Feasibility and Reliability of Grain Noise Suppression in Monitoring of Highly Scattering Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
A feasibility study on grain noise suppression using baseline subtraction is presented in this paper. Monitoring is usually done with permanently installed transducers but this is not always possible; here instead monitoring is conducted by carrying out repeat C-scans and the feasibility of grain noise suppression by subtracting A-scans extracted from the C-scans is investigated. The success of this technique depends on the ability to reproduce the same conditions for each scan, including a consistent stand-off, angle, and lateral position of the transducer relative to the testpiece. The significance of errors are illustrated and a 3D cross correlation is used which enables the same lateral position to be located within successive C-scans. The experimental results show that a noise reduction of around 15 dB is obtained after baseline subtraction, which will significantly improve the defect detection sensitivity. In practice however, successive C-scans may be conducted at different temperatures and with different transducers of similar specifications but a varying frequency response. Compensation techniques to reduce the impact of such variations are then presented and their effectiveness is verified experimentally. It is shown that it is feasible to obtain an overall improvement of around 10 dB in the signal to noise ratio via baseline subtraction, where a temperature difference of up to 10 $$^\circ $$ C and a peak frequency shift of as much as ±250 kHz from a baseline value of around 7 MHz can be tolerated. However, this improvement was obtained in laboratory conditions with no changes to the surface of the specimen due to oxidation or corrosion. It is shown that differences in temperature and transducer frequency response are more difficult to compensate for than changes in test geometry and position.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Langdon, T.G.: Grain boundary sliding as a deformation mechanism during creep. Philos. Mag. 22(178), 689–700 (1970)10.1080/14786437008220939 ↗
2. George, D.E.: Mechanical Metallurgy. McGraw Hill, New York (1961)
3. Mech, S., Michaels, T.: Development of ultrasonic examination methods for austenitic stainless steel weld inspection. Mater. Eval. 35(7), 61 (1977)
4. Newhouse, V., Bilgutay, N., Saniie, J., Furgason, E.: Flaw-to-grain echo enhancement by split-spectrum processing. Ultrasonics 20(2), 59–68 (1982)10.1016/0041-624X(82)90003-8 ↗
5. Karpur, P., Canelones, O.J.: Split spectrum processing: a new filtering approach for improved signal-to-noise ratio enhancement of ultrasonic signals. Ultrasonics 30(6), 351–357 (1992)10.1016/0041-624X(92)90090-9 ↗
6. Aussel, J.D.: Split-spectrum processing with finite impulse response filters of constant frequency-to-bandwidth ratio. Ultrasonics 28(4), 229–240 (1990)10.1016/0041-624X(90)90090-B ↗
7. Abbate, A., Koay, J., Frankel, J., Schroeder, S.C., Das, P.: Signal detection and noise suppression using a wavelet transform signal processor: application to ultrasonic flaw detection. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 44(1), 14–26 (1997)10.1109/58.585186 ↗
8. Lazaro, J., Emeterio, J.S., Ramos, A., Fernandez-Marron, J.: Influence of thresholding procedures in ultrasonic grain noise reduction using wavelets. Ultrasonics 40(1), 263–267 (2002)10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00149-X ↗
9. Sharma, G.K., Kumar, A., Rao, B.P., Jayakumar, T.: Continuous wavelet transform analysis for the enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio in coarse grain austenitic stainless steel. Mater. Eval. 72, 12 (2014)
10. Shankar, P.M., Karpur, P., Newhouse, V.L., Rose, J.L.: Split-spectrum processing: analysis of polarity threshold algorithm for improvement of signal-to-noise ratio and detectability in ultrasonic signals. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 36(1), 101–108 (1989)10.1109/58.16976 ↗
11. Herrmann, J., Kim, J.Y., Jacobs, L.J., Qu, J., Littles, J.W., Savage, M.F.: Assessment of material damage in a nickel-base superalloy using nonlinear Rayleigh surface waves. J. Appl. Phys. 99(12), 124913 (2006)10.1063/1.2204807 ↗
12. Konstantinidis, G., Wilcox, P.D., Drinkwater, B.W.: An investigation into the temperature stability of a guided wave structural health monitoring system using permanently attached sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 7(5), 905–912 (2007)10.1109/JSEN.2007.894908 ↗
13. Cawley, P., Cegla, F., Galvagni, A.: Guided waves for NDT and permanently-installed monitoring. Insight Non Destr. Test. Cond. Monit. 54(11), 594–601 (2012)10.1784/insi.2012.54.11.594 ↗
14. Croxford, A., Wilcox, P., Drinkwater, B., Konstantinidis, G.: Strategies for guided-wave structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 463, pp. 2961–2981. The Royal Society (2007)10.1098/rspa.2007.0048 ↗
15. Harley, J.B., Moura, J.M.: Scale transform signal processing for optimal ultrasonic temperature compensation. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 59(10) (2012)10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2448 ↗
16. Clarke, T.: Guided wave health monitoring of complex structures. Imp. Collage Lond. 182 (2009)
17. Clarke, T., Simonetti, F., Cawley, P.: Guided wave health monitoring of complex structures by sparse array systems: influence of temperature changes on performance. J. Sound Vib. 329(12), 2306–2322 (2010)10.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.052 ↗
18. Michaels, J.E., Michaels, T.E.: Detection of structural damage from the local temporal coherence of diffuse ultrasonic signals. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr Freq. Control 52(10), 1769–1782 (2005)10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1561631 ↗
19. Clarke, T., Simonetti, F., Rokhlin, S., Cawley, P.: Evaluation of the temperature stability of a low-frequency A0 mode transducer developed for SHM applications. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation: 34th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 975, pp. 910–917. AIP Publishing (2008)10.1063/1.2902761 ↗