Harmonising Cross-System GPR Wave Amplitude for Concrete Diagnosis with Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Seismic Waves and Analysis · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Koppenjan, S.: 3. Ground Penetrating Radar Systems and Design, 1st edn., pp. 73–97. Elsevier, Oxford (2009)
2. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., Kim, J., Duong, T.H.: Understanding depth-amplitude effects in assessment of gpr data from concrete bridge decks. NDT E Int. 83, 48–58 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.06.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2016.06.004 ↗
3. Hong, S., Lai, W.L.W., Helmerich, R.: Experimental monitoring of chloride-induced reinforcement corrosion and chloride contamination in concrete with ground-penetrating radar. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11(1), 15–26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.87932110.1080/15732479.2013.879321 ↗
4. Hong, S., Lai, W.L.W., Wilsch, G., Helmerich, R., Helmerich, R., Günther, T., Wiggenhauser, H.: Periodic mapping of reinforcement corrosion in intrusive chloride contaminated concrete with gpr. Constr. Build. Mater. 66, 671–684 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.019 ↗
5. Lai, W.L.W., Kind, T., Stoppel, M., Wiggenhauser, H.: Measurement of accelerated steel corrosion in concrete using ground-penetrating radar and a modified half-cell potential method. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19(2), 205–220 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000008310.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000083 ↗
6. Dinh, K., Gucunski, N., Kim, J., Duong, T.H.: Method for attenuation assessment of gpr data from concrete bridge decks. NDT E Int. 92, 50–58 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.01610.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.016 ↗
7. Wong, T.W.P., Lai, W.L.W., Sham, J.F.C., Poon, C.S.: Hybrid non-destructive evaluation methods for characterizing chloride-induced corrosion in concrete. NDT E Int. 107, 102123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.05.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2019.05.008 ↗
8. Wong, T.W.P., Lai, W.L.W., Poon, C.S.: Classification of concrete corrosion states by gpr with machine learning. Constr. Build. Mater. 402, 132855 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13285510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132855 ↗
9. Wong, T.W.P., Lai, W.L.W.: Novel method for concrete corrosion phase classification with amplitude-frequency analysis in statistical approach. In: 18th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (2020). https://doi.org/10.1190/gpr2020-056.110.1190/gpr2020-056.1 ↗
10. ASTM: ASTM D6087-08: Standard Test Method for Evaluating Asphalt-Covered Concrete Bridge Decks Using Ground Penetrating Radar. ASTM (2015)
11. Wong, T.W.P., Lai, W.L.W.: Characterization of complex dielectric permittivity of concrete by gpr numerical simulation and spectral analysis. J. Nondestr. Eval. 41(1), 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-021-00836-z10.1007/s10921-021-00836-z ↗
12. Dérobert, X., Baltazart, V., Simonin, J.M., Todkar, S.S., Norgeot, C., Hui, H.Y.: Gpr monitoring of artificial debonded pavement structures throughout its life cycle during accelerated pavement testing. Remote Sens. 13(8), 33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1308147410.3390/rs13081474 ↗
13. Laurens, S., Balayssac, J.-P., Rhazi, J., Arliguie, G.: Influence of concrete relative humidity on the amplitude of ground-penetrating radar (gpr) signal. Mater. Struct. 35(4), 198–203 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0253308010.1007/BF02533080 ↗
14. Xiang, Z., Rashidi, A., Ou, G.G.: An Improved Convolutional Neural Network System for Automatically Detecting Rebar in GPR Data, pp. 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482438.05410.1061/9780784482438.054 ↗
15. Giannakis, I., Giannopoulos, A., Warren, C.: A machine learning scheme for estimating the diameter of reinforcing bars using ground penetrating radar. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 18(3), 461–465 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2020.297750510.1109/LGRS.2020.2977505 ↗
16. Xiang, Z., Ou, G., Rashidi, A.: Robust cascaded frequency filters to recognize rebar in gpr data with complex signal interference. Autom. Constr. 124, 103593 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10359310.1016/j.autcon.2021.103593 ↗
17. Wong, P.T.W., Lai, W.W.L.: Amplitude normalization for gpr data acquired from different instrumentations. In: 19th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, pp. 131–134 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1190/gpr2022-024.110.1190/gpr2022-024.1 ↗
18. Annan, A.P.: 1. Electromagnetic Principles of Ground Penetrating Radar, 1st edn., pp. 4–40. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)
19. Cassidy, N.J.: 2. Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications, pp. 41–72. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)10.1016/B978-0-444-53348-7.00002-8 ↗
20. Rhim, H.C., Buyukozturk, O.: Electromagnetic properties of concrete at microwave frequency range. ACI Mater. J. 95(3), 262–271 (1998)
21. Patsia, O., Giannopoulos, A.,Giannakis, I.: Background removal, velocity estimation, and reverse-time migration: a complete GPR processing pipeline based on machine learning. In: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 61, pp. 1–11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.330027610.1109/TGRS.2023.3300276 ↗
22. ASTM: ASTM D6432-11: Standard Guide for Using the Surface Ground Penetrating Radar Method for Subsurface Investigation. ASTM (2011)