A Computational Nondestructive Evaluation Algorithm Combining Self-Evolving Parameterization and Multi-Objective Optimization for Quantitative Damage Characterization
Source abstract
Abstract
A self-evolving parameterization approach for nondestructive evaluation (NDE) of damage in structural components is presented and numerically evaluated. Focused herein on problems relating to characterizing an unknown quantity of localized changes in properties, the adaptive approach utilizes the substantial solution diversity that is uniquely provided by multi-objective optimization to iteratively build up the parameterization and accurately characterize all localized property changes with the minimum dimensional parameterization. Through simulated test problems based on the characterization of damage within plates, the NDE approach with self-evolving parameterization is shown to provide an accurate and efficient process for the solution of inverse characterization problems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Brigham, J.C., Aquino, W., Mitri, F.G., Greenleaf, J.F., Fatemi, M.: Inverse estimation of viscoelastic material properties for solids immersed in fluids using vibroacoustic techniques. J. Appl. Phys. 101(2), 023509–023509-14 (2007). doi: 10.1063/1.242322710.1063/1.2423227 ↗
2. Brigham, J.C., Aquino, W.: Inverse viscoelastic material characterization using pod reduced-order modeling in acousticcstructure interaction. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198(9C12), 893–903 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.10.01810.1016/j.cma.2008.10.018 ↗
3. Rosario, D.E., Brigham, J.C., Aquino, W.: Identification of material properties of orthotropic elastic cylinders immersed in fluid using vibroacoustic techniques. Ultrasonics 48(6C7), 547–552 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.07.00410.1016/j.ultras.2008.07.004 ↗
4. Brigham, J.C., Aquino, W.: Surrogate-model accelerated random search algorithm for global optimization with applications to inverse material identification. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196(45C48), 4561–4576 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.01310.1016/j.cma.2007.05.013 ↗
5. Zhu, Y., Hall, T., Jiang, J.: A finite-element approach for young’s modulus reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22(7), 890–901 (2003). doi: 10.1109/TMI.2003.81506510.1109/TMI.2003.815065 ↗
6. Barbone, P.E., Bamber, J.C.: Quantitative elasticity imaging: what can and cannot be inferred from strain images. Phys. Med. Biol. 47(12), 2147 (2002). doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/12/31010.1088/0031-9155/47/12/310 ↗
7. Aguilo, M., Aquino, W., Brigham, J., Fatemi, M.: An inverse problem approach for elasticity imaging through vibroacoustics. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(4), 1012–1021 (2010). doi: 10.1109/TMI.2009.203922510.1109/TMI.2009.2039225 ↗
8. Wang, M., Brigham, J.C.: Assessment of multi-objective optimization for nondestructive evaluation of damage in structural components. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 1045389–13494933 (2013)
9. Teughels, A., Maeck, J., Roeck, G.D.: Damage assessment by fe model updating using damage functions. Comput. Struct. 80(25), 1869–1879 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00217-110.1016/S0045-7949(02)00217-1 ↗
10. Perera, R., Ruiz, A.: A multistage fe updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 22(4), 970–991 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.10.00410.1016/j.ymssp.2007.10.004 ↗
11. Ko, J., Sun, Z., Ni, Y.: Multi-stage identification scheme for detecting damage in cable-stayed kap shui mun bridge. Eng. Struct. 24(7), 857–868 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00024-X10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00024-X ↗
12. Guo, H., Li, Z.: A two-stage method to identify structural damage sites and extents by using evidence theory and micro-search genetic algorithm. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23(3), 769–782 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.07.00810.1016/j.ymssp.2008.07.008 ↗
13. Yun, G.J., Ogorzalek, K.A., Dyke, S.J., Song, W.: A two-stage damage detection approach based on subset selection and genetic algorithms. Smart Struct. Syst. 5, 1–21 (2009)10.12989/sss.2009.5.1.001 ↗
14. Moreno-García, P., Araújo dos Santos, J., Lopes, H.: A new technique to optimize the use of mode shape derivatives to localize damage in laminated composite plates. Compos. Struct. 108, 548–554 (2014)10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.050 ↗
15. Feijoo, G.R.: A new method in inverse scattering based on the topological derivative. Inverse Probl. 20(6), 1819 (2004). doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/20/6/00810.1088/0266-5611/20/6/008 ↗
16. Guzina, B.B., Bonnet, M.: Topological derivative for the inverse scattering of elastic waves. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 57(2), 161–179 (2004). doi: 10.1093/qjmam/57.2.16110.1093/qjmam/57.2.161 ↗
17. Bonnet, M., Guzina, B.B.: Sounding of finite solid bodies by way of topological derivative. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 61(13), 2344–2373 (2004). doi: 10.1002/nme.115310.1002/nme.1153 ↗
18. Jung, S., Ok, S.-Y., Song, J.: Robust structural damage identification based on multi-objective optimization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 81(6), 786–804 (2010). doi: 10.1002/nme.272610.1002/nme.2726 ↗
19. Oberai, A.A., Gokhale, N.H., Goenezen, S., Barbone, P.E., Hall, T.J., Sommer, A.M., Jiang, J.: Linear and nonlinear elasticity imaging of soft tissue in vivo: demonstration of feasibility. Phys. Med. Biol. 54(5), 1191 (2009)10.1088/0031-9155/54/5/006 ↗
20. Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, pp. 13–46. Wiley, New York (2001)
21. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
22. Michaels, J.E.: Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 17(3), 035035 (2008)10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035035 ↗
23. Li, Y., Udpa, L., Udpa, S.: Three-dimensional defect reconstruction from eddy-current nde signals using a genetic local search algorithm. IEEE Trans. Magn. 40(2), 410–417 (2004)10.1109/TMAG.2004.824116 ↗
24. Manson, G., Worden, K., Allman, D.: Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: Part III. damage location on an aircraft wing. J. Sound Vib. 259(2), 365–385 (2003). doi: 10.1006/jsvi.2002.516910.1006/jsvi.2002.5169 ↗
25. Giurgiutiu, V., Zagrai, A., Bao, J.: Damage identification in aging aircraft structures with piezoelectric wafer active sensors. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 15, 673–687 (2004)10.1177/1045389X04038051 ↗
26. Carden, E.P., Fanning, P.: Vibration based condition monitoring: A review. Struct. Health Monit. 3(4), 355–377 (2004). doi: 10.1177/147592170404750010.1177/1475921704047500 ↗
27. Maia, N., Silva, J., Almas, E., Sampaio, R.: Damage detection in structures: from mode shape to frequency response function methods. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 17(3), 489–498 (2003). doi: 10.1006/mssp.2002.150610.1006/mssp.2002.1506 ↗
28. Araujo dos Santos, J., Soares, M., Mota Soares, C., Maia, N.: Structural damage identification in laminated structures using FRF data. Compos. Struct. 67(2), 239–249 (2005)10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.011 ↗