journal article·2020-09

Graphic Augmented Defect Recognition for Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing on Tubular TKY Joints

H. Luo, Q. H. Chen, W. Lin

Publisher page

Abstract

A graphic augmented defect recognition algorithm was developed for phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) on tubular TKY joints. Based on PAUT sector scan (S-scan), 2D maps of the scans are obtained in terms of signal intensity and locations using spatial clustering and segmentation. The transformed S-scan data was further mapped with weld geometrical model to discriminate defect indications from the signals due to weld boundaries. Geometrical features of the identified defect indications were extracted to estimate the size and depth of the defects. The algorithm was verified by experiments on a TKY artefact with purposely-made defects. It shows that our algorithm was able to identify and locate all the defects in the artefact. Compared with the results obtained manually using the standard ultrasonic testing method, the differences of our results in terms of the defect size and depth were within 2 mm. The algorithm, coded into a software tool, demonstrated that the defects in the tubular TKY welds can be detected automatically and visualized in an intuitive manner.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. American National Standard.: Structural Welding Code—Steel, 17th edn., AWS D1.1 2000
2. American Petrol Institute.: Recommended Practice for Ultrasonic and Magnetic Examination of Offshore Structural Fabrication and Guidelines for Qualification of Technician. API Recommended Practice 2X Fourth Edition (2004)
3. Yoon, B., Kim, Y., Lee, J.: Steam generator small bore piping socket weld inspection using the phased array ultrasonic technique. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 51(2), 231–239 (2014)10.1080/00223131.2014.855151 ↗
4. Deutsch, W.A.K., Maxam, K., Razeng, M., Roye, W., Neau, G.: Phased array ultrasonic testing of longitudinally submerged arc-welded pipes in the pipe mill. Mater. Eval. 73(7), 937–943 (2015)
5. Zhang, J., Li, X.H., Shi, Y.K., Liang, L.S.: Phased array ultrasonic inspection of embedded defects in hydropower turbine runner welds. Insight 56(7), 390–394 (2014)10.1784/insi.2014.56.7.390 ↗
6. Wang, L.H., Lu, C., Dai, X., Zhong, D.H.: Ultrasonic phased array technology for inspection of semi penetrated T-welds. In: International Conference on Material Science and Material Engineering (MSME 2014), Chicago, IL, USA, 15–16, March, 2014, pp. 448–452
7. Luo, H., Chen, Q.H., Chen, W.S., et.al.: Enhancement of weld coverage and localization of defect through geometrical modeling for ultrasound inspection of Y weld. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Gothenburg, Sweden, 24–28 August, 2015, pp. 1484–148910.1109/CoASE.2015.7294309 ↗
8. Chen, C.M., Lu, H.S., Han, K.C.: A textural approach based on Gabor functions for texture edge detection in ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27(4), 515–534 (2001)10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00323-9 ↗
9. Gong, L.X., Pathak, S.D., Haynor, D.R., Cho, P.S., Kim, Y.: Parametric shape modeling using deformable superellipses for prostate segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23(3), 340–349 (2004)10.1109/TMI.2004.824237 ↗
10. Xie, J., Jiang, Y., Tsui, H.T.: Segmentation of kidney from ultrasound images based on texture and shape priors. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24(1), 45–57 (2005)10.1109/TMI.2004.837792 ↗
11. Yan, P., Xu, S., Turkbey, B., Kruecker, J.: Discrete deformable model guided by partial active shape model for trus image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57(5), 1158–1166 (2010)10.1109/TBME.2009.2037491 ↗
12. Yan, P., Xu, S., Turkbey, B., Kruecker, J.: Adaptively learning local shape statistics for prostate segmentation in ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58(3), 633–641 (2011)10.1109/TBME.2010.2094195 ↗
13. Ahmed, K., Redouane, D., Mohamed, K.: 2D Gabor functions and FCMI algorithm for flaws detection in ultrasonic images. Int. J. Comput. Electr. Autom. Control Inf. Eng. 1(9), 2870–2874 (2007)
14. Osman, A.: Automated evaluation of three dimensional ultrasonic datasets. PhD dissertation, University Erlangen Nurnberg (2013)
15. Shitole, C., Zahran, O., Nuaimy, W.: Combining fuzzy logic and neural networks in classification of weld defects using ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction. Insight 49(2), 79–82 (2007)10.1784/insi.2007.49.2.79 ↗
16. Kotropoulos, C., Pitas, I.: Segmentation of ultrasonic images using support vector machines. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 24(4–5), 715–727 (2009)
17. Y. X.: Image Decomposition based ultrasound image segmentation by using fuzzy clustering. In: 2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ISIEA 2009), October 4–6, 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 6–10
18. Liu, X., Zhou, R.: Fuzzy c-means clustering recognition in ultrasonic fault detection in bonding steel plate and rubber material. Mater. Res. Innov. 18(S2), S2-286–S2-289 (2014)10.1179/1432891714Z.000000000412 ↗
19. Prabusankarlal, K.M., Thirumoorthy, P., Manavalan, R.: Combining clustering, morphology and metaheuristic optimization technique for segmentation of breast ultrasound images to detect tumors. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 86(14), 0975–8887 (2014)
20. Skomonokhov, A.O., Belousov, P.A., Nakhabir, A.V.: Cluster analysis of ultrasonic testing data. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 16(1), 82–84 (2006)10.1134/S1054661806010263 ↗
21. Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J., Xu, X.: Simoudis, Evangelos and etc., “A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996, pp. 226–231
22. Ankerst, M., Breunig, M.M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J.: OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. In: ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, 1999, pp. 49–6010.1145/304181.304187 ↗
23. Jonsson, M.: Ultrasound artifacts. Master thesis for Lund University (2015)