NDE Data Correlation Using Encoder–Decoder Networks with Wavelet Scalogram Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. Feizi, S., Baardvik, G.: Assessments of internal erosion in a landfill due to changes in groundwater level. Int. J. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 16, 6 (2022)
2. Lim, M.K., Cao, H.: Combining multiple NDT methods to improve testing effectiveness. Constr. Build. Mater. 38, 1310–1315 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.011 ↗
3. Gucunski, N., Kee, S.-H., La, H., Basily, B., Maher, A.: Delamination and concrete quality assessment of concrete bridge decks using a fully autonomous RABIT platform. Struct. Monit. Maint. 2, 19–34 (2015). https://doi.org/10.12989/SMM.2015.2.1.01910.12989/SMM.2015.2.1.019 ↗
4. Jarvis, R., Farinha, A., Kovac, M., Cegla, F.: NDE sensor delivery using unmanned aerial vehicles. Insight Non-Destr. Test. Cond. Monit. 60, 463–467 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2018.60.8.46310.1784/insi.2018.60.8.463 ↗
5. Guo, A., Jiang, A., Lin, J., Li, X.: Data mining algorithms for bridge health monitoring: Kohonen clustering and LSTM prediction approaches. J. Supercomput. 76, 932–947 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03045-810.1007/s11227-019-03045-8 ↗
6. Ida, N., Meyendorf, N. (eds.): Handbook of Advanced Nondestructive Evaluation. Springer, Cham (2019)
7. Worden, K., Cross, E.J.: On switching response surface models, with applications to the structural health monitoring of bridges. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 98, 139–156 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.04.02210.1016/j.ymssp.2017.04.022 ↗
8. Zhang, G.-M., Olofsson, T., Stepinski, T.: Ultrasonic NDE image compression by transform and subband coding. NDT E Int. 37, 325–333 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.10.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2003.10.007 ↗
9. de Moura, E.P., Normando, P.G., Gonçalves, L.L., Kruger, S.E.: Characterization of cast iron microstructure through fluctuation and fractal analyses of ultrasonic backscattered signals combined with classification techniques. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 31, 90–98 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-011-0124-610.1007/s10921-011-0124-6 ↗
10. Li, L., Cui, Y., Chen, R., Chen, L., Wang, L.: Research on rolling bearing fault feature extraction based on singular value decomposition considering the singular component accumulative effect and teager energy operator. Shock Vib. 2019, 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/374251210.1155/2019/3742512 ↗
11. Cui, X., Wang, Z., Kang, Y., Pu, H., Deng, Z.: A robust indicator based on singular value decomposition for flaw feature detection from noisy ultrasonic signals. Meas. Sci. Technol. 29, 055009 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aab02910.1088/1361-6501/aab029 ↗
12. Li, Z., Li, W., Zhao, X.: Feature frequency extraction based on singular value decomposition and its application on rotor faults diagnosis. J. Vib. Control. 25, 1246–1262 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/107754631881869010.1177/1077546318818690 ↗
13. Cao, R., Ma, M., Liang, R., Niu, C.: Detecting the void behind the tunnel lining by impact-echo methods with different signal analysis approaches. Appl. Sci. 9, 3280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app916328010.3390/app9163280 ↗
14. Rostami, B., Shanehsazzadeh, F., Fardmanesh, M.: Fast fourier transform based NDT approach for depth detection of hidden defects using HTS rf-SQUID. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28, 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2018.284192710.1109/TASC.2018.2841927 ↗
15. Shrestha, R., Kim, W.: Non-destructive testing and evaluation of materials using active thermography and enhancement of signal to noise ratio through data fusion. Infrared Phys. Technol. 94, 78–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2018.08.02710.1016/j.infrared.2018.08.027 ↗
16. Kim, H.M., Choi, D.-H.: Defects detection of gas pipeline near the welds based on self quotient image and discrete cosine transform. Russ. J. Nondestruct. Test. 52, 175–183 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106183091603004910.1134/S1061830916030049 ↗
17. Jin, X., Jiang, Q., Yao, S., Zhou, D., Nie, R., Lee, S.-J., He, K.: Infrared and visual image fusion method based on discrete cosine transform and local spatial frequency in discrete stationary wavelet transform domain. Infrared Phys. Technol. 88, 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2017.10.00410.1016/j.infrared.2017.10.004 ↗
18. Liu, S., Du, C., Mou, J., Martua, L., Zhang, J., Lewis, F.L.: Diagnosis of structural cracks using wavelet transform and neural networks. NDT E Int. 54, 9–18 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.11.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2012.11.004 ↗
19. Lonkar, A.A., Srivastava, R.K.: Crack detection in structure using wavelet transform and higher order differentiated mode shapes. Int. J. Mech. Eng. 1, 10 (2011)
20. Zhang, J.-K., Yan, W., Cui, D.-M.: Concrete condition assessment using impact-echo method and extreme learning machines. Sensors 16, 447 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1604044710.3390/s16040447 ↗
21. Epasto, G., Proverbio, E., Venturi, V.: Evaluation of fire-damaged concrete using impact-echo method. Mater. Struct. 43, 235–245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-009-9484-010.1617/s11527-009-9484-0 ↗
22. Qu, H., Li, M., Chen, G., Sneed, L.H., Anderson, N.L.: Multi-bandwidth wavelet transform of impact echo signals for delamination detection of thin concrete slabs. J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 6, 649–664 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0187-210.1007/s13349-016-0187-2 ↗
23. Virupakshappa, K., Oruklu, E.: Ultrasonic flaw detection using Hidden Markov Model with wavelet features. In: 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), pp. 1–4. IEEE, Tours (2016)10.1109/ULTSYM.2016.7728491 ↗
24. Yu, C.-P., Lin, Y., Chang, C.-C.: An effective crack-identification approach for impact echo signals using MWT spectrograms and scaled FFT spectra. Mater. Struct. 54, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01597-310.1617/s11527-020-01597-3 ↗
25. Qu, H., Li, T., Chen, G.: Adaptive wavelet transform: definition, parameter optimization algorithms, and application for concrete delamination detection from impact echo responses. Struct. Health Monit. 18, 1022–1039 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/147592171877620010.1177/1475921718776200 ↗
26. Selim, H., Delgado Prieto, M., Trull, J., Romeral, L., Cojocaru, C.: Laser ultrasound inspection based on wavelet transform and data clustering for defect estimation in metallic samples. Sensors 19, 573 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1903057310.3390/s19030573 ↗
27. Liu, T., Li, J., Cai, X., Yan, S.: A time-frequency analysis algorithm for ultrasonic waves generating from a debonding defect by using empirical wavelet transform. Appl. Acoust. 131, 16–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.10.00210.1016/j.apacoust.2017.10.002 ↗
28. Siracusano, G., Scuro, C., Garescì, F., Carpentieri, M., Finocchio, G.: Automatic crack detection and classification by exploiting statistical event descriptors for Deep Learning. 46
29. Pham, M.T., Kim, J.-M., Kim, C.H.: Accurate bearing fault diagnosis under variable shaft speed using convolutional neural networks and vibration spectrogram. Appl. Sci. 10, 6385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1018638510.3390/app10186385 ↗
30. Mohamadi, S., Lattanzi, D., Azari, H.: Fusion and visualization of bridge deck nondestructive evaluation data via machine learning. Front. Mater. 7, 576918 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.57691810.3389/fmats.2020.576918 ↗
31. Habibi Aghdam, H., Jahani Heravi, E.: Guide to Convolutional Neural Networks. Springer, Cham (2017)10.1007/978-3-319-57550-6 ↗
32. Khan, S., Rahmani, H., Shah, S.A.A., Bennamoun, M.: A guide to convolutional neural networks for computer vision. Synth. Lect. Comput. Vis. 8, 1–207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2200/S00822ED1V01Y201712COV01510.2200/S00822ED1V01Y201712COV015 ↗
33. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., Duong, T.H.: An algorithm for automatic localization and detection of rebars from GPR data of concrete bridge decks. Autom. Constr. 89, 292–298 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.01710.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.017 ↗
34. Aydin, E., Yuksel, S.E.: Buried target detection with ground penetrating radar using deep learning method. İn: 2017 25th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), pp. 1–4. IEEE, Antalya, Turkey (2017)10.1109/SIU.2017.7960299 ↗
35. Sonoda, J., Kimoto, T.: Object identification form GPR images by deep learning. In: 2018 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC), pp. 1298–1300. IEEE, Kyoto (2018)10.23919/APMC.2018.8617556 ↗
36. Elsaadouny, M., Barowski, J., Rolfes, I.: The subsurface objects classification using a convolutional neural network. In: 2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), pp. 0874–0877. IEEE, Vancouver, BC (2019)10.1109/IEMCON.2019.8936250 ↗
37. Besaw, L.E., Stimac, P.J.: Deep convolutional neural networks for classifying GPR B-scans. Presented at the SPIE Defense + Security, Baltimore, Maryland (2015)10.1117/12.2176250 ↗
38. Alvarez, J.K., Kodagoda, S.: Application of deep learning image-to-image transformation networks to GPR radargrams for sub-surface imaging in infrastructure monitoring. In: 2018 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), pp. 611–616. IEEE, Wuhan (2018)10.1109/ICIEA.2018.8397788 ↗
39. Khan, A., Shin, J.K., Lim, W.C., Kim, N.Y., Kim, H.S.: A deep learning framework for vibration-based assessment of delamination in smart composite laminates. Sensors 20, 2335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2008233510.3390/s20082335 ↗
40. Liu, H., Zhang, Y.: Deep learning based crack damage detection technique for thin plate structures using guided lamb wave signals. Smart Mater. Struct. 29, 015032 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab58d610.1088/1361-665X/ab58d6 ↗
41. Fang, Q., Nguyen, B.D., Ibarra Castanedo, C., Duan, Y., Maldague, X.: Defects detection in infrared thermography by deep learning algorithm. In: Oswald-Tranta, B., Zalameda, J.N. (eds.) Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XLII. p. 31. SPIE, Online Only (2020)10.1117/12.2555553 ↗
42. Gopalakrishnan, K., Gholami, H., Vidyadharan, A., Choudhary, A., Agrawal, A.: Crack damage detection in unmanned aerial vehicle images of civil infrastructure using pre-trained deep learning model. Int. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 8, 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2018.8(1).0110.7708/ijtte.2018.8(1).01 ↗
43. Dorafshan, S., Azari, H.: Evaluation of bridge decks with overlays using impact echo, a deep learning approach. Autom. Constr. 113, 103133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10313310.1016/j.autcon.2020.103133 ↗
44. Zhou, S., Song, W.: Concrete roadway crack segmentation using encoder-decoder networks with range images. Autom. Constr. 120, 103403 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10340310.1016/j.autcon.2020.103403 ↗
45. Völker, C., Shokouhi, P.: Clustering based multi sensor data fusion for honeycomb detection in concrete. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 34, 32 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-015-0307-710.1007/s10921-015-0307-7 ↗
46. Yilmaz, B., Ba, A., Jasiuniene, E., Bui, H.-K., Berthiau, G.: Evaluation of bonding quality with advanced nondestructive testing (NDT) and data fusion. Sensors 20, 5127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2018512710.3390/s20185127 ↗
47. Machine Learning‑Based Data Fusion Approach.pdf
48. Brierley, N., Tippetts, T., Cawley, P.: Data fusion for automated non-destructive inspection. Proc. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 470, 20140167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2014.016710.1098/rspa.2014.0167 ↗
49. Heideklang, R., Shokouhi, P.: Application of data fusion in nondestructive testing (NDT). 7
50. Ramos, L.F., Miranda, T., Mishra, M., Fernandes, F.M., Manning, E.: A Bayesian approach for NDT data fusion: the Saint Torcato church case study. Eng. Struct. 84, 120–129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.01510.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.015 ↗
51. Liu, Z., Tsukada, K., Hanasaki, K., Kurisu, M.: Two-dimensional eddy current signal enhancement via multifrequency data fusion. Res. Nondestruct. Eval. 11, 165–177 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/0934984990941002910.1080/09349849909410029 ↗
52. Ong, P., Graham, M., Houston, D.: Policy and programmatic importance of spatial alignment of data sources. Am. J. Public Health 96, 499–504 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.07137310.2105/AJPH.2005.071373 ↗
53. Yeh, P.-L., Liu, P.-L.: Application of the wavelet transform and the enhanced Fourier spectrum in the impact echo test. NDT E Int. 41, 382–394 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.01.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2008.01.002 ↗
54. Harkat, A., Benzid, R., Saidi, L.: Features extraction and classification of ECG beats using CWT combined to RBF neural network optimized by cuckoo search via levy flight. In: 2015 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE). pp. 1–4. IEEE, Boumerdes (2015)10.1109/INTEE.2015.7416767 ↗
55. Zhang, X., Nilot, E., Feng, X., Ren, Q., Zhang, Z.: IMF-slices for gpr data processing using variational mode decomposition method. Remote Sens. 10, 476 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1003047610.3390/rs10030476 ↗
56. Raihan, S.M., Wen, Y., Zeng, B.: Wavelet: a new tool for business cycle analysis (2005)10.20955/wp.2005.050 ↗
57. Shuvo, S.B., Ali, S.N., Swapnil, S.I., Hasan, T., Bhuiyan, M.I.H.: A lightweight CNN model for detecting respiratory diseases from lung auscultation sounds using EMD-CWT-based hybrid scalogram. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2020.304800610.1109/JBHI.2020.3048006 ↗
58. Mao, J., Wang, H., Spencer, B.F.: Toward data anomaly detection for automated structural health monitoring: Exploiting generative adversarial nets and autoencoders. Struct. Health Monit. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/147592172092460110.1177/1475921720924601 ↗
59. Lin, G., Milan, A., Shen, C., Reid, I.: RefineNet: multi-path refinement networks for high-resolution semantic segmentation. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). pp. 5168–5177. IEEE, Honolulu, HI (2017)10.1109/CVPR.2017.549 ↗
60. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. http://arxiv.org/150504597 (2015)10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
61. Lin, S., Meng, D., Choi, H., Shams, S., Azari, H.: Laboratory assessment of nine methods for nondestructive evaluation of concrete bridge decks with overlays. Constr. Build. Mater. 188, 966–982 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.12710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.127 ↗
62. Gucunski, N., Shokouhi, P., Maher, A.: Time-frequency techniques for the impact echo data analysis and interpretation, vol. 10
63. Shorten, C., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. J. Big Data. 6, 60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0197-010.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 ↗
64. Oskooi, B., Parnow, S., Smirnov, M., Varfinezhad, R., Yari, M.: Attenuation of random noise in GPR data by image processing. Arab. J. Geosci. 11, 677 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4035-z10.1007/s12517-018-4035-z ↗
65. Bi, W., Zhao, Y., An, C., Hu, S.: Clutter elimination and random-noise denoising of GPR signals using an SVD method based on the hankel matrix in the local frequency domain. Sensors 18, 3422 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s1810342210.3390/s18103422 ↗
66. Oskooi, B., Julayusefi, M., Goudarzi, A.: GPR noise reduction based on wavelet thresholdings. Arab. J. Geosci. 8, 2937–2951 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1339-510.1007/s12517-014-1339-5 ↗
67. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. http://arxiv.org/14126980 (2017)
68. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385 (2015)10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
69. Huang, G., Liu, Z., van der Maaten, L., Weinberger, K.Q.: Densely connected convolutional networks. http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.06993 (2018)10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 ↗
70. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Identity mappings in deep residual networks. http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.05027 (2016)10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38 ↗
71. Verma, S.K., Bhadauria, S.S., Akhtar, S.: Review of nondestructive testing methods for condition monitoring of concrete structures. J. Constr. Eng. 2013, 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/83457210.1155/2013/834572 ↗
72. Ali, H., Zaidi, A.F.A., Meng, C.E., Ahmad, M.R., Amran, T.S.T., Kanafiah, S.N.A.M., Fook, C.Y., Shukor, S.A.A., Elshaikh, M.: Shape classification of ground penetrating radar using discrete wavelet transform and principle component analysis. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 705, 012046 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/705/1/01204610.1088/1757-899X/705/1/012046 ↗
73. Wutke, M., Lejzerowicz, A., Garbacz, A.: The use of wavelet analysis to improve the accuracy of pavement layer thickness estimation based on amplitudes of electromagnetic waves. Materials 13, 3214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1314321410.3390/ma13143214 ↗