with Na 2 CO 3 and successfully reused in reactive dyeing. Additionally, a membrane‐separated electrochemical system effectively eliminated iron and hypochlorite, enabling the reuse of treated baths in vat dyeing applications. These findings highlight that electrochemical treatment not only facilitates substantial color removal but also supports sustainable water and chemical resource management in textile manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Environmental remediation with nanomaterials · Advanced oxidation water treatment · Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Agri Ibrahim Cecen University Agri Turkey
Erciyes University Kayseri Turkey
Funding
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.15244/pjoes/9194010.15244/pjoes/91940 ↗
2. 10.3390/w1407108410.3390/w14071084 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma906049010.3390/ma9060490 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.10297210.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102972 ↗
5. 10.20964/2019.02.2710.20964/2019.02.27 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.09310.1016/j.cej.2018.10.093 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.01710.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.19510.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.195 ↗
9. 10.1089/ees.2012.041710.1089/ees.2012.0417 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.06310.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.063 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.00610.1016/j.seppur.2003.10.006 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.03010.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.030 ↗
13. 10.37421/2380‐2391.2021.8.33010.37421/2380‐2391.2021.8.330 ↗
14. 10.1080/19443994.2012.71458510.1080/19443994.2012.714585 ↗
15. 10.1177/004051751141331610.1177/0040517511413316 ↗
16. 10.1088/1755‐1315/113/1/01220710.1088/1755‐1315/113/1/012207 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.00110.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.001 ↗
18. 10.1021/ie070675b10.1021/ie070675b ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9372(2006)132:3(32410.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9372(2006)132:3(324 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.00610.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.006 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma711734910.3390/ma7117349 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11757010.1016/j.seppur.2020.117570 ↗
23. Broadbent AD · 2001
24. 10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.130116410.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.1301164 ↗
25. 10.2105/SMWW.288210.2105/SMWW.2882 ↗
26. 10.1111/cote.1221210.1111/cote.12212 ↗
27. 10.2166/wrd.2017.09110.2166/wrd.2017.091 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1478‐4408.2011.00343.x10.1111/j.1478‐4408.2011.00343.x ↗
29. 10.19080/CTFTTE.2018.03.55561910.19080/CTFTTE.2018.03.555619 ↗